Application of Immersive Virtual Reality to Pragmatics Data Collection Methods
Insights from Interviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.41136Keywords:
virtual reality, pragmatics, closed role-playAbstract
This exploratory study investigated the usability of immersive virtual reality (VR) as a way of creating a role-play task to examine pragmatic competence, specifically the ability to produce the speech act of request. The study created a closed role-play task in two versions. One was a standard computer-based version in which participants read a written scenario displayed on the screen and produced the target speech act for the computer. The other one was a VR version in which participants put on a VR headset and produced the target speech act for the interlocutor in the virtual space. Five native and five non-native speakers of English completed both versions and participated in a follow-up interview. The purpose of the interview was to examine similarities and differences in participants' perceptions of the two role-play tasks in four areas: (1) thought processes (what they were thinking during the task), (2) recall (what they remembered about the task), (3) difficulty (what made the task difficult), and (4) enjoyment (whether the task was fun). Results revealed that the participants attended to various audio-visual cues in the VR scene and used them to guide their actions. The VR version also evoked greater emotional reactions from the participants.
References
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt268xx
Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technology and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12327
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692388
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Halenko, N. (2013). Using computer animation to assess and improve spoken language skills. In Conference proceedings: ICT for language learning (p. 286). Florence, Italy: Libreria Universitaria.
Hui-Chun, Y., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). An exploratory study into interlanguage pragmatics of requests: A game of persuasion. ETS research report, RR09-13. New Jersey: ETS. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2009.tb02170.x
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Wojdynski, T. (2018). Students' attitudes toward high-immersion virtual reality assisted language learning. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters (pp. 124-129). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.824
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009955
Lan, Y. J. (2020). Immersion, interaction, and experience-oriented learning: Bringing virtual reality into FL learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2020.03.001
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, H. C.-S., Yu, S.-J., Sun, J. C.-Y., & Jong, Y. M.-S. (2019). Engaging university students in a library guide through wearable spherical video-based virtual reality: Effects on situational interest and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi. org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1624579
Moustafa, F., & Steed, A. (2018). A longitudinal study of small group interaction in social virtual reality. VRST 18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505.3281527
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2019). Data collection methods in L2 pragmatics research: An overview. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 195-211). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-13
Ren, W. (2014). A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners' cognitive processes during study abroad. Applied Linguistics, 35, 575-594. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt019
Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality: Exploring the brave new technologies. Avon, MA: Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group.
Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1993). Three views of virtual reality: Nonimmersive virtual reality. Computer, 26(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.192002
Rockey, C., Tiegs, J., & Fernández, F. (2020). Mobile application use in technology-enhanced DCTs. CALICO, 37, 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.38773
RunRev, Ltd. (2013). LiveCode [Software Programming]. Livecode.com.
Scanlon, M., & Castaneda, L. (2018). "I know what it feels like to be lonely": Presence & engagement in the 360 video Henry. Retrieved March 20, 2020 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XgEOMTD8Q6nL7CK0K7frD7WWve9lis1z/view
Schultze, U., & Leahy, M. (2009). The avatar-self relationship: Enacting presence in second life. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 12. Retrieved March 20, 2020 from https://aisel.aisnet
Sykes, J. M., & Dubreil, S. (2019). Pragmatics learning in digital games and virtual environments. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 387-399). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-25
Sykes, J. M., & Reinhardt, J. (2012). Language at play: Digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml051
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Taguchi, N. (2018). Data collection in developmental L2 pragmatics research: Discourse completion test, role play, and naturalistic recording. In A. Gudmestad & A. Edmonds (eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 7-32). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.51.02tag
Taguchi, N. (Ed.) (2019) The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91-111. https:// doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. New York, NY: Longman.
VERBI GmbH, Ltd.(2020). MAXQDA [Software Programming]. Maxqda.com
Vilar-Beltrán, E., & Melchor-Couto, S. (2013). Refusing in second life. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication, 25, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209717_004
Youn, S. J., & Bogorevich, V. (2019). Assessment in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 308-321). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-20
Xie, Y., Ryder, L., & Chen, Y. (2019). Using interactive virtual reality tools in an advanced Chinese language class: A case study. TechTrends, 63, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00389-z
