Language and Sociocultural Theory, Vol 1, No 1 (2014)

Classroom Dynamic Assessment of Reading Comprehension with Second Language Learners

Kristin J. Davin, Francis J. Troyan, Ashley L. Hellmann
Issued Date: 25 Feb 2014


This study examines the design and implementation of a dynamic reading comprehension task (D-RCT) for classroom use with second language learners. A paper and pencil D-RCT was designed that could be (1) utilized on a regular basis, (2) adapted to any content, and (3) easily implemented in classrooms where access to technology is limited. The teacher in the present work utilized pre-scripted mediation prompts during the D-RCT that were assigned a numerical value to calculate four scores for each individual student: an actual score, a mediated score, a learning potential score, and a mediation value score. The present study describes the assessment design and analyzes scoring procedures to determine their potential for classroom application. The authors conclude that D-RCTs should be used as a learning tool in second language classrooms and suggest recommendations for scoring procedures.

Download Media

PDF (Price: £17.50 )

DOI: 10.1558/lst.v1i1.1


American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines: Speaking, Writing, Listening, and Reading. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL, Inc.
Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 465–483.
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (ed.), Dynamic Assessment: An Interactive Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential, 52–81. New York: Guilford.
Budoff, M. and Friedman, M. (1964). ‘Learning Potential’ as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology 28 (5): 434–439. Retrieved from
Campione, J. C. and Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic testing with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (ed.), Dynamic Testing, 82–115. New York: Guilford Press.
Cole, M. and Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, 1–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17 (3): 303–322.
Davin, K. J. and Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals 46 (1): 5–22.
Davin, K. J., Troyan, F. J., Donato, R. and Hellman, A. (2011). Research on the integrated performance assessment in an early foreign language learning program. Foreign Language Annals 44 (4), 605–625.
Dominguez, R. and Pessoa, S. (1999). Early versus late start in foreign language education: Documenting achievements. Foreign Language Annals 38 (4): 473–480.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. and Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B. and Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Glisan, E., Adair-Hauck, B., Koda, K., Sandrock, S. P. and Swender, E. (2003). ACTFL integrated performance assessment. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.
Glisan, E., Uribe, D. and Adair-Hauck, B. (2007). Research on integrated performance assessment at the post-secondary level: Student performance across the modes of communication. Canadian Modern Language Review 64 (1): 39–67.
Guthke, J. (1982). The learning test concept – an alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. The German Journal of Psychology 6 (4): 306–324.
Guthke, J. and Beckmann, J. F. (2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice. In C. S. Lidz and J. G. Elliott (eds), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications, 17–69. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haywood, H. C. and Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1961). Learning abilities in Mexican-American and Anglo-American children. California Journal of Educational Research 12 (4): 147–159.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). Intelligence, learning ability and socioeconomic status. Journal of Special Education 3 (1): 23–33.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological Tools: A Sociocultural Approach to Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozulin, A. and Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International 23 (1): 112–127.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 49–72.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2011a). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 15 (1): 323–340.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2011b). Dynamic Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Teacher’s Guide (2nd edn). University Park, PA: CALPER.
Lidz, C. S. and Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children with typical and atypical development. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageyev, S. Miller and B. Gindis (eds), Vygotsky’s Theory of Education in Cultural Context, 99–116. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Negueruela, E. (2008). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads (to) second language development. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 189–227. London: Equinox.
Peirce, B. N., Swain, M. and Hart, D. (1993). Self-assessment, French immersion, and locus of control. Applied Linguistics 14 (1): 25–42.
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 9 (3), 233–265.
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research 17 (3): 323–342.
Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tzuriel, D. and Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (1): 143–165.
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development 44 (2–3): 84–97.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole and J. V. Wertsch (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, 178–192. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, J. P and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Equinox Publishing Ltd - 415 The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row, Sheffield, S1 2BX United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)114 221-0285 - Email: [email protected]

Privacy Policy