Eliminating the Keyboard

A New Method for Exotic L2 Answer, Entry, Feedback, and Revision

Authors

  • George M. Henry Northern Illinois University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v10i1.53-68

Keywords:

Virtual keyboard, Thai, Asian languages, exotic fonts, Asian fonts, answer judging, answer feedback, edit markup

Abstract

A convenient and user-friendly method for computer-based L2 question presentation, answer entry, feedback, and revision is presented. This method presents a "pool" of text chunks from which the student forms an answer by using a mouse to select and drag the chunks to form the answer. The chunks may range in size from single letters through syllables, infixes, complete words and phrases.

Several methods of feedback may be selected (including edit markup) and the mechanics of answer revision consist simply of rearranging, adding, and deleting chunks. Spelling and typographical errors are eliminated, and consequently edit markup is clear and unambiguous. Questions can vary in depth and difficulty from the equivalent of simple multiple choice to nearly free-form short answer questions.

This method is particularly appropriate for languages with exotic alphabets (such as Thai) since students will not need to learn to type on an unfamiliar and exotic keyboard, but will also be useful for languages which use roman alphabets. In addition, a "virtual keyboard/keypad" is described, which can be used by lesson authors as an aid in typing question text. A prototype Windows-based program incorporating these features is also described.

References

Asher, J. 1982. "The Total Physical Response Approach," Blair, R. W. (Ed.). Innovative Approaches to Language Learning. pp 54-66). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Hart, R. 1989. "Algorithms for the Dynamic Identification of Spelling and Word Order Errors in Student Responses," Technical Report No. LLL-T-15-88. Language Learning Laboratory, University of Illinois: Urbana, IL.

Henry, G. M. 1992. "Answer Markup Algorithms for Southeast Asian Languages," CALICO Journal 9:2, pp. 27-38.

Labrie, G. and L.P.S. Singh. 1991. "Parsing, Error Diagnostics, and Instruction in a French Tutor”, CALICO Journal 9:1, pp. 9-26.

Leibowitz, A. 1985. "User-Friendly Methods of Judging," Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 12:3, pp. 69-70.

Liou, H. 1991. "Development of an English Grammar Checker: A Progress Report," CALICO Journal 9: 1, pp. 57-71.

Murray, J. H.; Morgenstern, D., & Furstenburg, G. 1989. "The Athena Language Learning Project: Design Issues for the Next Generation of Computer-Based Language-Learning Tools," W. F. Smith, (Ed.), Modern Technology in Foreign Language Education. pp 97-118. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Nesbit, J. and K Nakayama. 1990a. "Sequence Comparison Applied to Correction and Markup of Multi-Word Responses," CALICO Journal. 7:4 pp. 27-34.

Nesbit, J. and K. Nakayama. 1990b. "Response Markup With an Edit Distance Algorithm: A Technique for Providing Learners With Feedback on Misspellings," Computers in Education. 14:3 pp. 271-279.

Polson, M. C., & Richardson, J. J. 1988. Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zerwekh, R. 1991. Neurocomputing and Computer-Based Tutoring: Modeling Learner Performance. International joint Conference on Neural Networks. Seattle, WA: IEEE: 2: A895.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Henry, G. M. (2013). Eliminating the Keyboard: A New Method for Exotic L2 Answer, Entry, Feedback, and Revision. CALICO Journal, 10(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v10i1.53-68