The “Unseen Engineer”
Linguistic Patterning in War Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v2i1.59Keywords:
Systemic Functional Linguistics, War Discourse, Discourse Analysis, Iraq WarAbstract
A number of linguistic studies in recent decades have sought to explain the nature of war discourses, and a number of recurring features have been identified (van Leeuwen, in press). Taking a corpus of press briefings by Coalition military spokesman from the beginning of the Iraq invasion, this paper combines detailed grammatical analysis (based on four days of briefings), with an excursus into prosodic motifs created through certain lexical tendencies (based on seven days of briefings), in order to explore the kind of ‘existential fabric’ (Butt, 1988) this discourse creates in its particular representation of the phenomenal realm of war. The grammatical method involves the analysis of the experiential function of language, using systemic functional grammar. An additional resource drawn on is Roget’s Thesaurus, against which particular elements of the discourse – such as the lexical verbs which construe material action – are mapped. The analysis reveals the lexical and grammatical patterns which function as resources for muting the intensely violent nature of war.
References
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second edition. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999) Construing Experience Through Meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. London: Arnold.
Hasan, R. (1985/1989) The structure of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan (eds) Language, Context and Text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. pp 52–69. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Knightly, P. (2000) The First Casualty: the war correspondent as hero and myth-maker from the Crimea to Kosovo. London: Prion.
Lasswell, H. (1927) Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Long, R. (2004) Statement. http://www.americanfreepress.net/04_06_04/Media_ Coverage/media_coverage.html
Lukin, A. (2005a) Mapping media bias: a multidimensional affair. Australian Journalism Review 27(1): 139–155.
Lukin, A. (2005b) The grammar of life – in dialogue with Don Watson’s death sentence. Arena (23): 111–127.
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation – Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995) Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publisher.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999) The system of TRANSITIVITY: an exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language 6(1): 1–5.
McGeough, P. (2003) US fears hard, bloody war. Sydney Morning Herald, p1.
Roget, S. R. ([1852] 1953) Roget’s Thesaurus. Middlesex: Penguin.
Tumber, H. and Palmer, J. (2004) Media at War: the Iraq crisis. London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, T. (2006) War rhetoric. Elsevier Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. pp516–520. Elsevier.
Wolff, M. (2003) I was only asking. Originally published at media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,936087,00.html now available at http://www.16beavergroup.org/ mtarchive/archives/000047.php
Wu, C. (2000) Modelling Linguistic Resources. Department of Linguistics: Macquarie University, Sydney