William James on Religious Saints and Verifying the God Hypothesis

Authors

  • John R Shook State University of New York at Buffalo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v32i2.185

Keywords:

William James, American pragmatism, religion, philosophy, science

Abstract

William James proposed a Science of Religions in his Varieties of Religious Experience in order to fulfill his promise that pragmatic empiricism could illuminate the meaning and truth conditions of religious ideas. Most commentators have focused either on his “will to believe” defense of faith, or on his analysis of the power of mystical inspiration. A unifying interpretation is assembled, synthesizing his kind of pragmatism, his fascination with mysticism, and his application of Science of Religions to religious saints. Religious saints generate live hypotheses about society moving towards the ideal moral order. People can participate in that momentous opportunity for progress with their own moral lives. Although James’s Science of Religions permits interdisciplinary inquiry into religious experience, and especially the moral energy of inspired saints, his hopes for verifying hypotheses about God cannot be fulfilled.

References

Barnard, G. William. 1997. Exploring Unseen Worlds: William James and the Philosophy of Mysticism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Fontinell, Eugene. 2000. Self, God, and Immortality: A Jamesian Investigations. 2nd edition. New York: Fordham University Press.

Graham, George. 1992. William James and the Affirmation of God. New York: Peter Lang.

James, William. 1897. The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Psychology. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. Cited as WB.

———. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. Cited as VRE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10004-000

———. 1907. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. Cited as Prag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10851-000

———. 1935. The Thought and Character of William James. Edited by Ralph B. Perry, 2 vols. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. Cited as TCWJ.

———. 1975. Pragmatism, The Works of William James, ed. Frederick Burkhardt et al. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited as Works Prag.

———. 1979. The Will to Believe and Other Essays, The Works of William James. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited as Works WB.

———. 1985. The Varieties of Religious Experience: The Works of William James, edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited as Works VRE.

Levinson, Henry S. 1981. The Religious Investigations of William James. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Myers, Gerald. 1986. William James: His Life and Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Pihlström, Sami. 2013. “The Jamesian Pragmatic Method in the Philosophy of Religion.” In Pragmatic Pluralism and the Problem of God. Edited by Sami Pihlström, l99–127. New York: Fordham University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823251582.003.0005

Proudfoot, Wayne. 2004. “Pragmatism and ‘an Unseen Order’ in Varieties.” In William James and a Science of Religions, edited by Wayne Proudfoot, 31–47. New York: Columbia University Press.

Slater, Michael. 2009. William James on Ethics and Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635298

Sprigge, T.L.S. 2005. “James as a Religious Realist.”In William James and The Varieties of Religious Experience, edited by Jeremy Carrette, 191–202. London: Routledge.

Suckiel, Ellen Kappy. 1996. Heaven’s Champion: William James’s Philosophy of Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Published

2014-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shook, J. R. (2014). William James on Religious Saints and Verifying the God Hypothesis. Religious Studies and Theology, 32(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v32i2.185