The Expanding Role of Technology in Foreign Language Teacher Education Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i2.253-268Keywords:
Teacher Education, Technology Integration in Preservice Programs, Digital Portfolios, Professional Growth PlansAbstract
The advent of the technological era continues to impact foreign language education in numerous ways. Current and future foreign language educators must learn to effectively and meaningfully merge technology with instructional practices and activities. This responsibility necessitates a thorough and realistic understanding of the various functions, uses, strengths, and limitations of technology in education settings. A logical starting place for teachers to gain knowledge and expertise with technology is teacher education programs at the college level. The purposes of this article are (a) to highlight and explain some of the expanding roles and affordances of technology in a collegiate foreign language education program and (b) to encourage continued research and development of instructional technology in teacher education programs. Rather than focusing on one particular class, this article illustrates how technology can be an integral and cohesive programmatic component interwoven throughout teacher candidates' entire academic careers.
References
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (1986). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Author.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (1999). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Yonkers, NY: Author.
Barton, J. (1993). Portfolios in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 2 (1), 41-50.
Britten, J. & Weaver, R. (2004). Digital systems to support the use of professional growth plans in teacher preparation. Journal of Instructional Delivery Systems, 18 (1), 6-9.
Bush, M. D. (1997). Introduction: Technology-enhanced language learning. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. xi-xviii). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76 (8), 597-604.
Educational Resources Information Center. (2003). The educational resource center thesaurus. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov
Fullan, M. (1994). Change forces. New York: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2003). The moral imperative of school leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Glickman, C. (1993). Renewing America’s schools: A guide for school-based action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hall, M. & Elliott, K. (2003). Diffusion of technology into the teaching process: Strategies to encourage faculty to embrace the laptop environment. Journal of Education for Business, 77 (5), 301-307.
Hammadou, J. A. (1996). A blueprint for teacher portfolios: Concerns that need to be addressed when embarking on teacher assessment via portfolios. In J. Harper, M. Lively, & M. Williams (Eds.), The coming of age of the profession: Issues and emerging ideas for the teaching of foreign languages (pp. 291-305). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Hammadou Sullivan, J. A. (2004). Identifying the best foreign language teachers: Teacher standards and professional portfolios. Modern Language Journal, 88 (3), 390402.
Hawisher, G. & Selfe, C. (Eds.) (1997). Literacy, technology, and society: Confronting the issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Luke, C. L. (2005). Preparing future foreign language teachers through digital portfolio initiatives. In P. Boyles & P. Sandrock (Eds.), The year of languages: Challenges, changes, and choices (pp. 41-46). Eau Claire, WI: Crown Prints.
Mullen, L., Britten, J. S., & McFadden, J. (2005). Digital portfolios in teacher education. Indianapolis, IN: Jist Works.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. Woodbridge, VA: Author.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2002). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.
NETS Project (2003). National educational technology standards for teachers—Resources for assessment. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Otero, V., Peressini, D., Anderson-Meymaris, K., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., Rediel, M, Waite, B., & Mears, C. (2005). Integrating technology into teacher education: A critical framework for implementing reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 56 (1), 8-23.
Roblyer, M. (2003). Getting our NETS worth: The role of ISTE’s National Educational Technology Standards. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30 (8), 6-13.
Rilling, S., Dahlman, A., Dodson, S., Boyles, C., & Pazvant, O. (2005). Connecting CALL theory and practice in preservice teacher education and beyond: Processes and products. CALICO Journal, 22 (2), 213-235.
Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (4), 83-90.
Shrum, J. L., & Glisan, E. W. (2005). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Sprague, D., Kopfman, K., & Dorsey, S. (1998). Faculty development in the integration of technology in teacher education courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14 (2), 24-28.
Wright, W. A., Knight, P. T., & Pomerleau, N. (1999). Portfolio people: Teaching and learning dossiers and the future of higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 24 (2), 89-102.
