What Vocabulary Should We Teach?
Lexical Frequency Profiles and Lexical Diversity in Second Language Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v5i1.83Keywords:
lexis, L2, writing, lexical frequency profiles, vocabulary, lexical diversity, lexical rangeAbstract
Multiple studies on the relationship between lexical diversity and holistic writing quality in a second language (L2) have consistently shown that a greater number of unique lexical items, compared to the total number of words, is associated with better quality writing. The findings of such studies indicate the importance of vocabulary to L2 writing. However, they provide little information in terms of what vocabulary L2 writers need to learn in order to improve their writing. Despite its limited application in the mid to late 1990s, the use of lexical frequency profiles has not been developed as a method for analyzing the vocabulary of L2 writers’ texts and providing insight as to the vocabulary needed for developing L2 writers. This study constructed two lexical frequency profiles of texts written by a homogeneous group of Spanish-speaking learners of English. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine the contribution of more and less frequent lexical items to the participants’ holistic scores. The results indicated that word types which occur less frequently in the English language contributed significantly to the participants’ holistic scores, despite the relatively low frequency with which they were used in the participants’ essays. These results suggest not only the utility of lexical frequency profiles in teaching and researching L2 writing, but also that L2 writers may benefit from instruction using frequency information. Pedagogical implications are discussed in terms of how L2 writing instructors can incorporate lexical frequency information into direct vocabulary instruction.
References
Bonzo, J. D. (2008) To assign a topic or not: Observing fluency and complexity in intermediate foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals 41: 722–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03327.x.
Cobb, T. (n.d.) Lextutor Vocabprofile BNC Version. Retrieved 15 January 2011 from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/bnc.
Coniam, D. (1999) An investigation into the use of word frequency lists in computing vocabulary profiles. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 103–123.
Corson, D. J. (1985) The Lexical Bar. Oxford: Pergamon. Cited in Nation (2005).
Corson, D. J. (1997) The learning and use of academic English words. Language Learning 47: 671–718. Cited in Nation (2005). doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00025.
Coxhead, A. (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34(2): 213–238. doi: 10.2307/3587951.
Coxhead, A. and Byrd, P. (2007) Preparing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 129–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002.
Engber, C. A. (1995) The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing 4: 139–155. doi: 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7.
Folse, K. (2008) Teaching vocabulary is not the writing teacher’s job. In J. Reid (ed.) Writing Myths 1–17. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Grant, L., and Ginther, A. (2000) Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(2): 123–145. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9.
Heatley, A., Nation, I. S. P., and Coxhead, A. (2002) RANGE [Computer software]. Retrieved 23 June 2010 from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/range.aspx.
Hirsch, D. and Nation, P. (1992) What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language 8: 689–696.
Howell, D. (2007) Statistical Methods for Psychology (6th edition). Belmont, California: Thomson Wadsworth.
Hu, M., and Nation, P. (2000) Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 13: 403–430.
Jarvis, S. (2002) Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19(1): 57–84. doi:10.1191/0265532202lt220oa.
Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D. and Ferris, D. (2003) Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(4): 377–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987a) Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition 15: 256–266. doi: 10.3758/BF03197724.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987b) Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies. Written Communication 4: 269–298. doi: 10.1177/0741088387004003003.
Kellogg, R. T. (1988) Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 14: 355–365.
Kellogg, R. T. (1990) Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology 103: 327–342. doi: 10.2307/1423213.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996) A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy and S. Ransdell (eds.) The Science of Writing 57–71. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001) Competition for working memory among writing processes. The American Journal of Psychology 114: 175–191. doi:10.2307/1423513.
Laufer, B. (1989) What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Laurén and M. Nordman (eds.) Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines 316–323. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Laufer, B. (1994) The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? RELC Journal 25(2): 21–33. doi:10.1177/003368829402500202.
Laufer, B. (1997) The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In C. James and T. Huckin (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy 20–34. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
Laufer, B. (2005) Instructed second language vocabulary learning: The fault in the ‘default hypothesis’. In A. Housen and M. Pierrard (eds.) Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition 311–329. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Laufer, B. and Nation, P. (1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16(3): 307–322. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.307.
Laufer, B. and Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010) Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 22 (1): 15–30.
Lemmouh, Z. (2008) The relationship between grades and the lexical richness of student essays. Nordic Journal of English Studies 7 (3): 163–180.
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N. and Durán, P. (2004) Lexical Diversity and Language Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230511804.
Manchon, R., Murphy, L. and Roca de Larios, J. (2007) Lexical retrieval process strategies in second language writing: A synthesis of empirical research. International Journal of English Studies 7(2): 149–174.
McCarthy, P. M. (2005) An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD). Dissertation Abstracts International 66: 12 (UMI No. 3199485).
McCarthy, P. M. and Jarvis, S. (2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42: 381–392. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.381.
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A. and McCarthy, P. M. (2010) Linguistic features of writing quality, Written Communication 27: 57–86. doi: 10.1177/0741088309351547.
Meara, P. (2005) Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied Linguistics 26(1): 32–47. doi:10.1093/applin/amh037.
Nation, I. S. P. (2005) Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning 581–595. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 63: 59–82.
Tabachnik, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics (5th edition). Boston: Pearson.
West, M. (1953), A General Service List of English Words, with Semantic Frequencies and a Supplementary Word-List for the Writing of Popular Science and Technology. London: Longman.
Yu, G. (2010) Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 236–259. doi:10.1093/applin/amp024.
