Do Language Proficiency and Lecture Comprehension Matter? OpenCourseWare Lectures for Vocabulary Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.663-678Keywords:
OpenCourseWare, OCW, Foreign language learning, Lecture comprehension, Open source lectures, Vocabulary learningAbstract
Open source lectures not only provide knowledge-seekers with convenient ways to obtain knowledge and information, they also serve as potential language learning resources that provide extensive language input and repeated exposure to vocabulary within specific topics or disciplinary. This current study aims to examine the relationship between English proficiency and lecture comprehension on the acquisition of vocabulary through viewing OpenCourseWare (OCW) lectures on the Internet. Data was drawn from a pool of 65 college-level students learning English as a foreign language. Three open source lectures were selected from OCW lectures at MIT and Yale University. The participants’ English proficiency and general comprehension of the three lectures were measured through pre- and post-testing to examine the effects of the lectures on vocabulary acquisition. The results of the study indicate that learners with better English proficiency and better content comprehension acquired more vocabulary from viewing OCW lectures. In addition, overall, learners were satisfied with the learning experience provided by the OCW lectures and considered the OCW lectures to be beneficial for learning English.
References
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, L. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brett, A., Rothlein, L., & Heurley, M. (1996). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories and explanations of target words. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 415–422.
Carlisle, J. F., Fleming, J. E., & Gudbrandsen, B. (2000). Incidental word learning in science classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 184–211.
Cummins, J., & Man, E. (2007). Academic language: What is it and how do we acquire it? In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 797–810). New York: Springer.
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic listening/speaking tasks for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 297–317.
Flowerdew, J. (1994). Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension: An overview. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 7–29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181–193.
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 135–49.
Koolstra, C., & Beentjes, J. (1999). Children’s vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television at home. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 47(1), 51–60.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Kuppens, A. H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 65–85.
Lee, J. F., & Van Patten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2009). Definitions in theology lectures: Implications for vocabulary learning. The Asian ESP Journal, 5(1), 7–22.
Mason, A. (1995). By dint of: Student and lecturer perceptions of lecture comprehension strategies in first-term graduate study. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 199–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science considered, Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady and T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195–224.
Penno, J. F., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew Effect? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 23–33.
Pulido, D. (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53(2), 233–284.
Pulido, D. (2007). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 57(1), 155–199.
Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999). Decalages in talk and gesture: Visual and verbal semiotics of ecology lectures. Linguistics & Education, 10(3), 335–358.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. S. (2009). Opening education. Science, 323(5910), 89–93.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.
Swanborn, M. S. L., & de Glopper, K. (2002). Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language Learning, 52(1), 95–117.
Tekmen, E., & Daloglu, A. (2006). An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(3), 220–243.
UNESCO. (2005). Open content for higher education. Retrieved April 11, 2011, from http://www.unesco.org/iiep/virtualuniversity/media/forum/oer_forum_session_2_note.pdf
Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56–89.
Vidal, K. (2010). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219–258.
Wiley, D. (2006). The current state of open educational resources. Retrieved August 8, 2012, from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247
