The Environmental Relevance of the Idea of a Relational Self

doi:10.1558/jsrnc.v10i4.20243

Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, Vol 10, No 4 (2016)

The Environmental Relevance of the Idea of a Relational Self

Robert McKim

Issued Date: 30 Jan 2017

Abstract

Some scholars propose that the idea of the self as relational is environmentally relevant. I question the meaning, coherence, plausibility, and environmental relevance of the idea of a relational self. However, I also contend that the profoundly important purposes of those who consider this idea about the metaphysics of the self to be environmentally relevant may be achieved by a more commonsensical analysis of the self that has no particular metaphysical implications. Central to this alternative analysis is the idea that we should be in relationships that promote the achievement of an environmental goal that I briefly sketch.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 ) Restricted Access

DOI: 10.1558/jsrnc.v10i4.20243

References

Brown, Joseph Eppes. 1997. Animals of the Soul: Sacred Animals of the Oglala Sioux (Rockport, MA: Elements, rev. edn).

Callicott, J. Baird. 1986. ‘The Metaphysical Implications of Ecology’, Environmental Ethics 8.4: 308-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19868432.

Callicott, J. Baird. 1994. Earth’s Insights: A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback (Berkeley: University of California Press).

Callicott, J. Baird. 2013. ‘Ecology and Moral Ontology’, in Donato Bergandi (ed.), The Structural Links Between Ecology, Evolution, and Ethics: The Virtuous Epistemic Circle (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 296; Dordrecht, NL: Springer): 101-16.

Callicott, J. Baird. 2014. Thinking like a Planet: The Land Ethic and the Earth Ethic (New York: Oxford University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324880.001.0001.

Callicott, J. Baird, and Karen Mumford. 1997. ‘Ecological Sustainability as a Conservation Concept’, Conservation Biology 11.1: 32-40. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95468.x.

Callicott, J. Baird, Larry B. Crowder, and Karen Mumford. 1999. ‘Current Normative Concepts in Conservation’, Conservation Biology 13.1: 22-35.

Hershock, Peter D. 1999. Reinventing the Wheel: A Buddhist Response to the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press).

Macy, Joanna. 1991. Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems (Albany: State University of New York Press).

McKim, Robert. 2013. ‘On Comparing Religions in the Anthropocene’, American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34.3: 248-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjtheophil.34.3.0248.

Naess, Arne. 1989. Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle (trans. and ed. David Rothenberg; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Peterson, Anna. 2001. Being Human: Ethics, Environment, and Our Place in the World (Berkeley: University of California Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520226548.001.0001.

Plumwood, Val. 1991. ‘Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism’, Hypatia 6.1: 3-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00206.x.

Witherspoon, Gary. 1975. Language and Art in the Navajo Universe (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]