Re-thinking the Guru

Towards a Typology of Forms of Religious Domination in Pre-Colonial Pañjab

Authors

  • James M. Hegarty Cardiff University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v3i2.183

Keywords:

critical theory, hagiography, Indian literature, Sikh, South Asia

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the role of hagiographical tradition in the formation of Sikh identity and in shaping the attitude’s of Sikhs to non-Sikhs in eighteenth-century Pañjab. I focus on one particular hagiography, the B40 Janam Sakhi, which tells of the life and deeds of Guru Nanak. I suggest that, by inserting Nanak and his work in a range of dramatic scenarios, the B40 develops a perspective on the Guru and the austere devotional ideals of his verse that considerably widens their social appeal and cosmic scope, and establishes an arena for the formation and adaptation of forms of religious identity and domination amongst Sikhs. I suggest that this form of analysis may serve to enrich and broaden the productive scholarly dialogue concerning the social and political life of the suffix -ism, the designation ‘religion’ and the development of a wide variety of, by turn, cherished and vilified definitional perspectives in South Asian studies.

Author Biography

  • James M. Hegarty, Cardiff University

    Senior Lecturer in Indian Religions School of History, Archaelology and Religion Humanities Building Colum Drive CF10 3EU [email protected]

References

Alam, M. 1986. The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Alam, M., and S. Subrahmanyam (eds.). 1998. The Mughal State 1756–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Callewaert, W. M. 1994. ‘Bhagatmals and Parcais in Rajasthan.’ In Callewaert and Snell 1994: 87-98.

Callewaert W. M. (ed.). 1996. Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass.

Callewaert W. M., and R. Snell (eds.). 1994. According to Tradition: Hagiographical Writing in India. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.

Chandra, S. 2002 [1959]. Parties and Politics at the Mughal Court 1707–1740. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Digby, S. 2003. ‘The Sufi Shaikh as a Source of Authority.’ In Richard M. Eaton (ed.), India’s Islamic Traditions 711–1750: 234–62. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Dirks, N. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Habib, I., and T. Raychaudhuri. 1982. The Cambridge Economic History of India: Volume 1, c. 1200–c. 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hacker, Paul. 1978. Kleine Schriften. Ed. L. Schmithausen; Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1981. ‘Inclusivism and Tolerance in the Encounter between East and West.’ In W. Halbfass, India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding: 403–18; notes on 527-26. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Kohli, Surinder Singh. 1961. A Critical Study of Adi Granth. Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass.

Lidova, N. 1994. Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Lorenzen, D. 1999. ‘Who Invented Hinduism?’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 41(4) (October): 630–59. doi:10.1017/S0010417599003084

Lutgendorf, P. 1994. ‘The Quest for the Legendary Tulsidas.’ In Callewaert and Snell 1994: 65-85.

McLeod, W. H. 1980a. The B40 Janam Sakhi. Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University.

— 1980b. Early Sikh Tradition: A Study of the Janam-sakhis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

— 1999. Sikhs and Sikhism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

— 2003. Sikhs of the Khalsa: A History of the Khalsa Rahit. Oxford and Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Mann, Gurinder Singh. 2001. The Making of Sikh Scripture. Delhi: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195130243.001.0001

Oberoi, Harjot. 1994. The Construction of Religious Boundaries: Culture, Identity, and Diversity in the Sikh Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pollock, S. 1993a. ‘Ramayana and Political Imagination in India.’ Journal of Asian Studies 52(2): 261–97. doi:10.2307/2059648

— 1993b. ‘Deep Orientalism? Notes on Sanskrit and Power beyond the Raj.’ In C. A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer (eds.), Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia: 76–133. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Radhakrishnan, S. 1980 [1927]. The Hindu View of Life. London: Unwin Paperbacks.

Singh, K. 1991 [1963]. A History of the Sikhs Volume One 1469–1839. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Singh, Pashaura. 2000. The Guru Granth Sahib: Canon, Meaning and Authority. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Singh, Piar. 1974. Janam Sakhi Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji. Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University.

Smith, B. K. 1998. Reflections on Resemblance, Ritual and Religion. Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass.

Smith, J. Z. 1982. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Spear, P. 1949. India, Pakistan, and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sukthankar, V. S., et al. (eds.). 1933–72. The Mahabharata. Pune: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

von Stietencron, H. 1995. ‘Religious Configurations in Pre-Muslim India and the Modern Concept of Hinduism.’ In Vasudha Dalmia and Heinrich von Stietencron (eds.), Representing Hinduism: The Construction of Religious Traditions and National Identity: 51–81. New Delhi: Sage.

Published

2010-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hegarty, J. M. (2010). Re-thinking the Guru: Towards a Typology of Forms of Religious Domination in Pre-Colonial Pañjab. Religions of South Asia, 3(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v3i2.183