Discourse and technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v6i3.379Keywords:
technology, intonation, non-verbal communication, conversation analysis, corpus linguistics, PowerPoint, multimodalityAbstract
The paper discusses three aspects of the relation between discourse and technology. The first is the influence of new communication technologies on the agenda of linguistics and discourse analysis. The beginning of radio broadcasting led to new theories of intonation and the beginning of television created an interest in linguistically inspired approaches to non-verbal communication. The second is the use of technologies as tools for discourse analysis. The move from film to the tape recorder and the subsequent birth of conversation analysis diminished the earlier interest in non-verbal communication, while today corpus linguistics challenges approaches that focus on the analysis of single, whole texts. Finally, contemporary software not only builds in spelling and grammar rules, but also text structure rules (templates), and systematic options for the use of layout, typography, colour, animation and other non-linguistic means of expression, leading to a renewed interest in multimodality. The paper concludes with the view that considerations of technology should be integrated with discourse analysis and cites the work of Ron and Suzie Scollon as an early example of this approach.
References
Birdwhistell, R. (1971) Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body-Motion Communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bolinger, D. (1974) Accent is predictable (if you’re a mind reader). Language 48 (3): 633– 644. doi:10.2307/412039
Brazil. D. (1995) A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cardiff, D. (1981) The serious and the popular: Aspects of the evolution of style in the Radio Talk 1928–1939. Media, Culture and Society 2 (1): 30–38.
Crystal, D. (1975) The English Tone of Voice. London: Arnold.
Erickson, F. (2004) Origins: A brief intellectual and technological history of the emergence of multimodal discourse analysis. In P. Levine and R. Scollon (eds) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, 196–207. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–169. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Farkas, D. K. (2006) Toward a better understanding of PowerPoint deck design. Information Design Journal 14 (2): 162–171. doi:10.1075/idj.14.2.08far
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodwin, C. (2001) Practices of seeing visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis, 157–182. London: Sage.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985a) Spoken and Written Language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985b) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Jewitt, C. (2006) Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Levine, P. and Scollon, R. (eds) (2004) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Marcuse, H. (1961) Language and technological society. Dissent 8 (1): 66–74.
Martinec, R. (1998) Cohesion in action. Semiotica 120 (1/2): 161–180. doi:10.1515/ semi.1998.120.1-2.161
Martinec, R. (2000) Types or process in action. Semiotica 130 (3/4): 243–268. doi:10.1515/ semi.2000.130.3-4.243
Martinec, R. (2001) Interpersonal resources in action. Semiotica 135 (1/4): 177–145.
Mautner, G. (2009) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 122–144. London: Sage.
McLuhan, M. (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy. New York: New American Library.
Mumford, L. (1934) Technics and Civilisation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Norris, S. (2002) The implication of visual research for discourse analysis: Transcription beyond language. Visual Communication 1 (1): 97–121. doi:10.1177/147035720200100108
Norris, S. (2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
Ochs, E. (1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. B. Schiefflen (eds) Developmental Pragmatics, 43–72. New York: Academic Press.
Ong, W. J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen. doi:10.4324/9780203328064
Parker, I. (2001) Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts? New Yorker 28 May, 76–87.
Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F. and Danehy, J. J. (1960) The First Five Minutes. New York: Martineau.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004) Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
Trager, G. and Hall, E. T. (1954) Culture and communication: A model and an analysis. Explorations 3: 137–149.
Tufte, E. R. (2004) The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Cheshire CT: Graphics Press.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1999) Speech, Music, Sound. London: Macmillan.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2009) A semiotics of the voice. In G. Harper, R. Doughty and J. Eisentraut (eds) Sound and Music in Film and Visual Media: An Overview, 425–437. London: Continuum.
Ward, I. C. (1939) The Phonetics of English. Cambridge: Heffer.
Williams, R. (1974) Television, Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana. doi:10.4324/9780203426647
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.