What is Behind Yinshun’s Re-statement of the Nature of the Mulamadhyamakakarika? Debates on the Creation of a New Mahayana in Twentieth-century China

Authors

  • Stefania Travagnin University of Manchester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v29i2.251-272

Keywords:

Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Nāgārjuna, Yinshun, Jizang, Buddhism in modern China and Taiwan

Abstract

Yinshun (1906–2005) is regarded as one of the most eminent monks in twentieth-century Chinese Buddhism. Previous research has argued that Yinshun especially undertook the mission of writing new commentaries on Madhyamaka texts. His efforts provoked a revival of interest towards the Madhyamaka school among contemporary Chinese Buddhists, and a re-assessment of the position of the writings of Nagarjuna within the history of Chinese Buddhism. This article focuses on Yinshun’s restatement of the nature of the Mulamadhyamakakarika, a text that has always been regarded as fundamental in the Madhyamaka/San-lun tradition in China. The first part analyzes Yinshun’s textual study of the Mulamadhyamakakarika, examining his approach to the text, and how he came to terms with previous Chinese traditional textual scholarship and canonical scriptures. The second part discusses Yinshun’s interpretation of the text by moving away from the micro-context of Chinese San-lun scholarship, and addressing the macro-context of the modern Chinese understanding of the Mahayana.

Author Biography

  • Stefania Travagnin, University of Manchester
    Stefania Travagnin is Lecturer in Buddhist Thought and Practice in the Department of Religions and Theology at the University of Manchester. She holds a PhD in the Study of Religions from SOAS, London (2009), has extensive fieldwork experience in East Asia, and has previously taught at the University of London (SOAS and Goldsmiths College), University of Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, and Pennsylvania State University. Her research and publications focus on different aspects of Buddhism in twentieth-century China and Taiwan. Her volume Taiwanese Madhyamaka? The Monk Yinshun (1906-2005) and his Study on Da zhidu lun is forthcoming in 2013 (London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.).

References

T1509 Da zhidu lun

T1521 Shi zhu piposha lun

T1564 Zhong lun

T1565 Shun zhong lun

T1566 Banruo denglun shi

T1567 Dacheng zhongguan shi lun

T1568 Shi’er men lun

T1569 Bai lun

T1824 Zhongguan lun shu

Changxing. 1937. ‘Xiandai zhongguo fojiao’. Haichao yin 18 (6): 5–9.

Chen Xueren. 1999. ‘Luelun zhonglun yu ahan jing de guanxi’. Xiangguang zhuangyan 57: 78–84.

———. 2000. Longshu pusa zhonglun ba bu sixiang tanjiu. Gaoxiong: Foguang.

Dao’an. 1981. Dao’an fashi yiji 12 vols. Taipei: Dao’an fashi jinianhui.

Dongchu. 1974. Zhongguo fojiao jindai shi 2 vols. Taipei: Dongchu.

Fafang. 1937. ‘Yijiusanliunian de zhongguo fojiao’. Haichao yin 18(4): 13–23.

Gregory, Peter N. 1991. Tsung-mi and the sinification of Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hobsbawm, Eric and Terence Ranger, eds. 1993. The invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huang Ruikai. 2002. ‘Xing kong sixiang yanjiu de yige mianxiang: panding “zhonglun shi ahan tonglun” de zonghe shengsi’. Available on-line from: www.yinshun.org.tw/91thesis/91-03A.doc (10 January 2004).

Huimin. 1986. Zhongguan yu yuqie. Taipei: Dongchu.

Jones, Charles B. 1999. Buddhism in Taiwan: Religion and state. Honolulu: Hawai’i University Press.

Lan Jifu. 1991. Ershi shiji de Zhong-Ri fojiao. Taipei: Xin

———. 1993. Zhongguo fojiao fanlun. Taipei: Xin wenfeng.

Liu, Ming-wood. 1994. Madhyamaka Thought In China. Leiden: Brill.

Madsen, Richard. 2007. Democracy’s Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520252271.001.0001

Maeda Eun (Zhu Yuanshan, tr.).1920. Sanronshu koyo. Tokyo: Heigo Shuppan-sha.

Palmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics. Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Petzold, Bruno. 1982. Die Quintessenz der T’ian t’ai (Tendai) lehre: eine comparative untersuching. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Pittman, Don A. 2001. Toward a Modern Chinese Buddhism: Taixu’s Reforms. Honolulu: Hawai’i University Press.

Qiu Minjie. 2000. Yinshun daoshi de fojiao sixiang. Taipei: Fajie.

Robinson, Richard. 1967. Early Madhyamika in India and China. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Rushi. 2001. Xiandai dacheng qi xin lun — rushi fashi lunwen ji. Nantou: Nanlin.

Ruyong. 2002. ‘Yinshun fashi de “Zhonglun shi ahan jing de tonglun” zhi tanjiu’. 2001 nian foxue lunwen jiangxuejin de jiang lunwen ji 2001, 57–85.

Song Zelai. 2000. Bei beipan de fotuo. Taipei: Qianyi.

———. 2001. Bei beipan de fotuo xuji. Taipei: Qianyi.

Taixu. 1936. ‘Wangsheng jingtu lun jiangyao’. In Taixu dashi quanshu, v.7, 2654–2655.

———. 1937. ‘Tingjiang Xiandai zhongguo fojiao zhi hou’. Haichao yin 18(6): 10–12.

———.1942. ‘Faxing konghui xue gailun’. In Taixu dashi quanshu, 5: 808–825.

Teramoto, Enga tr. 1937. Ryuju jo. Chuson muisho. Tokyo: Daito Shuppansha.

Travagnin, Stefania. 2001. ‘Il Nuovo “Buddhismo per l’Umanità” (renjian fojiao) a Taiwan. Una nota sulla classificazione degli insegnamenti (panjiao) secondo il Maestro Yinshun.’ Cina 29: 65–102.

———. 2009. The Madhyamaka Dimension of Yinshun. A Re-statement of the School of Nagarjuna in Twentieth-Century Chinese Buddhism, PhD dissertation, SOAS University of London.

Wan Jinchuan. 1995. Longshu de yuyan gainian. Nantou: Zhengguan.

———.1998. Zhongguan sixiang jianglu. Jiayi: Xiangguang shuxiang.

Welch, Holmes. 1967. The Practice of Chinese Buddhism (1900–1950). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1968. The Buddhist Revival in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1972. Buddhism Under Mao. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wen Jinke. 2001. Jicheng yu pipan Yinshun fashi renjian fojiao sixiang. Taipei: Modern Chan Society.

Yinshun. 1941. ‘Fa hai tan zhen’. Huayu ji 4: 71–113.

———. 1942. Yindu zhi Fojiao. Chengdu: Zhengwen xueshe.

———. 1949. Fofa gailun. Hong Kong: Xianghai lianshe.

———. 1950. Zhongguan jinlun. Hongkong: Xianghai lianshe.

———. 1952. Zhongguan lun song jiangji. Hongkong: Xianghai lianshe.

———. 1960. Cheng fo zhi dao, Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. (Fayen S.K. Koo tr.). 1965. ‘The Madhyamika Doctrine: A Modern Restatement.’ Haichao yin 46 no.3: 25–27.

———. 1968. Shuo yiqie youbu weizhu de lunshu yu lunshi zhi yanjiu. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1971a. Fo zai renjian. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1971b. Yuanshi fojiao shengdian zhi jicheng. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1974. ‘Youxin fahai liushinian’. Huayu ji 5: 1–60.

———. 1981a. Rulaizang zhi yanjiu. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1981b. Chuqi dacheng fojiao zhi qiyuan yu kaizhan. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1985. Kong zhi tanjiu. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1988. Yindu fojiao sixiang shi. Taipei: Zhengwen.

———. 1989. ‘Qili qiji zhi renjian fojiao’. Huayu ji 4: 1–70.

———. 1993. Da zhidu lun zhi zuozhe jiqi fanyi. Taipei: Zhengwen.

Yu Heng. 2005. Yinshun fashi de beiai. Yi xiandai chan de zhiyi xiansuo. Taipei: Fojiao zhengjue tongxiuhui.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Travagnin, S. (2013). What is Behind Yinshun’s Re-statement of the Nature of the Mulamadhyamakakarika? Debates on the Creation of a New Mahayana in Twentieth-century China. Buddhist Studies Review, 29(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v29i2.251-272