The Role of Organizational Devices in ESL Readers' Construction of Mental Representations of Hypertext Content

Authors

  • Khalid Al-Seghayer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i3.531-559

Keywords:

Hypertext, ESL Reading, ESL Proficiency, Text Structure, Microstructural and Macrostructural Devices

Abstract

The current electronic text format is inherent to the problem of text integration, or, alternatively, cohesion deficit, which greatly affects reading comprehension. The question remains as to whether well structured hypertext would enable L2 readers, particularly ESL readers, to overcome potential difficulties in integrating information and building a unified representation of text content delivered by computer. This study examines the efficacy of embedding microstructural devices (e.g., headings, reviews, and logical connectives statements) and macrostructural devices (a graphical overview map of text content) on the construction and organization of computer hypertext presentations. The study also investigates the interaction between the effect of L2 readers' reading proficiency and the degree of structure in hypertext (structured vs. less structured) on ESL learners' development of coherent mental representations of hypertext content. The participants, 40 ESL students, were introduced to two hypertext reading programs. The first was considered well structured hypertext because it included organizational devices and explicitly showed its underlying hypertext structure. The second was considered less structured because it included no organizational devices and did not indicate the underlying structure of its hypertext. A repeated measures design was used in this study. Forty participants were measured under two conditions: well structured and less structured hypertexts. They were identified as intermediate ESL learners based on their TOEFL scores and were classified as proficient or less proficient readers based on their scores on the reading section of the TOEFL. To assess the efficacy of each type of hypertext, multiple choice and mapping main ideas and details tests were developed and administered to participants after they had read both hypertexts. Results of both tests were analyzed using a paired-samples t-test to compare performance in the two hypertext reading programs and a two-way (proficiency level by hypertext reading program) mixed model ANOVA. The investigation yielded findings showing that well structured hypertext aided ESL readers in developing a more coherent mental representation of the hypertext content, thereby increasing their reading comprehension. The results also indicated that well structured hypertext was more helpful to less proficient readers than it was to more proficient readers. These results offer theoretical, pedagogical, and technological implications for L2 reading instructors and instructional designers.

References

Balajithy, E. (1990). Hypertext, hypermedia, and metacognition: Research and instructional implications. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6 (2), 183-202.

Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27 (3-4), 303-328.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. In J. Rouet, J. Levonen, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 73-107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction, 13 (3), 431-468.

Foltz, P. (1992). Readers’ comprehension and strategies in linear text and hypertext. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Foltz, P. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J. Rouet, J. Levonen, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Geva, E. (1983). Facilitating reading comprehension through flow charting. Reading Research Quarterly, 18 (4), 384-405.

Golding, J., Millis, K., & Hauselt, J. (1995). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on text comprehension. In R. Lorch & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 127-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Greenlee-Moore, M., & Smith, L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children’s reading achievement. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 17 (1), 43-64.

Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles, and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext: A psychological perspective (pp. 55-69). New York: E. Horwood.

Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 3 (2), 129-140.

Hoffman, S. (1998). The effect of a hypertext environment on the reading comprehension of second language learners in an intermediate-level college German course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Alabama, Mobile.

Jonassen, D. (1985). Generative learning vs. mathemagenic control of text processing. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (pp. 9-45). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Kammeyer, K., Ritzer, G., & Yetman, N. (1997). Sociology: Experiencing changing societies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and Microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7 (3), 161-195.

Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85 (5), 363-394.

Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lacroix, N. (1999). Macrostructure construction and organization in the processing of multiple text passages. Instructional Science, 27 (3-4), 221-233.

Landow, G. (1990). Changing texts, changing readers: Hypertext in literary education, criticism, and scholarship. In T. Morgan & B. Henricken (Eds.), Reorientations: Critical theories and pedagogies (pp. 133-161).Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.

Lee, Y. (1989). Effects of learning style and instructional cues and achievement and learning interactivity in a hypermedia instructional system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Leidig, P. (1992). The relationship between cognitive styles and mental maps in hypertext assisted learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Leshin, B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Loman, N., & Mayer, R. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (3), 402-412.

Lorch, F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology, 1 (3), 209-234.

Macromedia. (2002). Flash MX [computer software]. San Francisco: Author.

Martin, J. (1990). Hyperdocuments and how to create them. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mayer, R. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 9 (1), 30-42.

McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14 (1), 63-182.

MOTU. (2001). Digital Performer 3.02 [Computer software]. Cambridge, MA: Mark of the Unicorn.

Nielsen, J. (1990). Hypertext and hypermedia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Reinking, D. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23 (4), 484-498.

Reinking, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a phototypographic world. In C. K. Kinzer, K. Hinchman, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Perspective on literacy research and practice (pp. 448-458). Chicago: National Reading Conference.

Reinking, D., & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (5), 536-552.

Rouet, J. (1990). Interactive text processing by inexperienced (hyper) readers. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, & J. Andre. (Eds.), Hypertext: Concepts, systems and applications (pp. 250-260). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Spyridakis, J., & Standal, T. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effect on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (3), 285-298.

Tang, G. (1992). The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14 (2), 177-195.

Thorn, W. (1995). Points to consider when evaluating interactive multimedia. The Internet TESL Journal, 2 (4). Retrieved January 15, 2003, from http//:www.aitech.ac.jp/~iteslj/Artciles/ThornEvalueConsider.html

van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Winne, H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11 (1), 13-28.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Al-Seghayer, K. (2013). The Role of Organizational Devices in ESL Readers’ Construction of Mental Representations of Hypertext Content. CALICO Journal, 24(3), 531-559. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i3.531-559