From Typing to Touching
A Review of Writing with Natural User Interfaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i1.127Keywords:
computers, digital, critical, rhetoric, technologyAbstract
As Natural User Interfaces (NUIs) grow increasingly common, this article investigates what they might do with/for writing and say about the teaching of writing. Specifically, I review three NUI writing projects, critically examining the rhetorical features of the projects and investigating the relationship between NUIs and Graphic User Interfaces (GUIs). Ultimately, I argue that NUIs are not “natural” interfaces but are as historically and socially grounded as GUIs; even so, NUIs hold the potential to invigorate a critical and activities based pedagogy, placing new focus on socially constructed meanings, material interactions, and embodied performances.
References
Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E. and Weiss, M. (2009) Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. Cell Biology Education 8(3): 203–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025.
Baudrillard, J. (1988) America. London: Verso.
Brock, K. and Rieder, D. (2013) Kinecting together: Writing and gesture through NUI technologies. Itineration: Cross-disciplinary Studies in Rhetoric, Media, and Culture. Retrieved on 30 September 2013 from http://itineration.org/submission_pages/kinect/.
Brock, K. and Rieder, D. (2011) embody(text){. ID:Entity, Special Exhibition. Raleigh Contemporary Museum of Art.
Cayley, J. (2002) Code is not the text: Unless it is the text. Retrieved on 1 December 2013 from http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/literal.
Cayley, J. (2010) The gravity of the leaf: Phenomenologies of literary inscription in media-constituted diegetic worlds. In P. Gendolla and J. Schäfer (eds.) Beyond the Screen: Transformations of Literary Structures, Interfaces and Genres 199–226. Bielefeld: Media Upheavals.
Cleveland Art (2013) Gallery One. Retrieved on 1 June 2013 at http://www.clevelandart.org/gallery-one.
Dempsey, S. E. (2009) The increasing technological divide: Persistent portrayals of maverick masculinity in US marketing. Feminist Media Studies 9(1): 37–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680770802619482.
Derrida, J. (1997) Of grammatology (trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Didion, J. (1976) Why I write. New York Times Book Review. 5 December 1976. Retrived on 7 December 2013 at http://people.bridgewater.edu/~atrupe/ENG310/Didion.pdf.
Drucker, J. (2009) Speclab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feenberg, A. (1992) Subversive rationalization: Technology, power and democracy. Inquiry Sept/Dec: 301–322.
Feenberg, A. (2008) From the critical theory of technology to the rational critique of rationality. Social Epistemology 22(1): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691720701773247.
Flanagan, M. (2004) ‘Next Level’: Women’s digital activism through gaming. In G. Liestøl, A. Morrison and T. Rasmussen, T. (eds.) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains 359–388. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Gallery One (2013) Transforming the art museum experience. Museums & the Web. Retrieved on 1 December 2013 from http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/transforming-the-art-museum-experience-gallery-one-2/.
Haraway, D. (1991) A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature 149–181. New York: Routledge.
Jenkins, H. (2012) Introduction: Should we discipline the reading of comics? In M. J. Smith and R. Duncan (eds.) Critical Approaches to Comics: Theories and Methods 1–14. New York: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993) Gesture and Speech (trans. Anna Bostock Berger). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Lupton, D. (2000) The embodied computer/user. In D. Bell and B. Kennedy (eds.) The Cybercultures Reader 471–477. New York: Routledge.
Manovich, L. (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Myo, wearable gesture controlled technology (2013) Thalmic Labs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWu9TFJjHaM.
Paasonen, S. (2005) Figures of Fantasy: Internet, Women & Cyberdiscourse. New York: Peter Lang.
Phelps, P. H. (2008) Teaching transformation. Teaching Professor 22 (December): 2–3.
Rice, J. E. (2005) Meta/Physical graffiti: ‘Getting up’ as affective writing model. JAC 25(1): 131–160.
Rice, J.E. (2008) The new new: Making the case for critical affect studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech 94(2): 200–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630801975434.
Rieder, D. (2013) From GUI to NUI: Microsoft’s Kinect and the politics of the (body as) interface. Present Tense 3(1): 1–9.
Selfe, C. L. and Selfe, R. J., Jr. (1994) The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. CCC 45(4): 480–504. Retrieved on 1 December 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/358761.
Van Uytven, R. (2002) Production and Consumption in the Low Countries, 13th–16th Centuries. London: Variorum.
Wysoki, A. (2004) Writing New Media: Theory and Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Wysoki, A. and Arola, K. (2012) Composing Media Composing Embodiment. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Zinsser, W. (1976/2006) On Writing Well. New York: Harper.
