Peripatetic considerations on research challenges in CALL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v30i0.272-279Keywords:
design, evaluation, publishingAbstract
An imaginary walk around the cathedral of Amiens in France. A virtual discussion between two CALLers who have a lot in common, but whose paths did not cross frequently. They discuss a number of topics and issues in CALL research such as academic evaluation, the pressure to publish, research design and changing roles.
References
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th edi-tion). NY: Routledge.
Colpaert, J. (2010). Elicitation of personal goals as design concepts. Innovation in Lan-guage Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 259-274.
Colpaert, J. (2012). The publish and perish syndrome [Editorial]. Computer Assisted Lan-guage Learning, 25(5), 383-391.
Chun, D. (2012). Replication studies in CALL research. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 591-600.
Decoo, W. (2002). Crisis on campus: Confronting academic misconduct . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring stu-dents’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted LanguageLearning, 20, 409-442.
Fischer, R. A. (2012). Diversity in learner usage patterns. In G. Stockwell (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning diversity in research and practice (pp. 14-32). Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Séguéla, J. (1984). Ne dites pas a ma mère que je suis dans la publicité; elle me croit pia-niste dans un bordel. Paris: Flammarion.
Verhaeghe, P. (2012). Identiteit. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.