Interactional and multimodal resources in children's game explanations

Authors

  • Friederike Kern Bielefeld University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.12419

Keywords:

adult-child-interaction, game explanations, global and local coherence, formulations, understanding, discourse acquisition

Abstract

This paper investigates how adults support pre-school children when accomplishing game explanations. Game explanations are ‘big packages’ that require specific discourse competences to establish local and global coherence. As explanations in general, they have the overall goal to distribute knowledge about a particular matter to the recipient(s). Analyses of explanations of 4-year-old children (n = 20) are presented who were asked to explain a board game to their caregiver. The following questions are addressed: (1) How do the caregivers support the children’s management of explaining the game by co-constructing global and local coherence? (2) What resources do the parents employ to maintain understanding throughout the explanation in order to support and ensure the transfer of knowledge? Analysis will concentrate on the adults’ multimodal practices to establish local and global coherence in the ongoing game explanations, and on their practices to achieve understanding on what the game is about and how it is played. The results will be discussed in relation to game explanations’ underlying function of stepwise knowledge transition, and with regard to developmental issues concerning the use of multimodal practices as scaffolding devices in situated talk.

Author Biography

  • Friederike Kern, Bielefeld University

    Friederike Kern, Prof. Dr, teaches German linguistics and their didactics at Bielefeld University. After studying German literature, linguistics and philosophy in Berlin and London, she was awarded her DPhil from the University of Hamburg on the communicative differences between East and West Germans in job interviews. Her research interests are in the area of conversational analysis, first language acquisition and language development, language contact, classroom discourse, and prosody. Her publications include work on rhythm in Turkish German, the development of story-telling of young schoolchildren and interaction in learning situations.

References

Bateman, A. & Carr, M. (2017). Pursuing a telling: Managing a multi-unit turn in children’s storytelling. In A. Bateman & A. Church (eds), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 91–110). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_6

Cekaite, A. & Goodwin, M. H. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences

in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.pragma.2012.07.008

Clark, E. (2014). Pragmatics in acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 41, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000117

Clark, E. & J. Bernicott (2008). Repetition as ratification: How parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language, 35, 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008537

Clarke, M., Soto, G. & Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130

Corrin, J. (2010). Hm? What? Maternal repair and early child talk. In H. Garner & M. Forrester (eds), Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Analysis (pp. 23–41). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Delves, K. & Stirling, L. (2010). Studying misunderstanding and repair in adult–child interactions: Lessons from conversations with typically developing children and high functioning children with autism. In Y. Treis & R. De Busser (eds), Selected Papers from the 2009 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Retrieved from www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2009/delvesstirling.pdf.

Filipi, A. (2017). Exploring the recognizability of early story-telling through an interactional lens. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 1(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.31370

Filipi, A. (2019). Snapshots of tellings in an Australian Context. Research on Children and Social Interaction, (1–2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37285

Forrester, M. & Reason, D. (2006). Competency and participation in acquiring a mastery of language: A reconsideration of the idea of membership. The Sociological Review, 54(3), 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00625.x

Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, E. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (eds), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151

Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069459

Günthner, S. & Knoblauch, H. (1995). Culturally patterned speaking practices. Pragmatics, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.5.1.03gun

Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York: Routledge.

Hausendorf, H. & Quasthoff, U. (2005). Sprachentwicklung und Interaktion: Eine linguistische Studie zum Erwerb von Diskursfähigkeiten. Retrieved from www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2005/quasthoff.htm.

Heller, V. (2012). Kommunikative Erfahrungen von Kindern in Familie und Unterricht. Passungen und Divergenzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Heller, V. (2014). Discursive practices in family dinner talk and classroom discourse: a contextual comparison. Special Issue of Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.001

Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state-token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 219–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J. & Sorjonen M. L. (1994). Constitution and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656

Heritage, J. & Watson, D. (1980). Formulations as conversational objects. Semiotica, 3(4), 245-262.

Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of story-telling in conversation. In J. N. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press.

Jefferson, G. (2007). Preliminary notes on abdicated other-correction. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.006

Keppler, A. (1989). Schritt für Schritt. Das Verfahren alltäglicher Belehrungen. Soziale Welt, 40 (4), 538–556.

Keppler, A. & Luckmann, T. (1991). ‘Teaching’: Conversational transmission of knowledge. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds), Asymmetries in Dialogue (pp. 143–165). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Kern, F. (2003). Bedeutung und Interaktion. Spielerklärungen von Kindern. In S. Haberzettl & H. Wegener (eds), Die Rolle der Konzeptualisierung im Spracherwerb (pp. 257–273). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Kern, F. (2007). Prosody as a resource in children’s game explanations: Some aspects of turn construction and recipiency. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.017

Kern, F. & Quasthoff, U. (2005). Fantasy stories and conversational narratives of personal experience: Genre-specific, interactional and developmental aspects. In T. Becker & U. Quasthoff (eds), Narrative Interaction (pp. 15–56). Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.5.03ker

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Macbeth. D. (2011). Understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006

Morek, M. (2012). Kinder erklären – Interaktionen in Familie und Unterricht im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Morek, M. (2015). Show that you know – Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family-talk and peer-talk. Linguistics and Education, 31, 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.004

Nevile, M. (2006). Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies, 8(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061797

Quasthoff, U., Heller, V. & Morek, M. (2017). On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction: An analytical framework. Discourse Studies, 19(I), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616683596

Robinson, J. D. (2012). Overall structural organization. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (eds), Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 257–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch13

Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I & II. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301

Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (eds), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, E. (2008). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: CUP.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Selting, M. (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, 477–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012

Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K. … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by E. Couper-Kuhlen and D. Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.

Stude, J. (2006). Was gehört in eine Spielanleitung? Unterrichtliche Strukturierungshilfen auf dem Prüfstand. Grundschule, 12, 36–37.

Tarplee, C. (2006). Working on young children’s utterances: Prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labelling. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies (pp. 406–435). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.012

Theobald, M. (2019). Scaffolding storytelling and participation with a bilingual child in a culturally and linguistically diverse preschool in Australia. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 3(1–2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37294

Downloads

Published

2020-07-21

How to Cite

Kern, F. (2020). Interactional and multimodal resources in children’s game explanations. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.12419