Tackling text types through grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.31813Keywords:
Academic writing, Teaching writing, functional grammar, text analysis, English language learners, reader-writer interactionAbstract
This article addresses the challenge of writing instruction in a standards-based environment where students are accountable for mastering different genres and text types. The Common Core State Standards (CCSS), now adopted by the majority of states in the USA, provide exemplars of successful papers in the different disciplines, but offer no guidelines for teaching, particularly to inexperienced writers or English language learners. Since a text in any genre can be developed in a limitless variety of ways, students need a methodology for analyzing effective texts, and for developing their own. This article proposes that focusing on grammatical choice offers an entry point into understanding the craft of Explanations and Arguments. To illustrate, four samples of high school writing are analyzed from the published CCSS exemplars: two Explanations and two Arguments, all with very different purposes and development. The analysis demonstrates the central role that grammar plays in constructing these differences. Specifically, the analysis focuses on information management across noun groups for the Explanations, and on verb choice and modality for the Arguments. Drawing on functional grammar insights, this article proposes a pathway for students from the analysis of model texts to the effective construction of their own.
References
Christie, F. and Derewianka, B. (2008) School discourse. NY: Continuum.
de Oliveira, L. C., Maune, M. and Klassen, M. (2014) The Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts in the United States and teaching English Language Learners: Focus on writing. Educational Studies in Language and Literature 14: 1--13.
Derewianka, B. (2003) Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal 34.2: 133--154.
Derewianka, B. (1990) Exploring how texts work. NSW, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
Duff, P.A., Ferreira, A., and Zappa-Hollman, S. (2015) Putting (functional) grammar to work in content-based English for Academic Purpose instruction. In M. Christison, D. Christian, P. A. Duff, and N. Spada (eds.) Teaching and learning English grammar 139--157. NY: Taylor & Francis.
Gibbons, P. (2002) Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hasan, R. (1989) The structure of a text. In M.A.K. Halliday & R. Hasan (eds.) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective 52--69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macken-Horarik, M. 2002 Something to shoot for: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A.M. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives 17--42. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Martin, J. R. (2002) Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 52--74.
Moore, T. (2010) The ‘processes’ of learning: On the uses of Halliday’s transitivity in academic skills advising. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis and K. O’Halloran (eds.) Applied Linguistics Methods: A reader 52-71. New York: Routledge.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (2010a) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Appendix A: Research Supporting Key Elements of the Standards & Glossary of Key Terms. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved on August 12, 2016 from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf National
Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (2010b) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved August 12, 2016 from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (2010c) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Appendix C: Samples of Student Writing. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved August 12, 2016 from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_C.pdf
Nesi, H. & Gardner, S. (2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Pennington, M.A. (2016) A 3-D Approach to Discovering and Creating the Features of Written Texts. Writing & Pedagogy 8.1: 117-147.
Pennington, M.A. (2013) Evolutionary trends in writing pedagogy: An early 21st century view. Writing and Pedagogy 5.1: 1-22.
Schleppegrell, M. (2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swales, J. M. (2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
