Cognitive Principles and CALL Grammar Instruction: A Mind-Centered, Input Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v15i1-3.1-18Keywords:
Cognitive Science, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Foreign Language Acquisition, Grammar, Input, Intake, Learning Theory, Situated CognitionAbstract
Cognitive learning theories increasingly inform the creation and design of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) materials. Recent discussions have explored the potential benefits of underscoring CALL materials with socio-cognitive learning theories such as situated cognition (Salaberry 1996; Renié & Chanier, 1995). However, Reynolds, Sinatra, and Jetton (1996) remind educators that there are principally two types of learning theories, both of which enjoy empirical verification: experience-centered theories, like situated cognition, and mind-centered ones, such as those theories that recognize the importance of providing learners with comprehensible input (e.g., Krashen, 1982). Even if Krashen's theory of comprehensible input is empirically untenable, it is important to keep in mind that no documented cases of successful foreign language acquisition exist without exposure to some sort of comprehensible input (Long, 1990). Thus, CALL materials designers and educators should continue to explore mind-centered theories. Drawing on the latest advances in our understanding of the interaction between internal cognitive processes and foreign language learning--specifically, VanPatten's (1993) Processing Instruction framework--this author outlines principles with which CALL educators can design effective input-oriented tasks targeting grammar instruction. The article concludes with the presentation of a prototype CALL application implementing these principles.References
Andrews, D., Carroll, L., & Bell, H. (1995). The future of selective fidelity in train-ing devices.Educational Technology, 35, 32-36.
Bell, J. M. (1984). The ColorSounds story.ColorSounds Monthly, 1, 1-2.
Bialystock, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second languageproficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investi-gation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79,179-193.
Collentine, J. (In press). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania.
Collentine, J. (1997). Irregular verbs and noticing the Spanish subjunctive. Span-ish Applied Linguistics, 1, 3-23.
Collentine, J., & Collentine, K. (1997). The compatibility of computer-mediatedcommunication solutions with beginning level foreign language curricula.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10, 411-426.
Collins, M., & Berge, Z. (1995). Computer mediated communication and the on-line classroom in higher education. In Z. Berge & M. Collins (Eds.),Computer mediated communication and the on-line classroom (Vol. 2).Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York:Oxford University Press.
Davey D. , Jones, K., & Fox, J. (1995). Multimedia for language learning: Somecourse design issues. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 31-44.
Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOLQuarterly, 32, 39-60.
Garza, T. (1984). On Michael Jackson and minimal pairs. MATSOL Newsletter, 13,8-10.
Garza, T. (1996). The Message is the medium: Using video materials to facilitateforeign language performance.Texas Papers in Foreign Language Edu-cation, 2, 1-18.
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1). Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
Hulstijn, J., & Schmidt, R. (1994). Guest editors’ introduction. AILA Review, 16,5-10.
Krashen, S. (1982).Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Ox-ford: Pergamon Press.
Lehrer, R. (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S.LaJoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197-227).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify: A look at intake.Studies in SecondLanguage Acquisition, 15, 333-356.
Leow, R. (1995). Modality and intake in second language acquisition. Studies inSecond Language Acquisition, 17, 79-90.
Liou, H. C. (1997). Research of on-line help as learner strategies for multimediaCALL evaluation. CALICO Journal, 14, 81-96.
Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain.TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649-666.
Mann, B. (1995). Focusing attention with temporal sound.Journal of Research onComputing in Education, 27, 402-424.
Nicaise, M. (1997). Computer-supported apprenticeships in math and science.TheJournal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 443-465.
Nobuyoshi J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second lan-guage acquisition.” ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Renié, D. & Chanier, T. (1995). Collaboration and computer-assisted acquisitionof a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 3-29.
Reynolds, R., Sinatra, G., & Jetton, T. (1996). Views of knowledge acquisition andrepresentation: A continuum from experience centered to mind centered.Educational Psychologist, 31, 93-104.
Salaberry, M. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogicaltasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 14, 5-36.
Salaberry, M.. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second languageacquisition.Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422-451.
Schwartz, M. (1995). Computers and the language laboratory: Learning from his-tory. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 527-535.
Swaffar, J., Arens, K., and Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tergan, S. (1997). Multiple views, contexts, and symbol systems in learning withhypertext/hypermedia: A critical review of research. Educational Tech-nology, 37, 5-18.
Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach.The Modern Language Journal, 75, 52-63.
Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994.) Attention in cognitive science and second languageacquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-204.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition rich classroom.For-eign Language Annals, 26, 435-450.
VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second languageacquisition: Terms, linguistic features and research methodology. AILAReview, 11, 27-36.
VanPatten, B. (1995). Cognitive aspects of input processing in second languageacquisition. In P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado, & M. van Naerssen (Eds.),Studies in second language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor ofTracy D. Terrell (pp. 170-183). New York: McGraw-Hill.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-244.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Society and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networksand student empowerment. System, 24, 1-14.
Zhoa, Y. (1996). Language learning on the world wide web: Toward a frameworkof network based CALL. CALICO Journal, 14, 37-53
