Conversation analysis in Computer-assisted Language Learning

Authors

  • Marta González-Lloret University of Hawaii, Manoa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.27568

Keywords:

Conversation Analysis

Abstract

The use of Conversation Analysis (CA) in the study of technology-mediated interactions is a recent methodological addition to qualitative research in the field of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL). The expansion of CA in Second Language Acquisition research, coupled with the need of qualitative techniques to explore how people interact in technology-mediated environments, has stimulated a small but growing body of research. This article reviews CALL research that employed a CA approach to the collection, microanalysis, and understanding of the data in a variety of technology-mediated fields (text, audio and video SCMC, email, forums and bulletin boards, social networks, and games), with participants from different contexts and languages, interacting in an L2 either among themselves or with native/more expert speakers of the language. Most research up to now has been descriptive in nature, illustrating the sequential organization of interaction, interactional and linguistic resources employed by the participants, and affordances and challenges of the media to promote language learning. In addition, a few studies have directly explored “learning” through the microanalysis of longitudinal data for any changes in the learners’ linguistic and interactional patterns of engagement. The review of studies is followed by those challenges that affect the implementation of CA in CALL research and a vision of the future of CA for CALL in the larger field of Applied Linguistics.

Author Biography

  • Marta González-Lloret, University of Hawaii, Manoa
    Marta González-Lloret is an Associate Professor at the University of Hawai`i Manoa, USA. Her main areas of interest are the intersections of technology and TBLT (Task-based Language Teaching) and technology and L2 pragmatics; Conversation Analysis of multilingual computer-mediated interaction; teacher training; and assessment. She has been chair of the CALICO CMC special interest group and she is now serving as board member for the CALICO organization.

References

Antaki, C. (Ed.). (2011). Applied Conversation Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arminen, I., & Leinonen, M. (2006). Mobile phone call openings: tailoring answers to personalized summonses. Discourse Studies, 8 (3), 339–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061791

Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy: Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (10), 1905–1923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.016

Baym, N. (2010). Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Beauvois M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated-communication in the foreign language classroom, Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (2), 198–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.2.198

Beisswenger, M. (2008). Situated chat analysis as a window to the user’s perspective: Aspects of temporal and sequential organization. Language @ Internet, 5 Retrieved form http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1532

Brandt, A., & Jenks, C. (2013). Computer-Mediated Spoken Interaction: Aspects of Trouble in Multi-Party Chat Rooms. Language @ Internet, 10. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2013/Brandt/

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1 (1), 29–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873

Burch, A. R. (2014). Pursuing Information: A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies: Pursuing information. Language Learning, 64 (3), 651–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12064

Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(94)90037-x

Collister, L. B. (2008) Virtual Discourse Structure: An Analysis of Conversation in World of Warcraft. Master's Thesis, University of Pittsburgh.

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd edn). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002

Danet, B. (1997). Books, letters, documents: The changing aesthetics of texts in late print culture. Journal of Material Culture, 2 (1), 5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135918359700200101

Danet, B., Ruedenberg, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1996). ‘Hmmm … where’s that smoke coming from?” Writing, play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2 (4). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/danet.html

Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye, gaze and the German repair initiator bitte? Language in Society, 25 (4), 587–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020820

Egbert, M., Niebecker, L., & Rezzara, S. (2004). Inside first and second language speakers’ trouble in understanding. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds), Second Language Conversation, 178–200. London; New York: Continuum.

Fischer, K., & Tebrink, T. (2003). Video conferencing in a transregional research cooperation: Turn-taking in a new medium. In J. Döring, H. W. Schmidtz, & O. Schulte (Eds), Connecting Perspectives. Videokonferenz: Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung und Anwendung, 89–104. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.

Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The Eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (4), 337–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2

Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (2004). Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum.

Gibson, W. (2009a). Intercultural communication online: Conversation analysis and the investigation of asynchronous written discourse. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10 (1), 1–18.

Gibson, W. (2009b). Negotiating textual talk: Conversation analysis, pedagogy and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse. British Educational Research Journal, 35 (5), 705–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920802688754

Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Negotiation of face in web chats. Mutilingua, 25 (3), 293–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.017

Gonzales, A. M. (2012). Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in Native Speaker/Nonnative Speaker Participatory Online Environments (Order No. 3526888). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1081472683). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1081472683?accountid=27140

Gonzales, A. M. (2013). Development of politeness strategies in participatory online environments. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching, 101–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.36.06gon

González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated Learning of L2 Pragmatics. In E. A. Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing, 114–132. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

González-Lloret, M. (2009). CA for computer-mediated interaction in the Spanish L2 classroom. In H. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives, 281–316. Honolulu, HI: NFLRC and University of Hawaii Press.

