Templated Pedagogy
Factors Affecting Standardized Writing Pedagogy with Online Learning Management Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v5i1.105Keywords:
Vista, online writing instruction, learning management system tools, standardization of writing pedagogy toolsAbstract
The use of online course or learning management system (LMS) tools proliferates as writing instruction grows online along with administrative concerns to improve teaching efficiencies and program assessment. While many institutions use the template feature in LMS systems (e.g. Blackboard Vista) to generate a location for teacher resources, some institutions are using LMS tools to standardize course content, delivery, and pedagogy to varying degrees. However, digital literacy issues that affect both teachers and students can negatively impact teaching and learning with LMS tools, especially in Web-based settings. It is important to understand how such tools may or may not be used effectively in standardizing writing pedagogy, particularly how designers’ unfamiliarity with course content and their own and their students’ inexperience with the tools can negatively affect pedagogy and learning with such tools. I describe a specific example of problems encountered within an extreme form of standardization in a Web-based writing course delivered via WebCT/Vista, identify implications of such standardization, and suggest considerations that educators should be aware of in their efforts to standardize writing pedagogy through LMS tools.
References
Arif, A. A. (2001) Learning from the Web: Are students ready or not? Educational Technology & Society 4(4). Retrieved on February 14, 2011 from http://www.ifets.info/journals/4_4/arif.html.
College Composition and Communicative Conference Committee on Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction (2011a) Report of the Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. Retrieved on 18 April 2011 from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Groups/CCCC/Committees/OWI_State-of-Art_Report_April_2011.pdf.
College Composition and Communicative Conference Committee on Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction (2011b) Committee on OWI: Survey of fully online distance-based instruction. Retrieved on 18 April 2011 from http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsSurveyResultsPage.aspx?ID=L246LPBS94AZ.
Educational Partners, LLC (2007) Teachers as writers: Impact on student achievement. Retrieved on 8 November 2007 from http://www.youreducationalpartners.com/Writingpage.htm.
Foltz, C. B., O’Hara, M. T. and Wise, H. (2004) Standardizing the MIS course: Benefits and pitfalls. Campus-Wide Information Systems 21: 163–169.
Haas, C. (1996) Writing Technology: Studies in the Materiality of Literacy. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Hewett, B. L. and Robidoux, C. (eds.) (2010) Virtual Collaborative Writing in the Workplace: Technologies and Processes. Hershey: IGI Global.
Hong, K., Lai, K. and Holton, D. (2003) Students’ satisfaction and perceived learning with a web-based course. Educational Technology & Society 6 (1) 116–124. Retrieved on 14 February 14 2011 from http://www.ifets.info/journals/6_1/hong.pdf.
Jaschick, S. (2010) When writing class moves online. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved on 31 January 2011 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/03/19/writing.
Kriger, T. J. (2001) A virtual revolution: Trends in the expansion of distance education. United States Distance Learning Association Journal 15: 11.
Lane, L. M. (2009) Insidious pedagogy: How course management systems impact teaching. First Monday 14. Retrieved on 28 January 2011 http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/2530/2303#author.
Lynch, M. M. (2001) Effective student preparation for online learning. The Technology Source Nov./Dec. Retrieved on 14 February 2011 from http://technologysource.org/article/effective_student_preparation_for_online_learning/.
Morgan, G. (2003) Faculty Use of Course Management Systems. Boulder: Educause. Retrieved on 8 April 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0302/rs/ers0302w.pdf.
Mott, J. (2010) Envisioning the post-LMS era: The open learning network. Educause Quarterly, 33. Retrieved on 30 January 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/EnvisioningthePostLMSEraTheOpe/199389.
Nagar, S. (2010) Study of learning management systems and its effects on distance education. International Journal of Educational Administration 2: 323–327.
National Commission on Writing (2006) Writing and school reform. National Writing Project, May 1, 2006. Retrieved on 8 April 2011 from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2432.
Nelson, J. L. (2003) Academic freedom, institutional integrity and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly 30: 65–72.
Norman, D. A. (2002) The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
Remley, D. (2009, January 19) Intersectional computer-supported collaboration in business writing: Learning through challenged performance. Special issue on Writing Technologies and Writing Across the Curriculum. Across the Disciplines 6. Retrieved on 20 March 2011 from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/technologies/remley.cfm.
Report of Spellings Commission on Higher Education (2007). Retrieved on 20 April 2011 from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf.
Samuels, R. (2004) The future threat to computers and composition: Nontenured instructors, intellectual property, and distance education. Computers and Composition 21: 63–71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.006.
Samuels, R. (2007) Revealing codes: Cognitive mapping of writing, computers, and grants at the postmodern university. Kairos 7(3). Retrieved on 10 April 2011 from http://www.technorhetoric.net/7.3/coverweb/samuels/kairos-writing.html.
Selfe, C. L. (1999) Technology and Literacy in the Twenty-first Century: The Importance of Paying Attention. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Selfe, C. L. (2007) Multimodal Composition: Resources for Teachers. New York: Hampton Press.
Shaver, L. D., and Shaver, P. M. (2005) Issues in standardizing the basic course in communication: Faculty visions versus administrative realities now and in the future. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Retrieved on March 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED387843&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED387843.
Simmons, J. (2001) Educational technology and academic freedom. Techne 5(3): 82–95. Retrieved on 11 April 2011 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/incoming/v5n3/simmons(ce).pdf.
University of Houston (2007). FAQs on Vista. Accessed on April 7, 2011 from http://blogs.bauer.uh.edu/instructional-design/ttg/blackboard-vista/.
Writing Study Group of the Executive Council of NCTE (2004) NCTE Beliefs about the Teaching of Writing. National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved on 10 April 2011 from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/writingbeliefs.
