Image Ecologies, Spiritual Polytropy, and the Anthropocene
Abstract
Download Media
PDF (Price: £18.00 )DOI: 10.1558/jsrnc.39183
References
Albanese, Catherine. 1996. ‘Religion and American Popular Culture: An Introductory Essay’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 64.4: 733-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LXIV.4.733.
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Disciplines and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Baichwal, Jennifer. 2018. ‘Our Embedded Signal’, in Burtynsky, Baichwal, and De Pencier 2018: 197-203.
Bailey, Edward I. 1983. ‘The Implicit Religion of Contemporary Society: An Orientation and a Plea for Its Study’, Religion 13: 69-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(83)90006-4.
Bakewell, Liza. 1998. ‘Image Acts’, American Anthropologist 100.1: 22-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.1.22.
Bal, Mieke. 2001. Looking In: The Art of Viewing (Amsterdam: G+B Arts International).
Beller, Jonathan. 2006. The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England).
Belting, Hans. 1994. Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Belting, Hans. 2005. ‘Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology’, Critical Inquiry 31.2: 302-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/430962.
Belting, Hans. 2011. An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Bender, Coutrney, and Omar McRoberts. 2012. ‘Mapping a Field: Why and How to Study Spirituality’, SSRS Working Papers. Online: https://tif.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Why-and-How-to-Study-Spirtuality.pdf.
Boehm, Gottfried. 1994. Was ist ein Bild? (Munich: Fink).
Boehm, Gottfried, and W.J.T. Mitchell. 2009. ‘Pictorial Versus Iconic Turn: Two Letters’, Culture, Theory and Critique 50.2-3: 103-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/
14735780903240075.
Bredekamp, Horst. 2003. ‘A Neglected Tradition? Art History as Bildwissenschaft’, Critical Inquiry 29.3: 418-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/376303.
Bruce, Steve (ed.) 2002. Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Bryant, Jennings, and Mary Beth Oliver (eds.). 2009. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (New York: Routledge, 3rd edn).
Burke, Peter. 2001. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Burtynsky, Edward, Jennifer Baichwal, and Nicholas De Pencier (eds.). 2018. Anthropocene (Gottingen: Steidl).
Cammaer, Gerda. 2009. ‘Edward Burtynsky’s Manufactured Landscapes: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Creating Moving Still Images and Stilling Moving Images of Ecological Disasters’, Environmental Communication 3.1: 121-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802700599.
Carrithers, Michael. 2000. ‘On Polytropy: Or the Natural Condition of Spiritual Cosmopolitanism in India: The Digambar Jain Case’, Modern Asian Studies 34.4: 831-61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00003991.
Casetti, Francesco. 2008. Eye of the Century: Film, Experience, Modernity (trans. Erin Larkin and Jennifer Pranolo; New York: Columbia University Press).
Chidester, David. 1996. ‘The Church of Baseball, the Fetish of Coca-Cola, and the Potlatch of Rock ‘n’ Roll: Theoretical Models for the Study of Religion in American Popular Culture’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 64.4: 743-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LXIV.4.743.
Chidester, David. 2005. Authentic Fakes: Religion and American Popular Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Christiansen, Steen. n.d. ‘The Morph-Image: Five Theses on Post-Cinema’, Steen Christiansen. Online: http://www.dissemination.dk/papers/the-morph-image/.
Crary, Jonathan. 1990. On Vision and Modernity: Techniques of the Observer in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Crist, Eileen. 2013. ‘On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature’, Environmental Humanities 3: 129-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611266.
Davis, Heather, and Etienne Turpin. 2015. Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies (Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_560010.
Davis, Richard H. 1997. Lives of Indian Images (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
de Vries, Hent (ed.). 2009. Religion: Beyond a Concept (New York: Fordham University Press).
de Vries, Hent, and Lawrence E. Sullivan (eds.). 2006. Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World (New York: Fordham University Press).
Debray, Regis. 1995. ‘The Three Ages of Looking’ (trans. E. Rauth), Critical Inquiry 21.3: 529-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/448763.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement Image (trans. H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time Image (trans. H. Tomlinson and R. Galeta; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Demos, T.J. 2017. Against the Anthropocene: Visual Culture and Environment Today (Berlin: Sternberg).
