Communication & Medicine, Vol 9, No 3 (2012)

Damning with faint praise: How homoeopaths talk about conventional medicine with their patients

John Chatwin


Homoeopathy is one of the most widely used forms of complementary medicine in the West. However, its methods and philosophical underpinnings are basically polarized in relation to those of conventional medicine. Many homoeopathic patients choose to continue using conventional medicine while they receive homoeopathy, but from a homoeopathic perspective, these treatments are often regarded as undesirable or even damaging. This article will utilize the principles of conversation analysis (CA) to explore points in homoeopathic consultations where practitioners address their patients’ use of conventional medications. It will be suggested that approaches which display a degree of incorporation are preferred to those which imply categorical rejection. By not emphasizing the underlying tensions between conventional and homoeopathic paradigms, and displaying an adaptive and inclusive approach, homoeopathy essentially sets itself up as a parallel (i.e. equal) system, rather than one that is purely in opposition to the dominant medical model.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/cam.v9i3.191


Adams, J., Lui, C., Sibbritt, D., Broom, A., Wardle, J, Homer, C. and Beck, S. (2009) Women’s use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: A critical review of the literature. Birth 36 (3): 237–245.
Barry, C. A. (2005) The role of evidence in alternative medicine: Contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches. Social Science and Medicine 62 (11): 2646–2657.
Baum, M. and Ernst, E. (2009) Should we maintain an open mind about homeopathy? The American Journal of Medicine 122 (11): 973–974.
Bishop, F. L., Prescott, P., Koon Chan, Y., Saville, J.,Von Elm, E. and Lewith, G. T. (2010) Prevalence of complementary medicine use in pediatric cancer: A systematic review. Pediatrics 125 (4): 125–768.
Brien, S., Lachance, L., Prescott, P., McDermott, C. and Lewith, G. (2011) Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology 50 (6): 1070–1082.
Chatwin, J. (2008) Pre-empting ‘trouble’ in the homoeopathic consultation. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 244–256.
Chatwin, J. (2009) Activity transitions in the homoeopathic therapeutic encounter. Sociological Review 57 (1): 163–185.
Chatwin, J. and Collins, S. (2002) Communication in the homoeopathic consultation. The Homoeopath 84 (winter): 24–27.
Collins, S., Drew, P., Watt, I. and Entwistle, V. (2005). ‘Unilateral’ and ‘bilateral’ practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. Social Science and Medicine 61: 2611–2627.
Clark-Grill, M. (2010) When listening to the people: Lessons from complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1): 71–81.
DeSylvia, D., Stuber, M., Fung, C. C., Bazargan-Hejazi, S. and Cooper, E. (2011) The knowledge, attitudes and usage of complementary and alternative medicine of medical students. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2011 (2011) Article ID 728902 5 pages.
Drew, P., Chatwin, J. and Collins, S. (2001) Conversation analysis: A method for research into interactions between patients and healthcare professionals. Health Expectations 4 (1): 58–70.
Eastwood, H. (2000) Why are Australian GP's using alternative medicine? Postmodernisation, consumerism and the shift towards holistic health. Journal of Sociology 36: 133–135.
Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Cindy, F., Norlock, F., Calkins, D. R. and Delbanco, T. L. (1993) Unconventional medicine in the United States – prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. The New England Journal of Medicine 328 (4): 246–252.
Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S., Gilhooly, K., Bugge, C., Haites, N. and Walker, A. (2004) Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision making: Insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counselling 55: 105–113.
Ernst, E. (2002) A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54 (6): 577–582.
Ernst, E. (2007) Exploring homoeopathy (2007). Preventative Medicine 45 (4): 280–281.
Ernst, E . (2008) The truth about homeopathy. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 65 (2): 163–164.
