Authorial Identity

A Graduate Student Odyssey

Authors

  • Heather K Olson Beal Stephen F. Austin State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i1.31

Keywords:

authorial identity, discourse community, rhetorical strategies, citation styles, referencing conventions

Abstract

Doctoral students who seek to become part of what Geertz called “intellectual villages” (Geertz 1983: 157) must acculturate themselves into the ways of being, knowing, and especially writing in an academic discourse community. In this autobiographical case study, I use the academic writing I produced as a doctoral student to explore the process of developing an academic identity. I analyzed my writing for the absence or presence of the following rhetorical strategies: referencing conventions, use or avoidance of the scholarly I, and use of questions in the text. This critical examination of my writing illustrates the ways in which I experimented with my emerging academic identity as I struggled to begin participating meaningfully in the ongoing conversation within the discourse community I sought to join.

Author Biography

  • Heather K Olson Beal, Stephen F. Austin State University

    Heather K. Olson Beal received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Louisiana State University. She is currently an Assistant Professor of Secondary Education at Stephen F. Austin State University, where she teaches courses in student diversity, educational foundations, classroom management, and literacy. Her scholarship examines the issues of school choice, second language education, and the educational experiences of immigrant students.

References

American Psychological Association (APA) (2001) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th edition). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

Baynham, M. (1999) Double-voicing and the scholarly “I”: On incorporating the words of others in academic discourse. Text 19: 485–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.485.

Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. and Ackerman, J. (1988) Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English 22: 9–44. http://www.ncte.org/journals/rte/issues/v22-1.

Boughey, C. (2000) Multiple metaphors in an understanding of academic literacy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 6: 279–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698740.

Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1998) Freedom, form, function: Varieties of academic discourse. In J. Z. Schmidt (ed.) Women/Writing/Teaching, 179–197. Albany: State University of New York.

Burke, K. (1967) The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Coffin, C. (2009) Incorporating and evaluating voices in a Film Studies thesis. Writing & Pedagogy 1(2): 163–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.163.

Coniam, D. (2004) Concordancing oneself: Constructing individual textual profiles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 271–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.163.

Delpit, L. (2006) Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New York: The New Press.

Denzin, N. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dowdey, D. (1992) Citation and documentation across the curriculum. In M. Secor and D. Charney (eds.) Constructing Rhetorical Education 330–351. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Elbow, P. (1973) Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Emig, J. (1972) The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. NCTE Research Report No. 13. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

Gee, J. P. (1989) Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education 171: 5–25. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ399918.

Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

Geertz, C. (1988) Words and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Graff, G. (2007) Our undemocratic curriculum. In R. Feal (ed.) Profession 128–135. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.

Graff, G. and Birkenstein, C. (2006) They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

Hendricks, M. and Quinn, L. (2000) Teaching referencing as an introduction to epistemological empowerment. Teaching in Higher Education 5: 447–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713699175.

Herrington, A. (1985) Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English 19: 331–359. http://www.ncte.org/journals/rte/issues/v19-4.

Heyl, B. (2001) Ethnographic interviewing. In Paul Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland (eds.) Handbook of Ethnography 369–383. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Hyland, K. (2002a) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1091–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8.

Hyland, K. (2002b) What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text 22: 529–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.021.

Ivani?, R. (1994) I is for Interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education 6(1): 3–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(94)90018-3.

Ivanic , R. and Camps, D. (2001) I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 3–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0.

John, S. P. (2009) The influence of revision on first person pronoun use in thesis writing. Writing and Pedagogy 1(2): 227–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.227.

Johnson, H. (2001) The PhD student as an adult learner: Using reflective practice to find and speak in her own voice. Reflective Practice 2: 53–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940120035523.

Marshall, M. J. and Barritt, L. S. (1990) Choices made, worlds created: The rhetoric of AERJ. American Educational Research Journal 27: 589–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1163102.

Murray, D. (1972/2003) Teach writing as a process not a product. The Leaflet 11–14. New England Association of Teachers of English. Reprinted in V. Villanueva (ed.) (2003) Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader (2nd edition) 3–6. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

Myerhoff, B. and Ruby, J. (1982) Introduction. In J. Ruby (ed.) A Crack in the Mirror: Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology 1–35. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Olson Beal, H. (2008) Speaking the language of desegregation: A case study of South Boulevard Foreign Language Academic Immersion Magnet. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Louisiana State University.

Richardson, L. (1997) Fields of Play: Constructing an Academic Life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Spivey, N. N. (1997) The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing and the Making of Meaning. San Diego: Academic Press.

Weese, K. L. (1999) Learning from students: An approach to teaching beginning college writers. In K. L. Weese, S. L. Fox and S. Greene (eds.) Teaching Academic Literacy: The Uses of Teacher-research in Developing a Writing Program 3–19. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Published

2014-06-10

Issue

Section

Feature Article

How to Cite

Olson Beal, H. K. (2014). Authorial Identity: A Graduate Student Odyssey. Writing and Pedagogy, 6(1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i1.31

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>