CALICO Journal, Vol 34, No 1 (2017)

The Development of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in L2 Written Production through Informal Participation in Online Activities

Meryl Kusyk
Issued Date: 24 Jan 2017

Abstract


Research into the online informal learning of English (OILE) examines how non-native speakers of English may develop L2 skills through participation in leisure activities on the Internet in the target language. Such activities include, e.g., watching television series, films or videos, interacting on Facebook, reading articles or listening to music. Recent OILE studies have focused on students at French universities and have sought to both inventory language users’ online participation habits and track their L2 development (Kusyk & Sockett, 2012; Sockett, 2011; Sockett, 2014; Toffoli & Sockett, 2015; Sockett & Kusyk, 2015). This paper provides updated OILE participation data on French students and, for the first time, German university students. In order to increase awareness about current OILE practices, results of a questionnaire (N = 953) of OILE habits are presented. In addition, development in complexity, accuracy and fluency of three individual study participants was tracked over a period of five months. Results show a great deal of inter- and intraindividual variation, highlighting the need to consider L2 development as a complex and nonlinear process, especially when analyzed within an online, informal context.

Download Media

PDF Subscribers Only

DOI: 10.1558/cj.29513

References


Aubin, D., & Dahan Dalmedico, A. (2002). Writing the history of dynamical systems and chaos: Longue durée and revolution, disciplines and cultures. Historia Mathematica, 29(3), 273–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.2002.2351


Baba, K. & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033


Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014


Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY; London: Routledge.


Bybee, J., & Beckner, C. (2009). Usage-based theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–855). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0032


Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x


Cook, V. (2002). Background to the L2 User. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 User (pp. 1–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.


Council of Europe. (2011). Common reference levels self-assessment grid. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/elp/elpreg/Source/assessement_grid/assessment_grid_english.pdf


de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.01deb


de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M. (2103). Dynamic systems theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. d. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutiérrez Mangado, & M. M. Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamics Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732


Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.


Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [+/− Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. d. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136–156). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.


Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.09kaw


Kusyk, M., & Sockett, G. (2012). From informal resource usage to incidental language acquisition: Language uptake from online television viewing in English. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 62, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.3104


Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.


Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141


Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029


Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten “lessons” from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.


Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a Complex Systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x


Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044


Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., & Zochowski, M. (2005). The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.004


Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17–30). Oxford: Heinemann.


Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585


Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047


Sockett, G. (2011). From the cultural hegemony of English to online informal learning: Cluster frequency as an indicator of relevance in authentic documents. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 60, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2469


Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414885


Sockett, G., & Kusyk, M. (2015). Online informal learning of English: Frequency effects in the uptake of chunks of language from participation in web-based activities. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 153–177). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-009


Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks. The effects of collaboration. In M. d. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157–177). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.


Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 58, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1851


Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). University teachers’ perceptions of online informal learning of English (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776970


Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012


Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576164.005


van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.3


van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Development as Self-Organization: New Approaches to the Psychology and Neurobiology of Development, 25(3–4), 408–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003


VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in conciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(03), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177


Vercellotti, M. L. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002


Verspoor, M., & Behrens, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to second language development. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29


Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29


Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructure for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 75–101). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-006


Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production (Doctoral dissertation). Temple University. Available from ProQuest dissertation and theses database. UMI No.9813575.


Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]

Privacy Policy