Religion Studies

From University to School

Authors

  • Peta Goldburg Australian Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/arsr.v22i1.13

Keywords:

Religious Education, Study of Religion

Abstract

As a religious educator I am passionate about the teaching of religion in the school sector and I see the Study of Religion as a critical component in the education of all students. I believe all schools should teach religion; that all students should be engaged in the critical study of religion; and that we need continually to shape and re-shape the ways in which religion in schools is taught. The paper is in three sections. The first section comments on the teaching of religion in schools and in particular traces the shift in teaching styles from enfaithing (Lovat 2002) approaches to educational approaches. The second section centres on the development of Study of Religion courses in the senior years of secondary schools and the growing popularity of such courses. In the third section, I will offer a critique of current practice in the area of Study of Religion in schools and suggest some ways forward which I believe will strengthen the teaching of Study of Religion.

Author Biography

  • Peta Goldburg, Australian Catholic University

    Professor of Religious Education; Head of the National School of Religious Education

References

Boys, Mary 2004 Seeing Different Movies, Talking Past Each Other. In Perspectives on the Passion of the Christ, 147-64. Miramax Books, New York.

Burbules, Nicholas C. 1993 Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. Teachers College Press, New York.

Flood, Gavin 1999 Beyond Phenomenology: Rethinking the Study of Religion. Cassell, London.

Franzmann, Majella 2002 From Queen of the Sciences to the Rebel Alliance: Religion in the University. Australian Religion Studies Review 15(2): 5-12.

Freire, Paulo 1972 Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Sheed & Ward, London.

Goldburg, Peta 2001 The New Queensland Syllabus for Study of Religion: Wider Possibilities and Greater Flexibility. Journal of Religious Education 49(2): 37-40.

Broadening Approaches to Religious Education through Constructivist Pedagogy. Journal of Religious Education 55(2): 8-12.

Green, Bill 1988 Subject-specific Literacy and School Learning: A Focus on Writing. Australian Journal of Education 32(2): 156-79.

Hobson, Peter R., and John S. Edwards 1999 Religious Education in a Pluralist Society: The Key Philosophical Issues. Woburn Press, London.

Homan, Roger 2004 Religion and Literacy: Observations on Religious Education and the Literacy Strategy for Secondary Education in Britain. British Journal of Religious Education 26(1): 21-32. doi:10.1080/0141620032000149890.

Jackson, Robert 1997 Religious Education: An Interpretive Approach. Hodder & Stoughton, London.

Kristensen, W. Brede 1960 The Meaning of Religion. Martinus Nijoff, The Hague.

Lo Bianco, Joe 2000 Multiliteracies and Multilingualism. In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 92-105. Macmillan, London.

Lovat, Terence J. 1989 What Is This Thing Called Religious Education? Summary, Critique and a New Proposal. Social Science Press, Wentworth Falls.

Religious Studies: The Way Ahead for Religious Literacy and Adherence. Paper presented at the International Congress of Religion (July), Melbourne.

a A History and Critique of Critical Religious Education in Catholic Schools. In Potential and Opportunity: Critical Issues for Australian Catholic Education into the 21st Century, edited by H. Raduntz, 177-89. Auslib Press, Adelaide.

b Teaching and Learning Religion: A Phenomenological Approach. Social Science Press, Wentworth Falls.

a The Ideological Challenge of the Public Syllabus in Religious Studies. In Echo and Silence: Contemporary Issues in Religious Education, edited by M. Ryan, 1-13. Social Science Press, Katoomba.

b In Defence of Phenomenology. Religious Education 96(2): 462-69.

What is the Thing Called RE: A Decade On? Social Science Press, Katoomba.

Luke, Allan, and Peter Freebody 1999 A Map of Possible Practices: Further Notes on the Four Resources Model. Practically Primary 4(2): 1-4.

Moore, Basil, and Norman Habel 1982 When Religion Goes to School: Typology of Religion for the Classroom.Texts in Humanities, Adelaide.

Moran, Gabriel 1970 Design for Religion: Toward Ecumenical Education. Search Press, London.

Interplay: A Theory of Religion and Education. St Mary’s College Press, Winona.

New South Wales Board of Studies (NSWBOS) 1994 Studies in Religion. New South Wales Board of Studies, Sydney.

Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies (QBSSS) 1989 Study of Religion. QBSSS, Brisbane.

Rummery, Gerard M. 1975 Catechesis and Religious Education in a Pluralist Society. E.J. Dwyer, Sydney.

Ryan, Maurice 1997 Foundations of Religious Education in Catholic Schools: An Australian Perspective. Social Science Press, Wentworth Falls.

Smart, Ninian 1989 The World’s Religions. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Unsworth, Len 2001 Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Open University Press, Bucking-ham.

van der Leeuw, Gerardus 1963 Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology. Harper & Row, New York.

Wooldridge, Nathalie 2001 Tensions and Ambiguities in Critical Literacy. In Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms, edited by B. Comber and A. Simpson, 259-70. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.

Wright, Andrew 1993 Religious Education in the Secondary School: Prospects for Religious Literacy. David Fulton Publishers, London.

Published

2009-08-17

Issue

Section

Penny Magee Memorial Lecture

How to Cite

Goldburg, P. (2009). Religion Studies: From University to School. Journal for the Academic Study of Religion, 22(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1558/arsr.v22i1.13

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>