The Problems of Conscience and Hermeneutics

A Few Contemporary Approaches

Authors

  • Ayesha S Chaudhry New York University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cisv2i2.157

Keywords:

Nushuz, Women, Beating, Q. 4, 34, Gender, Gender Egalitarianism, Qur'anic Interpretation, Qur'an, Tradition, Wadud, Barlas, Esack, Moosa, Kecia Ali, Mubarak, Badawi, Shafaat, Justice

Abstract

This paper surveys the contemporary approaches to the problems of conscience raised by the verse, exploring modes of resolving the issues that arise when believing Muslims approach the verse and find its apparent meaning to violate their pre-existing notions of justice, notions which are partly informed the by the Qur'anic text itself. It finds that the prescription of 'hitting' one's wife, as the last of three mitigating directives when dealing with a woman who embodies the quality of "nushuz", creates a moment of interruption in the relationship between the believer and text. Contemporary scholars engage both text and historical precedent in the present context when (re)interpreting Qur'an 4:34 and the relative weight given to text and precedent determines the conclusions of individual arguments.

References

Ali, Kecia. Sexual Ethics and Islam. Oxford: Oneworld, 2006.

Ali, Kecia. “‘A Beautiful Example’: The Prophet Muhammad as a Model for Muslim Husbands.” Islamic Studies 43, no. 2 (2004): 273–91.

Badawi, Jamal A. Gender Equity in Islam: Basic Principles. 1995. www.iad.org/pdf/gei.pdf.

Barlas, Asma. “Believing Women” in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.

Esack, Farid. “What Do Men Owe to Women: Islam and Gender Justice: Beyond Simplistic Apologia,” http://uk.geocities.com/faridesack/fewhatdomenowe.html.

Esack, Farid. “Islam and Gender Justice: Beyond Simplistic Aplogia.” In What Men Owe to Women: Men’s Voices from World Religions, ed. J. C. Raines and D. C. Maguire, 187–210. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.

El Fadl, Khaled Abou. Conference of the Books: The Search for Beauty in Islam. New York: University Press of America, 2001.

El Fadl, Khaled Abou. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld, 2001.

Hassan, Riffat. “An Islamic Perspective.” In Sexuality: A Reader, ed. Karen Lebacqz. Cleveland: Pilgrim, 1999.

Lander, Mark. “Germany Cites Koran in Rejecting Divorce.” The New York Times, March 22, 2007.

MacFarquhar, Neil. “New Translation Prompts Debate on Islamic Verse.” The New York Times, March 25, 2007.

Moosa, Ebrahim. “The Debts and Burden of Critical Islam.” In Progressive Muslims: On Gender, Justice and Pluralism, ed. Omid Safi, 111–27. Oxford: Oneworld, 2003.

Mubarak, Hadia. “Breaking the Interpretive Monopoly: A Re-Examination of Verse 4:34.” Hawwa 2, no. 3 (2005): 261–89.

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Shafaat, Ahmed. “A Commentary on the Qur’an 4:34.” http://www.themodernreligion.com/women/dv–4–34-shafaat.html.

Shaikh, Sa’diyya. “Exegetical Violence: Nushuz in Qur’anic Gender Ideology.” Journal for Islamic Studies 17 (1997): 49–73.

Shaikh, Sa’diyya. “A Tafsir of Praxis: Gender, Marital Violence, and Resistance in a South African Muslim Community.” In Violence Against Women: Roots and Cures in World Religions, ed. Sa’diyyah Shaikh and Dan Maguire. Ohio: Pilgrim, forthcoming.

Wadud, Amina. Qur’an and Woman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Wadud, Amina. Inside the Gender Jihad: Women’s Reform in Islam. Oxford: Oneworld, 2006.

Wehr, Hans. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. Beirut: Librarire du Liban, 1980.

Published

2008-04-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chaudhry, A. S. (2008). The Problems of Conscience and Hermeneutics: A Few Contemporary Approaches. Comparative Islamic Studies, 2(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1558/cisv2i2.157