Computer-Mediated Grammar Teaching and its Effect on Language Acquisition over Time
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v30i0.166-186Keywords:
Computer-mediated grammar teaching, learning online, short-term and cumulative effect of online grammar instructionAbstract
When and to what extent one should teach grammar to language learners has been discussed extensively in theoretical and pedagogical literature. Even though grammar continues to hold an important place in language teaching, there is still much controversy with regard to what works best. This article looks at the question of computer-mediated grammar teaching and its effect on language acquisition over time. In particular, it reports the results of a year-long empirical study of the effectiveness of extended online practice of L2 grammar on the overall development of L2 in learners of German. The results of the study suggest that prolonged online grammar practice translated into higher scores on chapter exams. However, no effect was found with regard to written work or oral chats and we concluded that prolonged online grammar practice did not have an effect on the quality of open-ended tasks such as these over the course of a year. Implications for language learning are discussed, exploring possible explanations on the short-term effect of online grammar instruction and the apparent lack of cumulative effect on more open-ended tasks.
References
Arras, U., Eckes T., & Grotjahn, R. (2002).C-Tests im Rahmen des ‘Test Deutsch als Fremdsprache’ (TestDaF): Erste Forschungsergebnisse. In R. Grotjahn (Eds.), Der C-Test. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen. (The c-test: Theoretical foundations and practical applications, pp. 4, 175-209). Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
Bloch, J. (2009). The design of an online concordancing program for teaching about report-ing verbs. Language Learning and Technology: Special Issue on Technology and Learning Grammar, 13(1), 59-78.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 314-348). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Diehl, E., Pistorius, H., & Dietl, A. (2002). Grammatikerwerb im Fremdsprachenunterricht – ein Widerspruch? In W. Börner & K. Vogel (Eds.), Grammatik und Fremd-sprachenerwerb (pp. 143-163). Tübingen: Narr.
Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisi-tion. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Eckerth, J., & Tschirner, E. (2010). Review of recent research (2002–2009) on applied linguistics and language teaching with specific reference to L2 German (part 2). Language Teaching, 43(1), 38-65.
Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of c-tests. Lan-guage Testing, 23, 290. Retrieved from: http://ltj.sagepub.com/content/23/3/290.
Ellis, R. (2002). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curri-uculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. The Asian EFL Journal, 7(3),209-224. Retrieved from http://asian-efl-journal.com/sept_05_re.pdf
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issue in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.
Entwistle, N. (1988). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Faizah, M. (2009). Internet-based grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 34-48.
Fischer, R. (Ed.). (1997). Technology for language learning: Faculty authored Libra courseware. San Marcos, TX: Southwest Texas State University Press.
Fischer, R., & Farris, M. (1995). The instructional basis of Libra. The IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 28, 15-46.
Fischer, R., & Farris, M. (1999). The Libra multimedia authoring environment and CALL multimedia courseware. CALICO, 17(1), 59-82.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2009). Focusing on form: Tools and strategies [Emerging technolo-gies]. Language Learning and Technology: Special Issue on Technology and Learning Grammar, 13(1), 5-12.
Iwashita, N. (2010). Features of oral proficiency in task performance by EFL and JFL learners. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum(pp. 32-47). Retrieved from http://www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2008/paper2383.pdf.
Jafarpur, A. (2002). A comparative study of a c-test and a cloze test. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Der C-Test. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen (The c-test: Theoretical foundations and practical applications, pp. 4, 31-51) Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Katz, B. S., & Blyth, C. (2008). What is grammar? In B. S. Katz & J. Watzinger-Tharp (Eds.), Conceptions of L2 grammar: Theoretical approaches and their applica-tion in the L2 classroom (AAUSC Volume, pp. 2-14). Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Katz, B. S., & Watzinger-Tharp, J. (Eds.) (2008). Conceptions of L2 grammar: Theoretical approaches and their application in the L2 classroom (AAUSC Volume). Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Kessler, G. (2009).Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing.Language Learning and Technology: Special Issue on Technology and Learning Grammar, 13(1), 79-95.
Klein-Braley, C. (1985). A cloze-up on the c-test: A study in the construct validation of authentic tests. Language Testing, 2, 76-104.
Klein-Braley, C. (1997). C-tests in the context of reduced redundancy: An appraisal. Lan-guage Testing, 14(1), 47–84.
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., & White, L. (1993). The role of instruction in second lan-guage acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 143-145.
Lys, F. (1997). From videotape to videodisc to CD-ROM. In Fischer, R. (Ed.), Technology for language learning: Faculty authored Libra courseware (pp. 1-15). San Mar-cos, TX: Southwest Texas State University Press.
Macaro, E., & Masterman, E. (2006) Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? Language Teaching Research 10(3), 297-327.
Mahmood, R. (2008). Another look at the c-test: A validation study with Iranian EFL learn-ers. Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 154-180.
Meerholz-Härle, B., & Tschirner, E. (2001). Processability theory. Eine empirische Unter-suchung. In K. Aguado & C. Riemer (Eds.), Wege und Ziele. Festschrift in honor of Gert Henrici (pp. 155-175). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO, 14, 53-75.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of gram-mar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO, 16(1), 49-62.
Raatz, U., & Klein-Braley, C. (1981). The c-test—A modification of the cloze procedure. In T. Culhane, C. Klein-Braley, & D. K. Stevenson (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing. University of Essex Occasional Papers (pp. 113-148). Col-chester: University of Essex.
Reima, S. A. (2005). The effects of online grammar instruction on low proficiency EFL college students’ achievement. Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 166-190. Retrieved from: http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/site_map_2005.php
Roehr, K. (2007). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 173–199.
Sanz, C., & Leow, R. P. (Eds.). (2011). Implicit and explicit language learning: Con-ditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology: Special Issue on Technology and Learning Grammar, 13(1), 96-120.
Schulz, R. (2002). Hilft es die Regel zu wissen um sie anzuwenden? Das Verhältnis von metalinguistischem Bewusstsein und grammatischer Kompetenz in DaF. Die Unterrichtspraxis/TeachingGerman, 36(1), 5-24.
Siebert-Ott, G. (2000). Die sprachliche Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund. In Landesinstitut für Schule und Weiterbildung und Landeszentrum für Zuwanderer (Hrsg.). Sprachliche Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen aus Migrantenfamilien (pp. 18-34). Boenen: Verlag für Schule und Weiterbildung – Druckverlag Kettler.
VanPatten, B. (2011). Stubborn syntax: How it resists explicit teaching and learning. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 9-21). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 9-21.
Wittig, D. G. (1999). Review of Drehort Neubrandenburg Interaktiv. CALICO Journal, 16(4), 596-605.
