An Empirical Study on Vocabulary Recall and Learner Autonomy through Mobile‑Assisted Language Learning in Blended Learning Settings
Issued Date: 30 Oct 2020
Abstract
This study aims to examine the efficacy of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) of English as a foreign or second language (L2) through two perspectives: learning gain and learner autonomy. Previous studies have shown that L2 learning combined with media could activate the learning processes, resulting in an easier recall of the target vocabulary required in L2. In addition, mobileassisted L2 learning could also enhance autonomous learning inasmuch as successful MALL would have to rely mainly on the autonomous learner even in learning contexts where the goal and task are already fixed. Based on this standpoint, the study hypothesizes that the engagement in L2 learning with mobile devices along with a classroom-based writing course could make L2 learners not only achieve the target L2 lexis effectively, leading to better L2 writing performance, but also help them to be more autonomous even in a setting when the task and goal are fixed. To test this hypothesis, both empirical and questionnaire studies were conducted for Japanese undergraduates (n=94). Based on the results of three weeks of L2 academic writing practice between groups learning with and without mobile devices, the findings of our t-test analyses of learners’ vocabulary recall and a questionnaire survey about learner autonomy suggested that MALL significantly contributed not only to L2 vocabulary recall in comprehensive and productive tests, but also to enhancing positive attitudes towards autonomous learning.
Download Media
PDF Subscribers OnlyDOI: 10.1558/cj.40436
References
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller(Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18–34). London, England:Longman.Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow,England: Pearson Education.Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis oflearning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159Çakmak, F., & Erçetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabularylearning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000155Chen, C. M., Liu, H., & Huang, H. B. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabularylearning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study ofTaiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL, 31(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000228Collentine, K. (2011). Learner autonomy in a task-based 3D world and production. LanguageLearning & Technology, 15(3), 50–67.Dang, T. T. (2012). Learner autonomy: A synthesis of theory and practice. The InternetJournal of Language, Culture & Society, 35, 52–67.Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.G-TELP (n.d.). Overview G-TELP. Retrieved May 19, 2020 from https://g-telp.jp/english/Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, England: PergamonPress for Council of Europe.Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal languagelearning through mobile devices. In L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.),Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281–294). Singapore: Springer.Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms for mobile learning: Framing research questions.In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–175). London,England: The Institute of Education.Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online languagecourses. Language Learning & Technology, 20 (2), 81–97.Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H.(2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065Lyddon, P. A. (2016). Mobile-assisted language learning and language learner autonomy.In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Short papers from EUROCALL2016 (pp. 302–306). Dublin, Ireland: Research-publishing.net.Murase, F. (2015). Measuring language learner autonomy: Problems and possibilities. InC. J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp.35–63). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman& R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 75–91). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices.New York, NY: Springer.Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.),Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 35–53). London, England:Longman.Reinders, H. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language Learning& Technology, 15(3), 1–3.Reinders, H., & Hubbard, P. (2013). CALL and learner autonomy: Affordances and constraints.In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computerassisted language learning (pp. 359–375). London, England: Continuum Books.Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). Special issue commentary: Learner autonomy and newlearning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 1–3.Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have wecome and where to next? Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 143–154.Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: Auser evaluation of the busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854–881.https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1456465Sato, T. (2016). Applicability of technology-enhanced visual glosses for explicit L2 vocabularylearning: The enhancement of metaphoric competence through the learning ofEnglish polysemous words. Ampersand, 3, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.03.003Sato, T., Matsunuma, M., & Suzuki, A. (2013). Enhancement of automatization throughvocabulary learning using CALL: Can prompt language processing lead to better comprehensionin L2 reading? ReCALL, 25(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000328Sato, T., & Suzuki, A. (2010). Do multimedia-oriented visual glosses really facilitate EFLvocabulary learning?: A comparison of planar images with three-dimensional images.Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 160–172.Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Learner autonomy and tandem learning: Putting principles intopractice in synchronous and asynchronous telecommunications environments. ComputerAssisted Language Learning, 16, 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.427.29484Steinberg, R. G. (2008). Perfect phrases for the TOEFL speaking and writing sections. NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill.Ushioda, E. (2013). Motivation matters in mobile language learning: A brief commentary.Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 1–5.Yeh, Y., & Wang, C.-W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learningstyles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131–144.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