Denson, Shane, and Julia Leyda (eds.). 2016. Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film (Falmer, UK: REFRAME).
Diehl, Carol. 2006. ‘The Toxic Sublime (Edward Burtynsky)’, Art in America, 26 February: 118-23.
Elkins, James. 1997. The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing (New York: Simon & Schuster).
Elkins, James. 1998. On Pictures and the Words that Fail Them (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Elkins, James. 1999. The Domain of Images (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Elkins, James. 2001. Pictures and Tears: A History of People Who Have Cried in Front of Paintings (New York: Routledge).
Elkins, James. 2003. Visual Studies: A Sceptical Introduction (New York: Routledge).
Elkins, James, and Maja Naef (eds.). 2011. What is an Image? (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).
Emmeche, Claus, and Kalevi Kull (eds.). 2011. Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs (London: Imperial College Press). Doi: https://doi.org/
10.1142/p771.
Evans, Jessica, and Stuart Hall (eds.). 1999. Visual Culture: The Reader (London: Sage).
Favareau, Donald (ed.). 2010. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary (Berlin: Springer). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1.
Fitzgerald, Timothy (ed.). 2007. Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations (London: Equinox).
Foltz, Richard. 2007. ‘The Religion of the Market: Reflections on a Decade of Discussion’, Worldviews 11.2: 135-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853507X204914.
Foster, Hal (ed.). 1988. Vision and Visuality (New York: Dia Art Foundation).
Fox, Roy F. 1994. Images in Language, Media, and Mind (Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English).
Freedberg, David. 1989. The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/
chicago/9780226259031.001.0001.
Fuller, Matthew. 2005. Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Gibson, James J. 1978. ‘The Ecological Approach to the Visual Perception of Pictures’, Leonardo 11: 227-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1574154.
Gill, Carolyn Bailey (ed.). 2000. Time and the Image (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1960. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd edn).
Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1982. The Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (New York: Phaidon Press).
Gorski, Philip, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen (eds.). 2012. The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society (New York: New York University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/
9780814738726.001.0001.
Gottlieb, Roger S. 2006. A Greener Faith: Religious Environmentalism and Our Planet’s Future (New York: Oxford University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/
acprof:oso/9780195176483.003.0003.
Grau, Oliver, with Thomas Veigl. 2011. Imagery in the 21st Century (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015721.001.0001.
Gruzinski, Serge. 2001. Images at War: Mexico from Columbus to Blade Runner (1492–2019) (Durham, NC: Duke University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/
9780822383116.
Guattari, Felix. 2000. The Three Ecologies (trans. I. Pindar and P. Sutton; London: Athlone).
Gullion, Jessica Smartt. 2018. Diffractive Ethnography: Social Sciences and the Ontological Turn (New York: Routledge). Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044998.
Harman, Graham. 2018. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (London: Routledge). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.997.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. ‘The Age of the World Picture’, in The Question Concerning Technology (trans. and ed. W. Lovitt; New York: Harper & Row): 115-54.
Hillman, James. 1989. ‘Back to Beyond: On Cosmology’, in D.R. Griffin (ed.), Archetypal Process: Self and Divine in Whitehead, Jung, and Hillman (Evanston: Northwestern University Press): 213-32.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe (trans. B. Haveland; Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition (New York: Cambridge University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316218907.
Holzl, Ingrid, and Remi Marie. 2015. Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image (Bristol, UK: Intellect).
Hopkins, Robert. 1998. Picture, Image, and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Howes, Graham. 2007. The Art of the Sacred: An Introduction to the Aesthetics of Art and Belief (London: I.B. Tauris). Doi: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755604388.
Huss, Boaz. 2014. ‘Spirituality: The Emergence of a New Cultural Category and Its Challenge to the Religious and the Secular’, Journal of Contemporary Religion 29.1: 47-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2014.864803.
Ingold, Tim. 1992. ‘Culture and the Perception of the Environment’, in E. Croll and D. Parkin (eds.), Bush Base: Forest Farm: Culture, Environment and Development (London: Routledge): 39-56.
Ivakhiv, Adrian J. 2001. Claiming Sacred Ground: Pilgrims and Politics at Glastonbury and Sedona (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Ivakhiv, Adrian J. 2006. ‘Toward a Geography of “Religion”: On the Spatial Dimension of Significance’,
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.