Defining Engaged Buddhism
Traditionists, Modernists, and Scholastic Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v30i2.261Keywords:
Engaged Buddhism, Orientalism, scholar-practitionerAbstract
Thomas F. Yarnall’s 2003 categories of ‘modernist’ and ‘traditionist’, used to classify accounts of the origins of engaged Buddhism, have proven useful as methodological tools but today need considerable reevaluation. This article investigates two more recent accounts dealing with engaged Buddhism — David Loy’s The Great Awakening and Sallie B. King’s Socially Engaged Buddhism — in order to critique and ultimately to go beyond Yarnall’s categories. It touches on questions concerning the legitimacy and obligations of scholars in defining Buddhism for practitioners and for fellow academics, and makes the case that a significant shift is needed in order to avoid problems of Orientalism at work in some academic accounts of engaged Buddhism.
References
Baumann, Martin. 2002. ‘Protective Amulets and Awareness Techniques, or How to Make Sense of Buddhism in the West.’ In Westward Dharma: Buddhism Beyond Asia, ed. Charles S. Prebish and Martin Baumann, 51–65. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buddhist Ethics Network, http://buddhistethics.net/ (13 June 2013), Network Members>Page 2>Sallie King: http://buddhistethics.net/index.php/networkmembers/itemlist/user/118-sallieking.html
Carman, Jack. 2010. ‘Scriptural Continuity Between Traditional and Engaged Buddhism’. Master’s thesis, California State University.
Goméz, Luis O. 1995. ‘Oriental Wisdom and the Cure of Souls: Jung and the Indian East.’ In Curators of the Buddha: the study of Buddhism under colonialism, edited by Donald S. Lopez Jr, 197–250. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, Roger and John Makransky. 2000. Buddhist Theology: Critical Reflections by Contemporary Buddhist Scholars. Richmond, VA: Curzon.
Jones, Ken. 1989. The Social Face of Buddhism. London: Wisdom Publications.
King, Sallie B. 2009. Socially Engaged Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Loy, David. 2003. The Great Awakening: a Buddhist social theory. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
———. www.davidloy.org (13 June 2013), David R. Loy.
Malkin, John. 2003. ‘In Engaged Buddhism, Peace Begins With You.’ Shambhala Sun, July 2003: http://www.shambhalasun.com/index.php?option=content&task=view &id=1579.
Pierce, Lori. 2010. ‘Buddhist Modernism in English-Language Buddhist Periodicals.’ In Issei Buddhism in the Americas, edited by Duncan Ryûken Williams and Tomoe Moriya, 87–109. University of Illinois.
Prebish, Charles S. 2002. ‘Studying the Spread of Buddhism in the West: The Emergence of Western Buddhism as a New Subdiscipline within Buddhist Studies.’ In Westward Dharma: Buddhism Beyond Asia, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Martin Baumann, 66–84. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Queen, Christopher. 2003. ‘Introduction: From Altruism to Activism.’ In Action Dharma, edited by Christopher Queen, Charles Prebish and Damien Keown, 1–36. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. Toronto: Random House.
Tweed, Thomas A. 2002. ‘Who Is A Buddhist? Night-Stand Buddhists and Other Creatures: Sympathizers, Adherents, and the Study of Religion.’ I In Westward Dharma: Buddhism Beyond Asia, edited by Charles S. Prebish and Martin Baumann, 17–33. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Yarnall, Thomas F. 2003. ‘Engaged Buddhism: New and Improved? Made in the USA of Asian materials.’ In Action Dharma, edited by Christopher Queen, Charles Prebish and Damien Keown, 286–344. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
