Dominion in Christian Farming

Authors

  • Suzanne Armstrong Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.32549

Keywords:

Christianity, dominion, stewardship, farming, worldview, environment, land, animals, Genesis

Abstract

Genesis 1:27–28 and 2:15 are the basis for significant debate on conceptions of stewardship and dominion in Christian responses to environmental issues. Key criticisms of historical perspectives of dominion in the west, including from White, have been influential on Christian environmental responses. However, perspectives of dominion persist among some groups of Christians in their worldview of human-nature relations. Farmers in particular find dominion important as a justification for use and development of nature through farming methods and technologies. Often dominion is used along side or within an understanding of stewardship, which exhorts responsibility towards nature. Within the CFFO, a dominion perspective sees farmers as co-creators with God, able to make creation more than it was. Other farmers, however, temper or reject the concept of dominion.

References

Armstrong, Suzanne. 2015. “The Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario: Integrating Christian Principles with the Practicality of Farming.” PhD diss., Wilfrid Laurier University.

Berry, Wendell. 2002. The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry, edited by Norman Wirzba. Berkeley: Counterpoint.

Creation Stewardship Task Force of the Christian Reformed Church in North America. 2012. “Creation Stewardship Task Force Report.” Grand Rapids MI: Christian Reformed Church in North America.

Ellis, Colter. 2013. “The Symbiotic Ideology: Stewardship, Husbandry, and Dominion in Beef Production.” Rural Sociology 78: 429–449. https:/doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12031

Fick, Gary W. 2008. Food, Farming, and Faith. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hall, Douglas John. 1990. The Steward: A Biblical Symbol Come of Age. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Immergut, Matthew B. and Laurel Kearns. 2012. “When Nature is Rats and Roaches: Religious Eco-Justice Activism in Newark, NJ.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 6: 176–195. https:/doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v6i2.176

Kearns, Laurel. 1996. “Saving the Creation: Christian Environmentalism in the United States.” Sociology of Religion 57: 55–70. https:/doi.org/10.2307/3712004

———. 1997. “Noah’s Ark Goes to Washington: A Profile of Evangelical Environmentalism.” Social Compass 44: 349–366. https:/doi.org/10.1177/003776897044003004

Kearns, Laurel. 2014. “Green Evangelicals.” In The New Evangelical Social Engagement, edited by Brian Steensland and Philip Goff, 157–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leopold, Aldo. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

Paterson, John L. 1998. “Geography and Religion, Agriculture and Stewardship: The Practice of Agricultural Stewardship the Christian Farmers Federations of Canada.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.

———. 2003. “Conceptualizing Stewardship in Agriculture within the Christian Tradition.” Environmental Ethics 25: 43–58. https:/doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200325144

Phillips, Benjamin B. 2011. “A Creature among Creatures or Lord of Creation? The Vocation of Dominion in Christian Theology.” Journal of Markets & Morality 14: 133–146.

Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 1992. Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing. San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.

White, Lynn Jr. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155: 1203–1207. https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203

Wilkinson, Loren. 1991. Earthkeeping in the ’90s: Stewardship of Creation. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Published

2016-12-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Armstrong, S. (2016). Dominion in Christian Farming. Religious Studies and Theology, 35(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.32549