Contextualized Computer-based L2 Prosody Training
Evaluating the Effects of Discourse Context and Video Input
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i2.175-190Keywords:
Prosody, Training, Discourse, Video, ContextAbstract
Two types of contextualized input in prosody training were investigated for 28 advanced L2 speakers of English (L1 Chinese). Their oral presentations provided training materials. Native-speakers (NSs) of English provided global prosody ratings, and participants completed questionnaires on perceived training effectiveness. Two groups received training input using Anvil, a web-based annotation tool integrating the video of a speech event with visual displays of the pitch contour, and practiced with Real-Time Pitch (RTP) in Computerized Speech Lab including feedback from a NS. Two groups used only RTP to view their pitch contours and practiced with the same feedback. Within these pairs, one group received discourse-level input and the other individual sentences. Each group served as its own control in a time-series design. All had comparable levels of performance prior to training. Results indicated that although all groups improved as a result of training, discourse-level input produced better transfer to novel natural discourse. The presence of video was more helpful with discourse-level input than with individual sentences. Speech samples collected 1 week after training revealed sustained improvement. Questionnaire results support the use of computer-based tools and authentic speech samples. Findings strongly suggest that meaningful contextualized input is valuable in prosody training when the measurement is at the level of extended connected speech typical of natural discourse.
References
Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1992). Using electronic visual feedback to teach suprasegmentals. System, 20, 51-62.
Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994). Interpreting visual feedback on suprasegmentals in computer assisted pronunciation instruction. CALICO Journal, 11, 5-22.
Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Chun, D. M. (1998). Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning & Technology, 2, 61-77. Retrieved January 8, 2004 from http://llt.msu. edu/vol2num1/article4
Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 26, 331-350.
de Bot, K., & Mailfert, K. (1982). The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 71-77.
Flowerdew, J., & Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 435-458.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8, 34-52. Retrieved January 8, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/hardison
Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
Kipp, M. (2001). Anvil – A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 1367-1370). Aalborg, Denmark: Eurospeech.
Leather, J. (1990). Perceptual and productive learning of Chinese lexical tone by Dutch and English speakers. In J. Leather & A. James (Eds.), New Sounds 90 (pp. 72-97). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Molholt, G. (1988). Computer-assisted instruction in pronunciation for Chinese speakers of American English. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 91-111.
Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 481-520.
Pennington, M. C., & Esling, J. H. (1996). Computer-assisted development of spoken language skills. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 153-189). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
Weltens, B., & de Bot, K. (1984). Visual feedback of intonation II: Feedback delay and quality of feedback. Language and Speech, 27, 79-88.
Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1-25.