González-Lloret, M. (2011). Conversation analysis of computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 28 (2), 308–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.308-325

Hauser, E. (2005). Coding ‘corrective recasts’: The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems. Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 293–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami010

Hauser, E. (2013). Stability and change in one adult’s Second Language English negation: Stability and change. Language Learning, 63 (3), 463–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12012

He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 568–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x

Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 Literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27 (3), 377–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami052

Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Hellerman, Thorne, Lester & Jones (in preparation). Walking and talking as a group: Interactional practices for playing an AR game with a mobile digital device.

Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (5). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1999.772674

Hirst, G. (1991). Does conversation analysis have a role in computational linguistics? Review of Luff, P, Gilbert, N & Frohlich, D. (1990) Computers and Conversations. Computational Linguistics, 17 (2), 211–227.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jenks, C. (2009a). When is it appropriate to talk? Managing overlapping talk in multi-participant voice-based chat rooms. CALL, 22 (1), 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613781

Jenks, C. J. (2009b). Getting acquainted in Skypecasts: Aspects of social organization in online chat rooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 26–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00211.x

Jenks, C. J. (2010). Adaptation in online voice-based chat rooms: implications for language learning in Applied Linguistics. In Seedhouse, P., Walsh, S. and Jenks, C. (Eds). Conceptualising Learning in Applied Linguistics, 147–162, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jenks, C. J., & Brandt, A. (2013). Managing mutual orientation in the absence of physical copresence: Multiparty voice-based chat room interaction. Discourse Processes, 50 (4), 227–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.777561

Jenks, C., & Firth, A. (2013). Interaction in synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, T. Virtanen, & W. Bublitz (Eds), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, 209–234. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German Conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 551–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x

Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation Analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas

Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2007). Handling sequentially inapposite responses. In Z. Wei, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds), Language learning and teaching as social interaction, 22–41. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014

Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13 (3), 143–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143

Kitade, K. (2005). Interactional features of asynchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning: From cognitive and sociocultural perspectives (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu.

Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In K. Mortensen & J. Wagner (Eds), Conversation Analysis. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1038–1043. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lazaraton, A. (2014). Aaaaack! The active voice was used! Language play, technology, and repair in the Daily Kos weblog. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 102–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.002

Licoppe, C. (2009). Recognizing mutual ‘proximity’ at a distance: Weaving together mobility, sociality and technology. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (10), 1924–1937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.017

Liddicoat, A. (2007). An introduction to Conversation Analysis. London ; New York, NY: Continuum.

Luff, P., Frohlich, D., & Gilbert, N. G. (2014). Computers and Conversation. Burlington: Elsevier Science.

Marcoccia, M., Atifi, H., & Gauducheau, N. (2008). Text-centered versus multimodal analysis of instant messaging conversation. Language @ Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1621.

Markee, N. (2000). Conversation Analysis. New York: Routledge.

Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics. 29 (3), 404–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052

Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal. 88 (4), 491–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x

Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in Second Language Acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification: Planning and task performance in SLA. Language Learning, 63 (4), 629–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12019

Markee, N., & Stansell, J. (2007). Using electronic publishing as a resource for increasing empirical and interpretive accountability in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070025

Markman, K. (2005). To send or not to send: Turn construction in computer-mediated chat. Texas Linguistic Forum, 48, 115–124.

Markman, K. M. (2009). ‘So what shall we talk about’: Openings and closings in chat-based virtual meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46 (1), 150–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943608325751

Markman, K. (2010). Learning to work virtually: Conversational repair as a resource for norm development in computer-mediated team meetings. In J. Park & E. G. Abels (Eds), Interpersonal relations and social patterns in communication technologies: Discourse norms, language structures and cultural variables, 220–235. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-827-2.ch012

Meredith, J. & Stokoe, E. (2014), Repair: Comparing Facebook 'chat' with spoken interaction, Discourse & Communication, 8 (2), 181–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815

Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 501–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x

Moore, R. J., Ducheneaut, N. & Nickell, E. (2006). Doing virtually nothing: Awareness and accountability in massively multiplayer online worlds. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16 (3), 265–303. Retrieved from http://www.ducheneaut.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/DoingVirtuallyNothing.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9021-4

Morán, L. (2008). La organización de los turnos de habla en chats de plataformas de e-learning. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 7, 18–44.

Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 536–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x

Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of interculturality through embodied completion: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml014

Murray, D. (1989). When the medium determines the truth: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with Language, 319–337. The Hague: Mouton.

Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversational analysis approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (1), 75–87. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/

Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds), Second Language Conversation, 221–245. London: Continuum.

Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: on language, learning and documenting learning in conversation analytic SLA research. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, and C. Jenks (Eds) Conceptualising Learning in Applied Linguistics, 105–126, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Piirainen–Marsh, A. (2011). Enacting interactional competence in gaming activities: Coproducing talk with virtual others. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. P. Doehler (Eds), L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 19–44. Bristol; Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.

