Old houses, linguistics and literature in schools
what stylistic analysis can offer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v3i2.191Keywords:
Literature, Stylistic Analysis, Systemic Functional Linguistics, EducationAbstract
This article seeks to demonstrate how socially relevant linguistic analysis, using a sufficiently ‘extravagant’ theoretical framework, can provide a founded argument for the value of particular literary texts – and more generally the social, cultural and intellectual worth of literature – in a school curriculum. Through a stylistic analysis using Systemic Functional Grammar of a poem by one of Singapore’s foremost writers, it examines how its language patterns artistically coalesce into a secondary patterning to encode important socio-historical information and thematic issues of relevance to National Education, a key concern of Singapore schools. Thus, it reveals and suggests how literature can be used to meet this concern, as well as another key concern, the stimulation of critical and creative thinking, while simultaneously enhancing awareness of the power of language in the construction of meaning. In so doing, it suggests how literature should have a central place in the school curriculum.
References
Griffiths, G. (1999) (W)rites of identity: the place of new literatures in English in the educational curriculum. In S. H. Chua and W. P. Chin (eds) Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore 13–24. Singapore: National Institute of Education, National Technological University.
Halliday, M. A. K. ([1964] 2002) The linguistic study of literary texts. In The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 2. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd edition.) London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd edition.) London: Edward Arnold.
Hasan, R. (1985) Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Holden, P. (1999) The great literature debate: why teach literature in Singapore? In S. H. Chua and W. P. Chin (eds) Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore 79–89. Singapore: National Institute of Education, National Technological University.
Jeffries, L. (1996) What makes English into art? In J. Maybin and N. Mercer (eds) Using English: From Conversation to Canon 162–184. London: Routledge.
Koh, T. A. (1995) Literature, the beloved of language. In James (ed.) (1996) The LanguageCulture Connection. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. Selected papers from the RELC Regional Seminar on Exploring Language, Culture and Literature in Language Learning. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore 17–19 April 1995.
Lin, B. (2001) Reinventing the Relevance of Literature in Secondary Schools in Singapore: The Appraisal of Three Poems using Stylistic Analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis. Available at the SEAMEO RELC and National University of Singapore libraries, Singapore.
Lukin, A. and Webster, J. (2005) SFL and the study of literature. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective. Vol. 1. London: Equinox.
Martin, J. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse. London: Continuum.
Singh, K. (1997) Literature in the Singapore classroom: challenges for the future. In S. H. Chua and W. P. Chin (eds) Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore 62–67. Singapore: National Institute of Education, National Technological University.
Yahya, Z. (1999) Strategic alliance: the English department and nation building. In S. H. Chua and W. P. Chin (eds) Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore 25–31. Singapore: National Institute of Education, National Technological University
