Providing an Effective and Affective Learning Environment for Spanish Phonetics with a Hypermedia Application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v14i2-4.115-134Keywords:
CALL, computer application, hypermedia, multimedia, phonetics, pronunciation, Spanish phonetics, speechAbstract
Textbooks and audiocassettes have long been the only devices used to support Spanish phonetics learning even though they are not especially effective in (a) assisting some aspects of Spanish phonetics learning, (b) positively influencing affective variables such as self-confidence and motivation, and (c) reducing cognitive loads required by the multiple encoded language used in the learning process. Without appropriate teaching materials, the instructional focus of Spanish phonetics has been restricted to the intellectual comprehension of the subject. As a result, the essential goal of the course--to encourage and to help students develop a deep understanding of speech--has been overlooked. However, the use of certain features of hypermedia computer technology now makes it possible to create an environment that not only addresses the different needs of students but also helps them to develop an introspective awareness of speech. This writer integrated various features of advanced authoring systems to create the prototype of a Spanish phonetics application. The objectives of this project were to remedy the inadequacy of traditional Spanish phonetics methodology and to meet the various needs of the diverse student population taking Spanish phonetics at the university level.References
Catford, J. C. (1988). A Practical Introduction to Phonetics. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
Chun, Dorothy M. (1991). “The State of the Art in Teaching Pronunciation.”Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 179-193.
_____. (1989). “Teaching Tone and Intonation with Microcomputers.” CALICOJournal 7, 21-46.
Dodigovic, Marina (1993). “Interdisciplinary: Computer Assisted Linguistic Re-search and the Development of LSP Courseware.” CALICO Journal 10,5-16.
Esling, John H. (1992). “Speech Technology Systems in Applied Linguistics In-struction.” In Computers in Applied Linguistics: An International Per-spective, edited by Martha C. Pennington and Vance Stevens, 244-272.Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Foley, Richard. (1996). “Developing Multimedia Courseware: Two EFL Applica-tions for Teaching Phonetics.” In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 96, 766.
Hiller, Steven, Edmund Rooney, Rebecca Vaughan, Miriam Eckert, John Laver andMervyn Jack. (1994). “An Automated System for Computer-Aided Pro-nunciation Learning.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 7, 51-63.
Hoogeveen, Martijn (1995). “Towards a New Multimedia Paradigm: is MultimediaAssisted Instruction Really Effective?.” In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA95, 348-353.
Joiner, Elizabeth (1997). “Teaching Listening: How Technology Can Help.” In Tech-nology-Enhanced Language Learning, edited by Michael D. Bush andRobert M. Terry, 77-120. Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Com-pany.
Kenning, M-M. and M. J. Kenning (1990). Computers and Language Learning.Current Theory and Practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.
Ladefoged, Peter (1982). A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt BraceJovanovich.
Lilly, Richard and Laurence Paris (1995). “Articulatory Modelling in ComputerAssisted Phonetic Learning.” In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 95, 396-400.
MacCarthy, Peter. (1978). The Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Molholt, Garry (1988). “Computer-Assisted Instruction in Pronunciation for Chi-nese Speakers of American English.” TESOL Quarterly 22, 91-111.
Najjar, Lawrence J. (1996). “Multimedia Information and Learning.” Journal ofEducational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5, 129-150.
Nicholls, Craig, Susan Merkel, and Marcia Cordts (1996). “The Effect of Com-puter Animation on Students’ Understanding of Microbiology.” Journalof Research on Computing in Education 28, 359-371.
Pennington, Martha C. and John H. Esling (1996). “Computer-Assisted Develop-ment of Spoken Language Skills.” In The Power of CALL, edited by MarthaC. Pennington, 153-189. Houston, Texas: Athelstan.
Rochet, Bernard (1990). “Training Non-Native Speech Contrasts on the Macintosh.”In CALL: Papers and Reports, edited by Mary-Louise Craven, RobertaSinyor and Dana Paramskas, 119-126. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
Salaberry, M. Rafael (1996). “A Theoretical Foundation for the Development ofPedagogical Tasks in Computer Mediated Communication.” CALICOJournal 14, 5-34.
Search, Patricia (1993). “HyperGlyphs: Using Design and Language to DefineHypermedia Navigation.” Journal of Educational Multimedia andHypermedia 2, 369-380.
Spaai, Gerard W. G. and Dik J. Hermes (1993). “A Visual Display for the Teachingof Intonation.” CALICO Journal 10, 19-30.
Stenson, Nancy, Bruce Downing, Jan Smith, and Karin Smith. (1992). “The Effec-tiveness of Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training.” CALICO Jour-nal 9, 5-20.
Szabo, Michael and Brent Poohkay (1995). “Animation, Mathematics Achievementand Attitude toward Computer Assisted Instruction: An Experiment.”Educational Hypermedia and Multimedia 4, 625-630.
Vila, Joaquin and Lon Pearson (1990). “A Computerized Phonetics Instructor:BABEL.” CALICO Journal 7, 3-29.
Wong, Rita (1987a). Teaching Pronunciation: Focus on English Rhythm and Into-nation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
_____ (1987b). “Learner Variables and Prepronunciation Considerations in Teach-ing Pronunciation.” In Current Perspectives on Pronunciation: PracticesAnchored in Theory, edited by Joan Morley, 13-28. Washington, D.C.:TESOL.