Piirainen–Marsh, A. (2012). Organising participation in video-gaming activities. In R. Ayass & C. Gerhardt (Eds), The appropriation of media in everyday life. What people do with media, 197–230. Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.224.09pii

Piirainen–Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. Modern Language Journal, 93 (2), 153–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00853.x

Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2014). Asymmetries of knowledge and epistemic change in social gaming interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (4), 1022–1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/modl.12153

Pojanapunya, P., & Jaroenkitboworn, K. (2011). How to say ‘Good-bye’ in Second Life. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (14), 3591–3602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.010

Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action and sense-making practices. In T. v. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, 1–37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rintel, S., Mulholland, J., & Pittam, J. (2001). First things first: Internet relay chat openings. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6 (3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/rintel.html http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00125.x

Rintel, E. S., Pittam, J., & Mulholland, J. (2003). Time will tell: Ambiguous non-responses on internet relay chat, CIOS, 13 (1). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/getfile/rintel_v13n1

Sacks, H. E., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010

Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Third Turn Repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, 31–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.128.05sch

Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica. 8 (4), 289–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Schegloff, E.A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S. and Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation Analysis and Applied Linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 22, 3–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0267190502000016

Schönfeldt, J., & Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A Conversation Analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36 (3), 241–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02

Schulze, M., & Smith, B. (2015). In theory – We could be better. CALICO Journal, 32 (1), i–vi.

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching. 38(4), 165–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805003010

Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation Analytic Research into language teaching and learning. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.) The handbook of research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2, 345–363. London: Routledge.

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds). (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 38–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177

Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12 (1), 85–103. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/smith.pdf

Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics, Vol. 11, 79–97. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6

Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16 (3), 53–81.

Stommel, W. (2008). Conversation Analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language @ Internet, 5 Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1537

Suzuki, S. (2013). Private turns: A student’s off-screen behaviours during synchronous online Japanese instruction. CALICO Journal, 30 (3), 371–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.371-392

Tanskanen, S.-K., & Karhukorpi, J. (2008). Concessive Repair and negotiation of affiliation in e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (9), 1587–1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.018

ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A practical guide (2nd edn). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Tercedor Cabrero, M. (2013). Developing interactional competence through video-based computer-mediated conversations: Beginning learners of Spanish (PhD dissertation). University of Iowa. Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/4918/

Thorne, S. L. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: Heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926719

Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 38–67. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html.

Thorne, S. L., & Smith, B. (2011). Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning. CALICO Journal, 28 (2), 268–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.268-277

Tsai, M.-H., & Kinginger, C. (2014). Giving and receiving advice in computer-mediated peer response activities. CALICO Journal, 32 (1), 82–112.

Tudini, V. (2002). The role of online chatting in the development of competence in oral interaction. Proceedings of the Innovations in Italian Workshop, 40–57. Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www.gu.edu.au/centre/italian/pdf/4_tudini.pdf.

Tudini, V. (2010). Online second language Acquisition. Conversation Analysis of online chat. London, New York: Continuum.

Tudini, V. (2013). Form-focused social repertoires in an online language learning partnership. Journal of Pragmatics, 50 (1), 187–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.005

Tudini, V. (2014). Conversation Analysis of computer-mediated interactions. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1–7. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1456

Vandergriff, I. (2013a). ‘My major is English, believe it or not:)’ — Participant Orientations in Nonnative/Native Text Chat. CALICO Journal, 30 (3), 393–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.393-409

Vandergriff, I. (2013b). Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008

Vandergriff, I. (2014). A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use in nonnative / native speaker text chat. Language @ Internet, 11. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2014/vandergriff

Vayreda, A., & Nuñez, F. (2010). The role of metaphors in the interpersonal discourse of online forums. In J. Park (Ed.), Interpersonal relations and social patterns in communication technologies: Discourse norms, language structures and cultural variables. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-827-2.ch008

Wagner, J. (1996). Foreign language acquisition through interaction – A critical review of research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (2), 215–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00013-6

Wooffit, R. (1990). An introduction to Conversation Analysis. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, & D. Frohlich (Eds), Computers and Conversation, 7–38. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

Wong, J. (2005). Sidestepping Grammar. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds), Applying Conversation Analysis, 159–173. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Pub. Co. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213

Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2011). Pursuing a question: reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction. Journal of Pragmatics. 43, 475–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.022

Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). ‘Put your fingers in there’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16 (2), 163–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515359

Downloads

Published

2015-09-10

Issue

Section

Review article

How to Cite

González-Lloret, M. (2015). Conversation analysis in Computer-assisted Language Learning. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 569-594. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.27568