Eyles, C., Leydon, G. M., Lewith, G. T. and Brien, S. (2011) A grounded theory study of homeopathic practitioners’ perceptions and experiences of the homeopathic consultation. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Vol 2011 (2011). Article ID 957506. Epub 2010 September 30.
Frank, R. (2002) Homoeopath and patient – a dyad of harmony? Social Science and Medicine 55 (2): 1285–1296.
Goldacre, B. (2007) Benefits and risks of homoeopathy. The Lancet 370 (9600): 1672–1673.
Heath, C. (1992) The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. (2006) Problems and prospects in the study of physician – patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1): 351–374.
Heritage, J. and Sorjonen, M. L. (1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, J. and Stivers, T. (1999) Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science and Medicine 49 (11): 1501–1517.
Kaplan, B. (2001) The Homoeopathic Conversation: The Art of Taking the Case. London: Natural Medicine Press.
Kayne, B. S. (ed.) (2009) Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2nd edn. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
Lambert, H., Gordon, E. J. and Bogdan-Lovis, E. A. (2005) Gift horse or trojan horse? Social science perspectives on evidence-based health care. Social Science & Medicine 62 (11): 2613–2620.
McCarthy, M. (2005) Critics slam draft WHO report on homoeopathy. The Lancet 366 (9487): 705–706.
Mcgregor, K. K. and Peay, E. R. (1996) The choice of alternative therapy for health care: Testing some propositions. Social Science and Medicine 43 (9): 1317–1327.
Molassiotis, A., Fernadez-Ortega, P., Pud, D., Ozden, G., Scott, J. A., Panteli, V., Margulies, A., Browall, A., Magri, M., Selvekerova, S., Madsen, E., Milovics, L., Bruyns, I., Gudmundsdottir, G., Hummerston, S., Ahmad, A. M.-A., Platin, N., Kearney, N. and Patiraki, E. (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: A European survey. Annals of Oncology 16 (4): 655–663.
Novack, D. H. (1987) Therapeutic aspects of the clinical encounter. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2 (Sept/Oct): 346–335.
Plug, L. and Reuber, M. (2007) Analysing patients’ talk in the differential diagnosis of seizure disorders: A case comparison. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2 (8): 200–218.
Randerson, J. (2007) Doctors renew drive to ban NHS homeopathy. The Guardian, 23rd May.
Reilly, D. (1999) CAM in Europe: Reflections and Trends. Article prepared for 2nd International Joint Symposium, Seoul, Korea.
Reilly, D. (2001) Enhancing human healing. British Medical Journal 322 (20th January): 120–121.
Ruusuvuori, J. (2005a) ‘Empathy’ and ‘sympathy’ in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in Finnish homoeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 204–222.
Ruusuvuori, J. (2005b) Comparing homoeopathic and general practice consultations: The case of problem presentation. Communication and Medicine 2: 123–136.
Ruusuvuori, J. and Lindfors, P. (2008) Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2415–2434.
Samarasekera, U. (2007) Pressure grows against homoeopathy in the UK. The Lancet 370 (9600): 1677–1678.
House of Commons (2010) House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Fourth Report. Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy. London: Science and Technology Committee Publications.
Smith, K. (2011) Against homoeopathy – a utilitarian perspective. Bioethics 26 (8): 398–409.
Tovey, P., Broom, A. F., Chatwin, J., Ahmad, S. and Hafeez, M. (2005) Use of traditional, complementary and allopathic medicines in Pakistan by cancer patients. Rural and Remote Health 5 (4): 447.
Tovey, P., Chatwin, J. and Broom, A. (2007) Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Cancer Care: An International Analysis of Grassroots Integration. London: Routledge.
Van Haselen, R., Reiber, U., Nickel, I., Jakob, A. and Fisher, P. A. G. (2004) Providing complementary and alternative medicine in primary care: The primary care workers’ perspective. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 12 (4): 6–16.
Weatherly-Jones, E., Thompson, E. A. and Thomas, K. J. (2004) The placebo-controlled trial as a test of complementary and alternative medicine: Observations from research experience of individualised homeopathic treatment. Homoeopathy 93 (4): 186–189.
Whyte, J. (2006) Homoeopathy: Voodoo on the NHS. The Times, 15th July.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: