An Investigation of Alignment in CMC from a Sociocognitive Perspective

Authors

  • Baburhan Uzum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.135-155

Keywords:

Alignment, Interaction, CMC, Conversational Floor

Abstract

Computer technology improves the process of SLA by providing access to an ample amount of input within a communicative context in which participants can engage in synchronous and asynchronous conversations (Payne & Whitney, 2002; Sykes, 2005). This research project aims to investigate the role of alignment in learning a second language within the context of CMC informed by a sociocognitive perspective. Alignment can be operationalized as "the means by which human actors dynamically adapt to--that is, flexibly depend on, integrate with, and construct--the ever changing mind-body-world environments" (Atkinson, Churchill, Nishino, & Okada, 2007, p. 171). The participants (N = 18) are students in an intermediate-level ESL class. The study uses mixed methods and follows an exploratory and inferential approach. The data collection instruments include the transcripts of chat sessions and students' reports from the stimulated recall on their transcripts. This study suggests that participants in a CMC environment display alignment towards each other and to the context of interaction in the domains of fluency and speed, accuracy, lexical and grammatical choices, content agreement, and negotiation of meaning. In the acquisition of a second language, alignment could serve not only pragmatic purposes, enhancing the interaction and lessening ambiguity, but also pose learning opportunities as an outcome of synchronized behavior.

References

Abrams, L., Trunk, D., & White, K. (2007). Visual and auditory priming influences the production of lowfrequency spellings. Reading and Writing, 21, 745-762.

Argyle, M. (1992). Does nonverbal communication cause happiness? In P. Fernando (Ed.), Advances in nonverbal communication: Sociocultural, clinical, esthetic, and literary perspectives (pp. 99-112). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 169-188.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.

Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 409-442.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1991). The contexts of accomodation: Dimensions of applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1997). Accomodation theory. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), A sociolinguistics reader (pp. 232-239). Basingstoke. UK: Macmillan.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.

Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 149-154.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.

Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquistion. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.

McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31-47.

Payne, S., & Whitney, P. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Ouput, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32. Retrieved from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Pellettieri, J. (2000) Negotiatin in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shea, M. (2008). Syntactic priming of future forms in L1 and L2 English. Paper presented at the Michigan Linguistics Society 38th Annual Meeting, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.

Simpson, J. (2005). Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 337-361.

Somekh, B., & Lewin, C. (Eds.). (2007). Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage Publications.

Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 399-431. Retrieved from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Tudini, V. (2007). Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 577-601.

Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta analysis. CALICO Journal, 21, 7-27. Retrieved from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Uzum, B. (2013). An Investigation of Alignment in CMC from a Sociocognitive Perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.135-155

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>