Interaction in conversation in Huntington´s disease

An activity-based analysis and the conversation partner’s view of change

Authors

  • Charlotta Saldert University of Gothenburg
  • Elisabeth Eriksson University of Gothenburg
  • Kerstin Petersson University of Gothenburg
  • Lena Hartelius University of Gothenburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i2.169

Keywords:

talk-in-interaction, communication impairment, social interaction, pragmatics, neurodegenerative disease

Abstract

This study explores how conversational interaction is affected in a progressive neurological disease and what changes in the communication are reported by significant others in a questionnaire. Three dyads, each consisting of a person with Huntington’s disease and a conversational partner, were video-recorded, and the conversations were analysed with respect to the parameters in the questionnaire and also with the method Activity-based Communication Analysis. The analyses revealed that several important aspects of communication were affected by the disease in each of the three cases presented here. Most, but not all, of these changes in communication were also reported by the significant other in the questionnaire. These results show that it is important to look out for possible communication problems when managing individuals with Huntington’s disease. The questionnaire utilised in this study, with some modifications, seems to be a promising instrument for use in a clinical setting.

References

Ahlsén, E. (1995). Pragmatics and Aphasia – An Activity-based Approach. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 77. Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.

Allwood, J. (1976). Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2. Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.

Allwood, J., Nivre, J. and Ahlsén, E. (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1093/jos/9.1.1

Atkinson M. and Heritage J. (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bates, G., Harper, P. and Jones, L. (2002). Huntington’s Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chenery, H., Copland, D. and Murdoch, B. (2002). Complex language functions and subcortical mechanisms: evidence from Huntington’s disease and patients with nonthalamic sub-cortical lesions. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 37 (4): 459–474. doi:10.1080/1368282021000007730

Ferm, U., Ahlsén, E. and Björck-Åkesson, E. (2005). Conversational topics between a child with complex communication needs and her caregiver at mealtime. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 21 (1): 19–40. doi:10.1080/07434610412331270507

Ferm, U., Sahlin A., Sundin, L. and Hartelius, L. (2009). Using talking mats to support communication in persons with Huntington’s disease. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 45 (5): 523–536. doi: 10.3109/13682820903105145.

Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodwin M. H. and Goodwin C. (1986). Gesture and co-participation in the activity of searching for the word. Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75. doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51

Guendouzi, J. and Müller, N. (2006). Approaches to Discourse in Dementia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834

Hamilton, H. E. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627774

Hartelius, L., Carlstedt, A., Ytterberg, M., Lillvik, M. and Laakso, K. (2003). Speech disorders in mild and moderate Huntington disease: results of dysarthria assessments of 19 individuals. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 11: 1–14.

Hartelius, L. Jonsson, M., Rickeberg, A. and Laakso, K. (2010). Communication and Huntington disease: Qualitative interviews with persons with Huntington’s disease, family members and caregivers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 45 (3): 381-393. doi: 10.3109/13682820903105145.

Henry, J. D., Crawford, J. R. and Phillips, L. H. (2005). A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency deficits in Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychology 19 (2): 243–252. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.2.243

Ho, A. K., Sahakian B. J., Brown, R. G., Barker, R. A., Hodges, J. R., Ané, M.-N., Snowden, J., Thompon, J., Esmonde, T., Gentry, R., Moore, J. W. and Bodner, T. (2003). Profile of cognitive progression in early Huntington’s disease. Neurology 61: 1702–1706.

Larimore, C. (1998). Evaluation review. Brain Injury 12 (7): 629–630. doi:10.1080/026990598122403

Mikesell, L. (2009). Conversational practices of a frontotemporal dementia patient and his interlocutors. Research on Language & Social Interaction: 42 (2): 135–162.

Müller, N. and Guendouzi, J. (2005). Order and disorder in conversation: Encounters with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics: 19 (5), 393–404. doi:10.1080/02699200400027213

Murray, L. L. (2000). Spoken language production in Huntington’s and Parkinson’s Diseases. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 43: 1350–1366.

McNeill, D. (ed.) (2000). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peat, J. K., Mellis, C., Williams, K. and Xuan, W. (2001). Health Science Research. London: Sage Publications.

Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic Impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486555

Perkins, L., Whitworth, A. and Lesser, R. (1997). Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Cognitive Impairment (CAPPCI). London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50 (4): 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243

Saldert, C. (2006). Inference and Conversational Interaction: Pragmatic Language Disturbances Related to Stroke. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 30 (Doctoral thesis). Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.

Saldert, C., Fors, A., Strömberg, S. and Hartelius, L. (2010). Comprehension of complex discourse in different stages of Huntington's disease. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 45 (6): 656-669. doi:10.3109/13682820903494742.

Saldert, C. and Hartelius, L. (2010). Echolalia or functional repetition in Huntington’s disease. E-print ahead of publication, posted online on 10 Sept 2010. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.514971

Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361–382. doi:10.2307/413107

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Shoulson, G. and Fahn, S. (1979). Huntington’s disease. Clinical care and evaluation. Neurology 29: 1–3.

Watson, C., Chenery, H. and Carter, M. (1999). An analysis of trouble and repair in the natural conversations of people with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Aphasiology 13 (3): 195–218. doi:10.1080/026870399402181

Whitworth, A., Lesser, R. and McKeith, I. (1999). Profiling conversation in Parkinson’s disease with cognitive impairment. Aphasiology 13 (4&5): 407–425. doi:10.1080/026870399402154

Wilkinson R, Beeke S. and Maxim J. (2003). Adapting to conversation. In C. Goodwin (ed.) Conversation and Brain Damage 59–89. New York: Oxford University Press.

Published

2011-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Saldert, C., Eriksson, E., Petersson, K., & Hartelius, L. (2011). Interaction in conversation in Huntington´s disease: An activity-based analysis and the conversation partner’s view of change. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1(2), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i2.169