Burns, Baby, Burns

jazz history as a contested cultural site

Authors

  • Alan Stanbridge University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/source.v1i1.82

Keywords:

jazz, jazz musicians, history of jazz, modern jazz

Abstract

The controversial critical reception of Ken Burns’s PBS documentary Jazz (2001) served to highlight the extent to which jazz history remains a highly contested cultural site. The debate over Burns’s documentary played out in both the popular press and academic journals throughout late-2000 and 2001,1 and still offers a lively discussion topic in jazz circles. Although the title of my paper might appear to hold out the promise of a review of the links between Ken Burns’s work and 1970s disco music, these are avenues that I will leave unexplored. Rather, my concern is to examine the manner in which the controversy represented another ongoing skirmish on the discursive battlefield that is jazz history, suggesting the need for a considerably broader conceptualization of jazz – and jazz history – than that offered in Burns’s documentary.

Author Biography

  • Alan Stanbridge, University of Toronto

    Alan Stanbridge is an Assistant Professor in Visual and Performing Arts and Arts Management at the University of Toronto, and is cross-appointed in the Graduate Department of Music and the Museum Studies Program. His ongoing interdisciplinary research program focuses on twentieth-century popular music, jazz, and new music, exploring the manner in which discursive practices have served to influence the production, circulation, and reception of this music, and examining the processes of canon formation which have shaped contemporary understandings of musical meaning and cultural value. Stanbridge has published articles on cultural theory, cultural policy, postmodernism, and musicology.

References

-

Published

2004-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Stanbridge, A. (2004). Burns, Baby, Burns: jazz history as a contested cultural site. Jazz Research Journal, 1(1), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.1558/source.v1i1.82