Digital technology and methodological adaption

text on video as a resource for analytical reflexivity

Authors

  • Barry Saferstein California State University San Marcos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i2.197

Keywords:

discourse analysis, qualitative methods, pointing, reflexivity, transcripts, video data

Abstract

As digital video technologies develop for recording, viewing, and organising data, it is useful to examine the relationship between technologies and analytical procedures. Accessible technology now enables researchers to mark, annotate, and compare digital video recordings. Such features encourage and facilitate a more comprehensive examination of the non-verbal components of interaction than text-centered approaches. Digital video editing software offers researchers the potential to modify analytical procedures in ways that enhance the use of recorded data and expand analytical concepts for the study of interaction. Video recordings of biology students, interacting as they work on a genetics assignment, are discussed in regard to the features of video editing software that enable constant and immediate access, in one computer window, to recorded data, transcript extracts, and analytical comments. Particular attention is paid to the use of timelines, video markers, and the placement of transcripts of students’ utterances and analysts’ comments on the video images. Such features supported analytical procedures that sustained an emphasis on the primary recorded data. This led to increased reflexivity among primary data, analytical categories, and transcripts, with the result of increased attention to the importance of pointing in the task-related discourse and the students’ understandings of genetics concepts.

Author Biography

  • Barry Saferstein, California State University San Marcos

    Professor Communication Department Director, Discourse and Media Lab California State University San Marcos San Marcos, CA 92096 USA

References

Banks, M. (1998) Visual anthropology: image, object, and interpretation. In J. Prosser (ed.) Image Based Research 9–23. London: Falmer Press.

Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E. and Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2001) Constructing networks of action–relevant episodes: an in situ research methodology. Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(1/2): 63–113.

Bedny, G. Z. and Karwowski, W. (2003) A systemic–structural activity approach to the design of human–computer interaction tasks. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction 16(2): 235–60.

Church, R. B. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986) The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition 23: 43–71.

Cicourel, A. V. (1964) Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.

Cicourel, A. V. (1974) Cognitive Sociology: language and meaning in social interaction. New York: Free Press.

Cicourel, A. V. (1985) Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 159–85.

Coffey, A., Atkinson, P. and Holbrook, B. (1996) Qualitative data analysis: technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online 1(1) http://www.socresonline.org. uk/socresonline/1/1/4.html

Coleman, E. (1998) Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences 7: 387–427.

Corsaro, W. A. (1981) Communicative processes in studies of social organization: Sociological approaches to discourse analysis. Text 1(1): 5–63.

Crowder, E. (1996) Gestures at work in sense–making science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences 5: 173–208.

Crowder, E. and Newman, D. (1993) Telling what they know: the role of gesture and language in children’s science explanations. Pragmatics and Cognition 1: 341–76.

Denora, T. (1995) Beethoven and the Social Construction of Genius. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dicks, B. and Mason, B. (1998) Hypermedia and ethnography: reflections on the construction of a research approach. Sociological Research Online 3(3) http://www. socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/3/3.html

Dicks, B. and Mason, B. (2001) Going beyond the code: the production of hypermedia ethnography. Social Science Computer Review 19: 445–57.

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D. and Chang, C. (1992) Assessing knowledge through gesture: using children’s hands to read their minds. Cognition and Instruction 9: 201–19.

Goodwin, C. (2002) Course CD for Applied Linguistics 260: ‘Discourse S02.’ cgoodwin@ humnet.ucla.edu

Goodwin, C. (2003) Pointing as situated practice. S. Kita (ed.) Pointing: where language, cognition and culture meet 217–41. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Harris, S. R. (2003) Barriers, breakdowns and breakthroughs: co–constructing collaborative computer–mediated learning activity. Presentation to the Design and Use of Information Technology Group, Copenhagen IT–University. June 12.

Hutchins, E. and Palen, L. (1997) Constructing meaning from space, gesture and speech. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo and B. Burge (eds) Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: essays on situated cognition 24–40. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.

Jones, S. E. and LeBaron, C. D. (2002a) Closing up closings: showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication 52(3): 542–63.

Jones, S. E. and LeBaron, C. D. (2002b) Research on the relationship between verbal and non-verbal communication: emerging integrations. Journal of Communication 52(3): 499–522.

Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4: 39–104.

Kendon, A. (1987) On gesture: its complementary relationship with speech. In A. W. Siegman and S. Feldstein (eds) Nonverbal Behavior and Communication 65–97. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kita, S. (2003a) Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation and language in pointing. In S. Kita (ed.) Pointing: where language, cognition and culture meet 307–28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kita, S. (2003b) Introduction. Pointing: a foundational building block in human communication. S. Kita (ed.) Pointing: where language, cognition and culture meet 1–8. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Knorr Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Knorr Cetina, K. (1991) Epistemic cultures: forms of reason in science. History of Political Economy 23: 105–22.

Koschmann, T. and LeBaron, C. (2002) Gesture and the transparency of understanding. In P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron and J. Mandelbaum (eds) Studies in Language and Social Interaction 119–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1999) Representation and interaction: designing the position of the viewer. In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds) The Discourse Reader 377–404. London: Routledge.

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

Latour, B. (1988) Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society 6: 1–40.

LeBaron, C. D. and Streeck, J. (2000) Gesture, knowledge and the world. In D. McNeill (ed.) Language and Gesture 118–38. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J. L. (2001.) The Long and the short of it: comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(1/2): 17–26.

Lemke, J. L. (2002) Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325.

McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K. and Aron, J. (1978) Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of activities and their contexts. Semiotica 24: 245–75.

McNeill, D. (1992) Hands and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Molotch, H. (2003) Where Stuff Comes From. London: Routledge.

Ochs, E. (1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (eds) Developmental Pragmatics 43–72. New York: Academic Press.

Pink, S. (2001) Doing Ethnography: images, media and representation in research. London: Sage.

Reder, S. (1993) Watching flowers grow: polycontextuality and heterochronicity at work. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 15(4): 116–24.

Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (2003) Uptake of discourse research in interprofessional settings: reporting from medical consultancy. Applied Linguistics 24(3): 338–59.

Saferstein, B. (1992) Collective cognition and collaborative work: the effects of cognitive and communicative processes on the organization of television production. Discourse and Society 3: 61–86.

Saferstein, B. (1995) Cognitive Sociology. In J. Verschueren, J.–O. Ostman and J. Blommaert (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics 140–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Saferstein, B. (1998) Ethnomethodology. In W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds) A Companion to Cognitive Science 391–401. Blackwell Publishers.

Saferstein, B. (1999) Interaction, representation and concept building: collaborative computer use in high school science classes. Presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago. August 6–10.

Saferstein, B. (2004) Explaining genetics and heredity by linking everyday experiences and scientific concepts: black boxes, belief, and understanding. Presented at the Workshop on The Nature of Explanations, Health Communication Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, June 10.

Saferstein, B. and Oiye, N. (1999) The intersection of language community and gender roles in collaborative learning in high school science classes. Presented at the Society for the Study of Social Problems Annual Meeting, Chicago. August 3–9.

Saferstein, B. and Souviney, R. (1997) Secondary science teachers, the internet and curriculum development: The Community of Explorers Project. The Journal of Educational Technology Systems 26(2): 113–26.

Sarangi, S. (2003) Discourse practitioners as a community of interprofessional practice: some insights from health communication research. In C. N. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse 95–135. Hong Kong: City University Press.

Streeck, J. (1993) Gesture as communication I: its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 60: 275–99.

Suchman, L. A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, L. A. and Trigg, R. H. (1991) Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds) Design at Work: cooperative design of computer systems 65–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thorn, C. (2002) Creating new histories of learning for math and science instruction: using NVivo and Transana to manage and study large multimedia datasets. Presented at the conference on Strategies in Qualitative Research. Institute of Education, University of London. 7–8 February.

Walker, R. and Lewis, R. (1998) Media convergence and social research: The Hathaway Project. In J. Prosser. (ed.) Image Based Research 162–75. London: Falmer Press.

Weaver, A. and Atkinson, P. (1994) Microcomputing and Qualitative Data Analysis. Aldershot: Avebury.

Published

2004-06-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Saferstein, B. (2004). Digital technology and methodological adaption: text on video as a resource for analytical reflexivity. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1(2), 197-123. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i2.197