Conceptualising the mediator as ‘follower’ instead of ‘leader’

An explorative approach

Authors

  • Roger Seaman Workplace Mediation South

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/mtp.41256

Keywords:

facilitative mediation, neutrality, community mediation, employment mediation

Abstract

Mediation is a term used to cover a wide and diverse range of practices by which third parties intervene to help others resolve their conflicts. This paper delineates a style of intervention in which the mediator is relatively passive and mostly seeks to follow the parties’ conversation. This follower style is set within a wider spectrum of practice in which mediators, to a lesser or greater extent, manage and lead the parties in their discussions. Resting upon an understanding of the social construction of identity, this paper argues that by predominantly ‘following’ the parties, a conversational space may be opened up, thereby increasing scope for the parties to enter into an exploratory dialogue about their conflict to find their own, robust solutions.

Author Biography

  • Roger Seaman, Workplace Mediation South

    Roger Seaman has been a mediator and facilitator since 2002. He was awarded a PhD for a study of workplace mediation in 2011. He interleaves practice, reflection and writing on mediation with part-time community work.

References

Beer, J. E. and Stief, E. (1997) The Mediator’s Handbook, 3rd edition. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

Bohm, D. (1999a) On Dialogue. London: Routledge.

Bohm, D. (1999b) Thought as a System. London: Routledge.

Boserup, H. ( 2004) Advanced techniques and dilemmas in mediation: the issue of autonomy and social control in particular. A paper presented to the Third Conference of the European Forum for Victim Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice, Budapest, Hungary, 14–16 October 2004. Retrieved from www.euforumrj.org/readingroom/Budapest/workshop19.pdf.

Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, J. P. (1994) The Promise of Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, J. P. (1996) Transformative mediation and third-party inter­vention: the ten hallmarks of a transformative approach to practice. Mediation Quarterly 13(4): 263–78.

Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, J. P. (2005) The Promise of Mediation, revised edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900130403

Cloke, K. (2001) Mediating Dangerously: The Frontiers of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Dingwall, R. (1988) Empowerment or enforcement? Some questions about power and control. In R. Dingwall and J. Eekelaar (eds) Divorce Mediation and the Legal Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gaynier, L. (2005) Transformative mediation: in search of a theory of practice Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22(3): 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.110

Granville, K. (2109) The Lieutenant. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.

Gulliver, P. H. (1977) On mediators. In I. Hamnett (ed.) ASA Monograph 14 Social Anthropology and Law. London: Academic Press.

Gulliver, P. H. (1979) Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.

Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Irvine, C. (2007) Transformative mediation: a critique. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691847. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1691847

Jorgensen, E. O., Moen, J. K., Antes, J. R., Hudson, D. T. and Hendrikson, L. H. (2001) Microfocus in mediation: the what and how of transformative opportunities. In J. P. Folger and R. A. Bush (eds) Designing Mediation: Approaches to Training and Practice within a Transformative Perspective 133–49. New York: The Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation.

Kressel, K. (2006) Mediation revisited. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman and E. C. Marcus (eds) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice 726–56. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Milner, N. (1996) Mediation and political theory: a critique of Bush and Folger. Law and Social Inquiry 21(3): 737–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1996.tb00095.x

Moore, C. W. (2003) The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict, 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Noll, D. E. (2001) A theory of mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal 56(2): 78–84.

Riskin, L. L. (1996) Understanding mediators’ orientations, strategies, and techniques: a grid for the perplexed. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1(7): 7–50.

Roberts, M. (1992) Who is in charge? Reflections on recent research on the role of the mediator. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 15: 372–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069208412366

Roberts, S. (1983) Mediation in family disputes. The Modern Law Review 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1983.tb02533.x

Seaman, R. J. (2016) Explorative Mediation at Work: The Importance of Dialogue for Mediation Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51674-9

Silbey, S. S. and Merry, S. E. (1986). Mediator settlement strategies. Law and Policy 8(1): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1986.tb00368.x

Torfing, J. (1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

Williams, M. (1997) Can’t I get no satisfaction? Thoughts on the promise of mediation. Mediation Quarterly 5(2): 143–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900150208

Published

2020-06-25

Issue

Section

Practice Articles

How to Cite

Seaman, R. (2020). Conceptualising the mediator as ‘follower’ instead of ‘leader’: An explorative approach. Mediation Theory and Practice, 4, 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1558/mtp.41256