On the unpredictability of contact effects

Authors

  • Sarah G Thomason University of Michigan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v1i1.173

Keywords:

language contact, linguistic change, predictive generalizations, bilingualism, interference features

Abstract

Historical linguists know that any search for deterministic predictions on language change is bound to fail. But the urge to explain linguistic change is strong, and many linguists have proposed generalizations that make limited predictions about what can and what cannot happen in language history. In language contact situations, the major predictors of possible linguistic results are social rather than linguistic. But, specifying the crucial social factors turns out to be difficult. Only one social factor appears to yield a reliable constraint on the linguistic effects of contact: the presence or absence of full bilingualism among the speakers who introduce interference into a language. On the other hand, trying to find a reliable correlation, across a wide range of contact situations, between any specific attitudinal factors and specific linguistic results is probably doomed. Therefore, the goal of this paper is not to offer predictive generalizations about ways in which attitudes determine the linguistic results of contact, but rather to show why it is so difficult to find any.

References

Collins, J.T. (1980). “Laha, a language of the Central Moluccas”. Indonesia Circle 23, 3-19.

Dorian, N.C. (ed.) (1989). Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fenyvesi, A. (1995). “Language contact and language death in an immigrant language: The case of Hungarian”. University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 1-117.

Foley, W.A. (1986). The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kulick, D. (1992). Language Shift and Cultural Reproduction: Socialization, Self and Syncretism in a Papua New Guinean Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.

Laycock, D.C. (1982). “Melanesian linguistic diversity: A Melanesian choice?”. In R.J. May & H. Nelson (eds.). Melanesia: Beyond Diversity. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 33-38.

Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomason, S. & T. Kaufman (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Published

2000-04-01

How to Cite

Thomason, S. G. (2000). On the unpredictability of contact effects. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(1), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v1i1.173