Who Blogs? Understanding the Correlation of Personality and Blogging in Cross-Cultural Discussions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v30i0.92-117Keywords:
Blogging, personality, altruism, openness, conscientiousness, cross-culturalAbstract
Second language teaching strategies have long evolved with changes in educational technology. In today’s Web 2.0 environment, we strive to ensure students richly participate in computer-mediated communicative (CMC) activities so as to expand students’ target language and/or target culture knowledge. One key element lacking in the literature is the importance of knowing who our students are in relation to what they do in the CMC environment. The Big Five personality inventory has previously helped researchers to identify the association of openness, agreeableness, neuroticism, extraversion and conscientiousness with social Internet use, particularly highlighting that those who choose to blog are high in extraversion and high in neuroticism. This present study of cross-cultural blogging in a L2 teaching methods course tracked students’ blogging habits and commentary in conjunction with an analysis of their personality types. This mixed-methods study revealed that openness and conscientiousness were the strongest predictors of interaction in CMC cross-cultural discussions. As we engage students in blogging, unveiling the role of personality will help educators to enhance interaction and learning within CMC cultural discussions. Knowing how personality types can impact participation can allow for improved course and activity design and enhance active and engaged conversation to the benefit of all.
References
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71-80.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. Cyber-Psychology and Behavior, 5, 125-128.
Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41(3-4), 453-472.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job per-formance: A meta-analysis. Personal Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Beauvois, M. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455-464.
Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198-217.
Blevins, D. G. (2007). Story telling or storied telling? Media’s pedagogical ability to shape narrative as a form of “knowing”. Religious Education, 102(3), 250-263.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychology Assessment, 4, 5-13.
de Bruyn, L. L. (2004). Monitoring online communication. Can the development of con-vergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? Dis-tance Education, 25, 67-81.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Digman, J. M. (1989). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Dingman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2005). Exploring the blogosphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 410-421.
Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
Ellison, N. B., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multi-media and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99-122.
Fischer, R. A. (1989). Instructional computing in French: The student view. Foreign Lan-guage Annals, 22(1), 79-90.
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring stu-dents’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 409-442.
Fischer, R., & Farris, M. (1999). The Libra multimedia authoring environment and CALL multimedia courseware. CALICO Journal, 17(1), 59-82.
Fotos, S., & Browne, E. (2004). New perspectives on CALL for second language class-rooms. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Emerging technologies: Blogs and Wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12-16.
González-Bueno, M. (1998). The effects of electronic mail on Spanish L2 discourse. Lan-guage Learning & Technology, 1(2), 55-70.
Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Eno, C. A. (2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1993-2004.
Hamburger, Y. A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). Relationship between extraversion and neuroti-cism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441-449.
Hanson-Smith, E. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages(pp. 107-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as bridging genre. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 142-171.
Hough, L. M. (1997). The millennium for personality psychology: New horizons and good old daze. Applied Psychology International Review, 47, 233-261.
Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C.-C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology ac-ceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information and Management, 45, 65-74.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Springer.
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
Kaiser, S., Müller-Seitz, G., Lopes, M. P., & Cunha, M. P. (2007). Weblog-technology as a trigger to elicit passion for knowledge. Organization, 14(3), 391-412.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educa-tional contexts. Computers in Education, 51, 1342-1352.
Lawler, E. E. (1994). Motivation in work organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist,52(5): 509-16.
McIntyre, P. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 564-576.
McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychol-ogy Review, 4, 57-75.
Merriam-Webster (2010). Word of the Day. http://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/.
Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Sociocollaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. E. (2006). The Five-Factor Model personality assessment for improved student design team performance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(5), 517-529.
Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., & Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students› attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409-430.
Pinkman, K., & Gakuin, K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: En-couraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12-24.
Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2007). High-tech inspires the read/write website. The Education Digest, 72(9), 14-18.
Schulz, R. (2007). The challenge of assessing cultural understanding in the context of for-eign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 9-18.
Shield, L. & Weininger, M. J. (1999). Collaboration in a virtual world: Groupwork and the distance language learner. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), World CALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 99-116). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Shrum, J., & Glisan, E. (2010). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th Edition). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sun, Y.-C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88-103.
Trier, J. (2007). “Cool” engagements with YouTube: Part 1. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 408-412.
Tu, C. J., Blocher, M., & Gayle, R. (2008). Constructs for Web 2.0 learning environments: A theatrical metaphor. Educational Media International, 45(4), 253-269.
Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 447-461.
