Thinking About Transformative Aspects of Gnostic Writing Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.38705Keywords:
gnosticism, Pierre Hadot, writing, pedagogy, Nag Hammadi, conversionAbstract
This article discusses some of the ways in which our understanding of gnosticism could be expanded if we looked at gnostic texts as means to create new selves for their readers, rather than imparting doctrinal knowledge or giving evidence regarding the power struggles and self-definitions at play in early Christian communities. Drawing on both the work of Pierre Hadot and modern understandings of writing pedagogy, the article argues that it would be useful to be able to read these texts as means by which the reader could create a gnostic sense of self, with specific content seen as a means to that end. This need not be the only perspective taken on gnosticism; rather, it is presented as a useful tool to add to our interpretive toolkit
References
Bartholomae, David. 1986. “Inventing the University.” Journal of Basic Writing 5(1): 4–23.
Desjardins, Michel. 1990. Sin in Valentinianism. SBL Dissertation Series 108. Chico: Scholars Press.
Gogan, Brian. 2017. “Reading as Transformation.” In What is College Reading?, edited by Alice Horning, Deborah-Lee Gollnitz, and Cynthia Haller, 41–56. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
Hadot, Pierre. 2002 [1995]. What is Ancient Philosophy? Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hjelm, Titus. 2005. “Tradition as Legitimation in New Religious Movements.” In Historicizing “Tradition” in the Study of Religion, edited by Steven Engler and Gregory P. Grieve, 109–123. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110901405.109
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Kaler, Michael. 2018. “Praises and Rebukes in the Gnostic Revelation Dialogues.” Religions and Education in Antiquity: Studies in Honour of Michel Desjardins, edited by Alex Damm, 212–224. Numen 160. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004384613_011
Kaler, Michael and Marie-Pierre Bussières. 2006. “Was Heracleon a Valentinian? A New Look at Old Sources.” Harvard Theological Review 99(3): 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816006001258
King, Karen. 2003. What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge: Belknap.
Kripal, Jeffrey. 2007. The Serpent’s Gift: Gnostic Reflections on the Study of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226453828.001.0001
———. 2010. Authors of the Impossible: The Paranormal and the Sacred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2011. Mutants and Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2013.17.1.125
Marcus, Greil. 1989. Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the 20th Century. Princeton: Harvard University Press.
Painchaud, Louis and Michael Kaler. 2007. “From the ‘Prayer of the Apostle Paul’ to the ‘Three Steles of Seth’: Codices I, XI and VII from Nag Hammadi Viewed as a Collection.” Vigiliae Christianae 61(4): 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007207x186042
Thomassen, Einar. 2006. The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the “Valentinians.” Nag Hammadi and Manichean Studies: 60. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022046909990856
Turner, John. 2001. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Bibliothèque copte de Nag Hammadi, section Études: 6. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842989202100115
Turner, John. 2007. “The Book of Thomas and the Platonic Jesus.” In L’Evangile selon Thomas et les textes de Nag Hammadi. Traditions et convergences. Actes du colloque tenu a Quebec les 29, 30 et 31 mai 2003. Edited by Louis Painchaud and Paul-Hubert Poirier, 599–633. Quebec: Les Presses de l’Universite Laval. https://doi.org/10.1522/030430906
Williams, Michael. 1999. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3170779
