“First impressions”

Perceptions of communicative abilities in people with traumatic brain injury

Authors

  • Kacia McCaghren Cumberland Therapy Services
  • Jacki Guendouzi Southeastern Louisiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i1.101

Keywords:

traumatic brain injury, social interactions, first impressions

Abstract

People who have suffered traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have difficulties with social interactions, as well as developing and maintaining relationships. This may be due to deficits in pragmatic language abilities that have been documented in the research. These deficits can cause a person that has endured a TBI to make a negative first impression; this may lead social partners to make poor judgments about the person’s personality or mood. The aim of this study was to examine untrained observers’ ‘first impressions’ of the communication skills of people with TBI and to determine if any differences exist between untrained observer impressions and the first impressions of speech language pathologists. Twenty-four untrained observers and 12 Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) viewed videotaped recordings of four people with TBI. The participants completed a two part observations sheet. In the first section, observers wrote a description of the speakers’ communication skills. In the second section, observers provided three self-generated lexical items that best described the speakers’ communicative ability. Descriptive textual linguistic analysis and thematic categorization were used to focus analyzes on the perceptions of the untrained observers and assess what particular aspects of the speakers' communication were viewed as problematic. In contrast to the SLPs, the untrained observers’ responses focused on the non-verbal behaviors of people with TBI in a negative manner. The results suggest that (a) a greater focus on non-verbal behaviours may be an important aspect of therapy, and (b) professionals may benefit from input from non professionals when judging the readiness of people with TBI to interact successfully in the community.

Author Biographies

  • Kacia McCaghren, Cumberland Therapy Services

    Kacia McCaghren received her Ph.D. in Communication Sciences and Disorders from the University of South Alabama, Mobile. She is currently working as a clinician for People First Rehabilitation in a skilled nursing facility in Jacksonville, North Carolina. Her clinical and research interests include neurogenic communication disorders and swallowing disorders in the adult and geriatric populations.

  • Jacki Guendouzi, Southeastern Louisiana University

    Jacqueline Guendouzi received her PhD in Linguistics from Cardiff University, Wales. She is currently Associate Professor at Southeastern Louisiana University. Her research interests include psycholinguistics and discourse analysis. Her publications include: Guendouzi, J. and Müller, N. (2006) Approaches to Discourse in Dementia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; Guendouzi, J., Loncke, F. and Williams, M (2010) Handbook of Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Processes: Perspectives in Communication Disorders. New York: Psychology Press; Guendouzi, J. (2006) ‘The guilt thing’: Balancing domestic and professional roles, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 901-909.

References

Adamovich, B. L. and Henderson, J. (1992). Scales of Cognitive Ability (SCATBI). Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.

Addington, D. W. (1968a). Voice and perception of personality: An experimental study. Oklahoma State University Monographs (Social Science Series), 15.

Alexander, M. P., Benson, D. F. and Stuss, D. T. (1989). Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language 37 (4): 656?691. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90118-1

American Speech-Language and Hearing Association. (1997). Guidelines for Audiologic Screening [Guidelines]. Available from www.asha.org/policy

ASHA http://www.asha.org/about/membership-certification/member-counts.htm

Banaji, M. R. Harden, C. D. and Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (2): 136?141. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.272

Barr, J., McLeod, S. and Daniel, G. (2008). Siblings of children with speech impairment: Cavalry on the hill. Language, Speech, and hearing Services in Schools 39 (1): 21?32. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/003)

Biernat, M. and Vescio, T. K. (1993). Categorization and stereotyping: Effects of group context on memory and social judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 65: 131?141.

Berry, D. S. and MacArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (2): 312?323. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.312

Bruns, J. and Hauser, W. A. (2003). The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review. Epilepsia 44 (10): 2?10. doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x

Bollinger, R. L. (1988). Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center Communication Screening. Unpublished manuscript.

Cheepen, C. (1988). The Predictability of Informal Conversation. London: Pinter.

Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A. and Fenn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 19 (13): 1139?1145. doi:10.1080/02699050500110678

Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z. and Duffy, R. J. (1991). Discourse analyses with closed-head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 72 (7): 465?468.

Donnelly, J. P., Donnelly, K. and Grohman, K. K. (2005). A multi-perspective concept mapping of the problems associated with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 19 (13): 1077?1085. doi:10.1080/02699050500110728

Douglas, J. M., Bracy, C. A. and Snow, P. C. (2007a). Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: Reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 22 (1): 31?38. doi:10.1097/00001199-200701000-00004

Douglas, J. M., Bracy, C. A. and Snow, P. C. (2007b). Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 21 (12): 1181?1194. doi:10.1080/02687030600980950

Douglas, J. M., O’Flaherty, C. A. and Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology 14 (3): 251?268. doi:10.1080/026870300401469

Dumont, C., Gervais, M., Fougeyrollas, P. and Bertrand, R. (2004). Toward an explanatory model of social participation for adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 19 (6): 431?444. doi:10.1097/00001199-200411000-00002

Fazio, R. H. and Dunton, B. C. (1997). Categorization by race: The impact of automatic and controlled components of racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 33 (5): 451?470. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1330

Gilbert, D. T. and Krull, D. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (2): 193?202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.193

Goffman, E. (1963). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman, E. (1986). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Touchstone Books.

Guo, Y. E. and Togher, L. (2008). The impact of dysarthria on everyday communication after traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 22 (1): 83?97. doi:10.1080/02699050701824150

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to Mean. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; London: Edward Arnold.

Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Hoofien, D., Gilboa, A., Vakil, E. and Donovick, P. J. (2001). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10?20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 15 (3): 189?209. doi:10.1080/026990501300005659

Hough, M. S., Pierce, R. S., Difilippo, M. and Pabst, M. J. (1997). Access and organization of goal-derived categories. Brain Injury 11 (11): 801?814. doi:10.1080/026990597123016

Jones, E. E. and Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 3 (10): 1?24. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0

Jussim, L. Coleman, L. M. and Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (3): 536?546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536

Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H. and Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.

Kilov, A., Togher, L. and Grant, S. (2009). Problem solving with friends: Discourse participation and performance of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 23 (5): 584?605. doi:10.1080/02687030701855382

Lazzari, A. M. (1990). Just for Adults: An Adult Handbook for Language Rehabilitation. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.

Levin, H. S., Brown, S. A., Song, J. X., McCauley, S. R., Boake, C., Contant, C. F., Goodman, H. and Kotrla, K. J. (2001). Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder at three months after mild to moderate TBI. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23 (6): 754?769. doi:10.1076/jcen.23.6.754.1021

Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford.

MacLennon, D. L., Cornis-Pop, M., Picon-Nieto, L. and Sigford, B. (2002). The prevalence of pragmatic communication impairments in traumatic brain injury. Premier Outlook 3 (4): 1?9.

McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 44 (1): 28?46. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1003

McDonald, S. and Flanagan, S. (2004). Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology 18 (3): 572?579. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.572

McGann, W. and Werven, G. (1995). Social competence and head injury: A new emphasis. Brain Injury 9 (1): 93?102. doi:10.3109/02699059509004575

McGann, W., Werven, G. and Douglass, M. M. (1997). Social competence and head injury: A practical approach. Brain Injury 11 (9): 621?628. doi:10.1080/026990597123179

Mentis, M. and Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30 (1): 88?98.

Morton, M. V. and Wheman, P. W. (1995). Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury 9 (1): 81?92. doi:10.3109/02699059509004574

Olson, M. A. and Fazio, R. H. (2004). Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26 (1): 1?11. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2601_1

Penn, C. (1999). Pragmatic assessment and therapy for persons with brain damage: What have clinicians gleaned in two decades? Brain and Language 68 (3): 535?552. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2127

Penn, C. (2000). Clinical pragmatics and assessment of adult language disorders. In N. Muller (ed.). Pragmatics in Speech & Language Pathology 107?124. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Perkins, M. R. (2008). Pragmatic impairment as an emergent phenomenon. In M. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Muller and S. Howard (eds) The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, 79?91. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rosenbaum, J. G. (1982). Rosenbaum Vision Pocket Screener. Quincy, MA: Grass Instrument Company.

Scherer, K. (1979). Personality markers in speech. In K. R. Scherer and H. Giles (eds) Social Markers in Speech, 147?201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schwartz, I. S. and Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24 (2): 189?204. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189

Shelley-Tremblay, J. (2010) Theories of semantic processing. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke and M. J. Williams (e4ds.) The Handbook of Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Processes: Perspectives in Communication Disorders, 209?226. New York: Psychology Press.

Sherif, M. (1967). Social Interaction – Processes and Products. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

Sherif, M. and Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sherif, M., Sherif, C. and Nebergall, R. (1965). Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-involvement Approach. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

Sillars, A. L. (1982). Attribution and communication. In M. E. Roloff and Charles, E. Berger (eds) Social Cognition and Communication, 73?106. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Snyder, C. S. and Hux, K. (2000). Truamatic brain injury survivors’ ability to reduce idiosyncrasy in semantic organization. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 8 (3): 187?197.

Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1124: 53?62. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.012

Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A. and Hart, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308 (5728): 1623?1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589

Togher, L. and Hand, L. (1998). Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: An investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 12 (7/8): 755?770. doi:10.1080/02687039808249571

Togher, L. and Hand, L. (1999). The macrostructure of the interview: Are traumatic brain injury interactions structured differently to control interactions? Aphasiology 13 (9?11): 709?723. doi:10.1080/026870399401821

Togher, L., Hand, L. and Code, C. (1996). A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disability and Rehabilitation 18 (11): 559?566. doi:10.3109/09638289609166317

Togher, L., Hand, L. and Code, C. (1997a). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 11 (3): 169?189. doi:10.1080/026990597123629

Togher, L., Hand, L. and Code, C. (1997b). Measuring service encounters with the traumatic brain injury population. Aphasiology 11 (4?5): 491?504. doi:10.1080/02687039708248486

Turkstra, L. (2005). Looking while listening and speaking: Eye-to-face gaze in adolescents with and without traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48 (6): 1429–1441. doi:10.1044/1092-438 (2005/099)

Turkstra, L. S. (2001). Partner effects in adolescent conversations. Journal of Communication Disorders 34 (1?2): 151?162. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00046-0

Turkstra, L. S. and Kennedy, M. R. T. (2008). Traumatic brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation: Current approaches to research, reimbursement, and clinical treatment. ASHA Leader 15 July: 10?13.

Vanderploeg, R. D., Crowell, T. A. and Curtiss, G. (2001). Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury: Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23 (2): 185?195. doi:10.1076/jcen.23.2.185.1210

Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis 11 (20): 203?214. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203

Ylvisaker, M. and Szekeres, S. F. (1987). Topics in cognitive rehabilitation therapy. In M. Ylvisaker and E. Gobble (eds) Community Re-entry for Head Injured Adults, 259-299. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co.

Ylvisaker, M. and Szekeres, S. F. (1994). Communication disorders associated with closed head injury. In R. Chapey (ed.). Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia, 546?568. Baltimore, MD: Wilkins-Wilkin.

Published

2011-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

McCaghren, K., & Guendouzi, J. (2011). “First impressions”: Perceptions of communicative abilities in people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(1), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i1.101

Most read articles by the same author(s)