Writing & Pedagogy, Vol 8, No 2 (2016)

L1 and L2 adolescents’ perspectives on writing within and across academic disciplines: Examining the role of agency in writing development

Jill V. Jeffery, Kristen C. Wilcox
Issued Date: 11 Nov 2016

Abstract


To investigate a diverse sample of adolescent writers’ experiences with disciplinary writing, this study compared 66 adolescents’ perceptions of writing through an analysis of interviews as part of a national study. Grounded in a social constructivist framework that stresses the role of agency in the development of writing competence, the study aims to examine factors – including language background and prior writing experiences – that are associated with adolescents’ perceptions of their writing development. The study asked: How do L1 and L2 adolescents’ perceptions of writing development compare? To what extent, if at all, is agency implicated in patterns of variation? Results of the comparative analysis suggest that varying affordances and constraints, and combinations of these, relate to adolescents’ expressed agency toward writing. Affordances include opportunities to select personally relevant subjects and to develop writing through feedback and revision processes; constraints include the use of highly structured writing scaffolds, formulas, and tightly constrained topics. Implications for differentiated scaffolding of writing instruction that might affectively and cognitively engage diverse adolescent learners are discussed.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/wap.28750

References


Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30,
109–137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069211 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/
annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Applebee, A. N. (2013). Common Core State Standards: The promise and the
peril in a national palimpsest. English Journal 103, 25–33. http://www.ncte.
org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/EJ/1031-sep2013/EJ1031Common.
pdf
Applebee A.N., and Langer, J. (2011). The National Study of Writing Instruction:
Methods and procedures. Center on English Language and Achievement.
Retrieved on 15 August 2012 from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/
NSWI_2011_methods_procedures.pdf
Applebee, A. N., and Langer, J. A. (2013). Writing instruction that works: Proven
methods for middle and high school classrooms. New York: Teachers College
Press.
Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., and Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based
approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student
performance in middle and high school English. American Education Research
Journal 40, 685–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685
Beck, S. W. (2006). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning
of writing. Research in the Teaching of English 40, 413–462. http://www.jstor.
org/stable/40171710
Beck, S.W., Llosa, L., and Fredrick, T. (2013). The challenges of writing exposition:
Lessons from a study of ELL and non-ELL high school students. Reading and
Writing Quarterly 29, 358–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.758938
Beck, S., and Jeffery, J.V. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks.
Journal of Literacy Research, 41 (2), 1–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
10862960902908483
Bryson, M., and Scardamalia, M. (1996). Fostering reflectivity in the argumentive
thinking of students with different learning histories. Reading and Writing
Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties 12, 351–384. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/1057356960120402
Callahan, R., Wilkinson, L., and Muller, C. (2010). Academic achievement and
course taking among language minority youth in US schools: Effects of ESL
placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32, 84–117. http://
dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373709359805
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2016). Preparing America’s students
for success. Retrieved on 10 May 2016 from http://www.corestandards.org/
Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing student’s perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue,
and change in education. Educational Research 31, 3–14. http://dx.doi.
org/10.3102/0013189X031004003
Cummins, J. (2011). Identity matters: From evidence-free to evidence-based policies
for promoting achievement among students from marginalized social groups.
Writing and Pedagogy 3, 189–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v3i2.189
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment
to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in
discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Philadelphia, PA:
John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Enright, K. A. (2014). Standards and personalization in the writing of linguistically
diverse students. Writing and Pedagogy 6, 59–88. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1558/wap.v6i1.59
Gilliland, B. (2017). Opportunity gaps: Curricular discontinuities across ESL,
mainstream, and college English. In C. Ortmeier-Hooper and T. Ruecker
(Eds) Resident Multilingual and Linguistic Minority Writers: Transitions and
Disruptions Across High Schools, Bridge Programs, and Colleges (pp. 21–35).
New York: Routledge.
Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., and Morphy, P. (2014).
Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and
Writing 27, 1015–1042. doi: 10.10007/s11145-013-9495-7
Graham, S., and Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve
writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Washington, DC: Alliance for
Excellence in Education.
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments.
TESOL Quarterly 28, 241–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587433
Hill, K. (2015). Measuring disadvantaged pupils’ attainment gaps over time
(updated). Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/
government/statistics/measuring-disadvantaged-pupils-attainment-gapsover-time

