Criterion Online Writing Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.27801Keywords:
academic writing evaluation, second language writing, corrective feedbackReferences
Cotos, E., & Huffman, S. (2011). Learner fit in scaling up automated writing evaluation. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3 (3), 77–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2013070105
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Haupt, J., & Bikowski, D. (2014). English language learners’ perceptions of the usefulness of types of form-focused written feedback. Writing & Pedagogy, 6 (2), 283–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/wap.v6i2.283
Healey, D., Hanson-Smith, E., Hubbard, P., Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Kessler, G., & Ware, P. (2011). TESOL technology standards: Description, implementation, integration. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. M. Browne (Eds), New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms, 45–67. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Li, Z., Link, S., Ma, H., Yang, H., & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). The role of automated writing evaluation holistic scores in the ESL classroom. System, 44 (1), 66–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.02.007
Ware, P. (2011). Computer-generated feedback on student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (4), 769–774. http://dx.doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.272525
