Communication & Medicine, Vol 10, No 3 (2013)

Beyond neutrality: Professionals’ responses to clients’ indirect complaints in a Therapeutic Community for people with a diagnosis of mental illness

Marco Pino, Luigina Mortari
Issued Date: 22 May 2014


Previous research has evidenced that in different institutional settings professionals are cautious when responding to clients’ indirect complaints and tend to avoid siding either with the clients/ complainants or the complained-of absent parties. In this article we use the method of Conversation Analysis to explore professional responses to clients’ indirect complaints in the context of a Therapeutic Community (TC) for people with diagnoses of mental illness in Italy. Although the TC staff members sometimes display a neutral orientation toward the clients’ complaints, as is the case in other institutional settings, in some instances they take a stance toward the clients’ complaints, either by distancing themselves or by overtly disaffiliating from them. We argue that these practices reflect the particular challenges of an institutional setting in which professionals engage with clients on a daily basis, have an institutional mandate of watching over them and are responsible for their safety. According to this interpretation, staff members’ nonneutrality toward clients’ complaints can be seen as a way of defending against the possibility, raised by the clients’ reports, that the staff members might be involved, albeit indirectly, in courses of action that have harmed or might harm the clients.

Download Media


DOI: 10.1558/cam.v10i3.213


Antaki, C., Young, N. and Finlay, M. (2002) Shaping clients’ answers: Departures from neutrality in care-staff interviews with people with a learning disability. Disability & Society 17 (4): 435–455.
Crescentini, A., De Felice, F. and Tonzar, C. (2004) L’educatore e la riabilitazione psichiatrica [The Educator and the Psychiatric Rehabilitation]. Roma: Carocci.
Drew, P. (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 295–325.
Drew, P. and Walker, T. (2009) Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2400–2414.
Heinemann, T. (2009) Participation and exclusion in third party complaints. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2435–2451.
Heinemann, T. and Traverso, V. (2009) Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2381–2384.
Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. W. (eds) (2006) Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ijäs-Kallio, T., Ruusuvuori, J. and Peräkylä, A. (2010) Patient involvement in problem presentation and diagnosis delivery in primary care. Communication and Medicine 7 (2): 131–141.
Jefferson, G. and Lee, J. R. E. (1992 [1981]) The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at work, 521–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jingree, T., Finlay, W. M. L. and Antaki, C. (2006) Empowering words, disempowering actions: An analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents’ meetings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50 (3): 212–226.
Koshik, I. (2003) Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5 (1) 51–77.
Maynard, D. W. (1998) Praising versus blaming the messenger: Moral issues in deliveries of good and bad news. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3&4): 359–395.
Robinson, J. D. and Heritage, J. (2005) The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: The completion relevance of current symptoms. Social Science Medicine 61 (2): 481–493.
Ruusuvuori, J. and Lindfors, P. (2009) Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2415–2434.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988) Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew and A. J. Wootton (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E. and Hepburn, A. (2005) ‘You can hear a lot through the walls’: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints. Discourse and Society 16 (5): 647–673.
Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A. and Ruusuvuori, J. (2010) Professional non-neutrality: Criticising the third party in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness 32 (5): 798–816.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]

Privacy Policy