Jeffery, J. V., and Wilcox, K. C. (2013). ‘How do I do it if I don’t like writing?’:
Adolescents’ stances toward writing across disciplines. Reading and Writing:
An Interdisciplinary Journal 27 (6), 1095–1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
s11145-013-9493-9
Kibler, A. (2011). ‘I write it in a way that people can read it’: How teachers
and adolescent L2 writers describe content area writing. Journal of Second
Language Writing 20, 211–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.005
Klein, P. D., and Boscolo, P. (2016). Trends in research on writing as a learning activity.
Journal of Writing Research 7 (3), 311–350. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2016.07.3.01
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., and Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high
school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology 101,
136–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
Kockelman, P. (2007). Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge.
Current Anthropology 48, 375–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/512998
Kohn, A. (2000). Burnt at the high stakes. Journal of Teacher Education 51,
315–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051004007
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager
writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly 34, 457–482. http://dx.doi.org/
10.2307/3587739
Lawrence, J. F., Galloway, E. P., Yim, S., and Lin, A. (2013). Learning to write in
middle school? Insights into adolescent writers’ instructional experiences
across content areas. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 57, 151–161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.219
Lahey, J. (2016). To help students learn, engage the emotions. New York
Times (4 May), retrieved from http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/05/04/
to-help-students-learn-engage-the-emotions/?smid=fb-nytimesandsmtyp=cur
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis:
A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review
of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in
Education 31, 1–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001
National Center for Education Statistics (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing
2011. Retrieved 1 October 2012, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.
asp?pubid=2012470
Nazarenko, L., and Schwartz, G. (2010). A refocused approach to writing instruction.
Incorporating a focus on genre into the writing process. Writing and
Pedagogy 2, 103–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v2i1.103
Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Olson, C. B., Land, R., Anselmi, T., and AuBuchon, C. (2010). Teaching secondary
English learners to understand, analyze, and write interpretive essays about
theme. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 54, 245–256. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1598/JAAL.54.4.2
Olson, C. B., Kim, J. S., Scarcella, R., Kramer, J., Pearson, M., van Dyke, D. A.,
Collins, P., Land, R. E. (2012). Enhancing the interpretive reading and analytical
writing of English learners in secondary school: Results from a randomized
field trial using a cognitive strategies approach. (2012). American Educational
Research Journal 49, 323–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831212439434
Ortmeier-Hooper, C. (2013). The ELL writer: Moving beyond basics in the secondary
classroom: New York: Teachers College Press.
Ortmeier-Hooper, C. and Enright, K. A. (2011). Mapping new territory: Toward
an understanding of adolescent L2 writers and writing in US contexts. Journal
of Second Language Writing 20, 167–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jslw.2011.05.002
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Prain, V., and Hand, B. (1999). Students’ perceptions of writing for learning in
secondary science. Science Education 83, 151–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:23.0.CO;2-S
Roberts, C. (2009). Professional development and high-stakes testing: Disparate
influences on student writing performance. Writing and Pedagogy 1, 65–90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i1.63
Shanahan, T., and Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents:
Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review 78,
40–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Smagorinsky, P., Daigle, E. A., O’Donnell-Allen, C., and Bynum, S. (2010). Bullshit
in academic writing: A protocol analysis of a high school senior’s process of
interpreting Much Ado About Nothing. Research in the Teaching of English 44,
368–405. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25704887
Tardy, C. M. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A
comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing 15,
79–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.003
Taylor, S. T., and Cummins, J. (2011). Second language writing practices, identity,
and the academic achievement of children from marginalized social groups: A
comprehensive view. Writing and Pedagogy 3. 181–188. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1558/wap.v3i2.181
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. (M. Cole, V. J.Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Eds)
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Werderich, D. E., and Armstrong, S. L. (2013). Examining the conceptualizations,
preferences, and practices of adolescent writers. Literacy Research and
Instruction 52, 339–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.812167
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated
action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilcox, K. C. (2011). Writing across the curriculum for secondary school English
language learners: A case study. Writing and Pedagogy 3 (1), 79–111. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v3i1.79
Wilcox, K. C., and Jeffery, J. V. (2014). Adolescents’ writing in the content areas:
National study results. Research in the Teaching of English 49, 168–176. https://
login.ez-proxy.brooklyn.cuny.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docvi
ew/1628065147?accountid=7286
Wilcox, K. C., and Jeffery, J. V. (2015). Adolescent English learners’ stances toward
content-area writing. English for Specific Purposes 38, 44–56. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.esp.2014.11.006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: info@equinoxpub.com

Privacy Policy