Grammar, Writing, and Technology
A Sample Technology-supported Approach to Teaching Grammar and Improving Writing for ESL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i2.257-279Keywords:
ESL Writing and Grammar, Learner Corpus, Web-based Resource Development, XML/XSL, InteractivityAbstract
English language learners are frequently unable to benefit from the prevailing process-writing approaches due to a lack of grammar and vocabulary knowledge relevant to academic writing. This paper describes how the need for explicit grammar instruction as part of preparing students to write can be addressed by using a collection of learner texts and transforming that collection into an online grammar resource for intermediate nonnative speakers (NNS) of English. Drawing on research in grammar and writing, the use of learner texts, and online interactivity, we outline the development and the prototype of the Internet Writing Resource for the Innovative Teaching of English (iWRITE). We discuss how the judicious use of advanced technology (e.g., XML) facilitated the implementation of iWRITE, an example of one possible approach to embodying aspects of second language acquisition (SLA) theory while taking advantage of the Web's potential for interactivity.
References
Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2002). Lexis in contrast: Corpus-based approaches. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
Calverley, G., & Shephard, K. (2003). Assisting the uptake of on-line resources: Why good learning resources are not enough. Computers & Education, 41 (3), 205-224.
Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 22-34. Retrieved September 22, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (3), 265-279.
Cowan, R., Choi, H. E., & Kim, D. H. (2003). Four questions for error diagnosis and correction in CALL. CALICO Journal, 20 (3), 451-463.
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Granger, S. (1993). International corpus of learner English. In J. M. G. Aarts, P. d. Haan, & N. Oostdijk (Eds.), English language corpora: Design, analysis and exploitation: Papers from the thirteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Nijmegen 1992 (pp. 57-71). Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA.
Granger, S. (1994). Learner Corpus: A revolution in applied linguistics. English Today, 10 (3), 25-29.
Granger, S., & Rayson, P. (1998). Automatic profiling of learner texts. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 119-131). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Granger, S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: Form-focused instruction and data-driven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 199-211). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15 (1), 17-27.
Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33 (1), 76-88.
Hegelheimer, V. (2003). iWRITE [Web application]. available at http://iwrite.engl.iastate. edu/placement/]. Ames, IA: Author.
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 30-42.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Teaching grammar in writing classes: Tenses and cohesion. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 181-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37 (2), 275-301.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow, Essex: Longman
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. London: Longman.
Kuo, C.-H., Wible, D., Chen, M.-C., Sung, L.-C., Tsao, N.-L., & Chio, C.-L. (2002). The design of an intelligent web-based interactive language learning lystem. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27 (3), 229-248.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia, (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lorenz, G. (1998). Overstatement in advanced learnersʼ writing: Stylistic aspects of adjective intensification. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Maddux, C. D. (2002). The web in education: A case of unrealized potential. Computers in the Schools, 19 (1/2), 7-17.
Meunier, F. (2002). The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 119142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Milton, J. (1998). Exploiting L1 and interlanguage corpora in the design of an electronic language learning and production environment. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 186-198). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Milton, J., & Tsang, E. (1993) A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students writing. In R. Pemberton & E. Tsang (Eds.) Studies in lexis. (215-246) Hong Kong: HKUST.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Phinney, M. (1996). Exploring the virtual world: Computers in the second language writing classroom. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 137-152). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
Pica, T. (1994, September). The language learnerʼs environment as a resource for linguistic input? A review of theory and research. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 105106, 69-116.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santos, T. (1988). Professorsʼ reactions to the academic writing of non-native speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (1), 69-90.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Vann, R., Lorenz, F., & Meyer, D. E. (1991). Error gravity: Response to errors in the written discourse of nonnative speakers of English. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing (pp. 181-196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Vann, R. J., Meyer, D. E., & Lorenz, F. (1984). Error Gravity: A Study of faculty opinion of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly, 18 (3), 427-440.
Virtanen, T. (1996). Exploiting the international corpus of learner English (ICLE). AFinLAn vuosikirja, 54, 157-166.
Wible, D., Kuo, C.-H., Chien, F.-Y., Liu, A., & Tsao, N.-L. (2001). A web-based EFL writing environment: Integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers. Computers & Education, 37( 3-4), 297-315.
