Orality, literacy, and the representation of thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.33544Keywords:
Orality, LiteracyAbstract
Oral traditions have been limited in their ability to present the full range of a character’s experiences, focusing for the most part on overt actions rather than a character’s inner thoughts. The invention of writing has given writers the ability to reach a distant and often unknown audience and the leisure to mold language in new ways. Writers have thus acquired the ability to place a reader inside a character’s thoughts, either as they are experienced from the inside with mimesis, or by commenting on them omnisciently from the outside with diegesis. Examples are provided of each method of presentation.
References
Chafe, Wallace (Forthcoming). Thought-Based Linguistics: How Languages Turn Thoughts into Sounds. Cambridge University Press.
Cohn, Dorrit (1978). Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Corballis, Michael C. (2015). The Wandering Mind: What the Brain Does When you’re Not Looking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Eliot, George (1872). Middlemarch. Blackwood.
Joyce, James (1916). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. New York: B.W. Huebsch.
Lüthi, Max (1970). Once Upon a Time: On the Nature of Fairy Tales. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
McHale, Brian (1978). Free Indirect Discourse: a Survey of Recent Accounts. PTL: a Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 3: 249-287.
Opie, Iona and Peter. (1974). The Classic Fairy Tales. Oxford University Press.