Riffing on course redesign

Leveraging pedagogy for teaching music online

Authors

  • Benjamin Phipps University of South Wales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/prbt.19236%20

Keywords:

online music teaching, music course design, music education

Abstract

In this article, I riff on redesigning music education for online delivery from the perspective of an ethnomusicologist and teacher working as an educational developer during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. I explore how the affordances and limitations of remote learning and online technologies impacted the pedagogical approaches I use to design music courses in tertiary education. Issues such as the applicability of curriculum to students’ working life and active learning have become pertinent to teaching and learning scholarship over the last two decades. Over the last year, these issues were placed under further scrutiny, and calls have accelerated for re-examining strategies that build foundational skills and embrace more active learning design. For music teaching, this poses a unique opportunity to make courses more relevant to our students and create improved social outcomes for music education. However, adapting courses also presents a significant challenge in converting pedagogy to be sustainable in the current tertiary education sector. I reflect on educational developments that can enhance university music teaching through the benefits of technology and pedagogy that improve student learning.

Author Biography

  • Benjamin Phipps, University of South Wales

    Dr Benjamin Phipps currently works as an Educational Developer at the University of New South Wales. His research examines how musicians learn and develop their improvisational practices, particularly in jazz and world music. Previous research has examined the development of improvisational practice amongst double bass players using ethnomusicological methods.

References

Carless, David, and David Boud. 2018. ‘The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43/8: 1315–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Hattie, John. 2009. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. London and New York: Routledge.

Jang, Hyungshim, JohnMarshall Reeve and Edward Deci. 2010. ‘Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure’. Journal of Educational Psychology 102/3: 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682

Johnson, C. 2020. ‘A Conceptual Model for Teaching Music Online’. International Journal on Innovations in Online Education 4/2. Online at https://onlineinnovationsjournal.com/streams/visual-and-performing-arts/4cc75e683a8f5c22.html (accessed 18 May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJInnovOnlineEdu.2020035128

Lebler, Donald. 2008. ‘Popular Music Pedagogy: Peer-learning in Practice’. Music Education Research 10/2: 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800802079056

Martin, Andrew, and Paul Evans. 2018. ‘Load Reduction Instruction: Exploring a Framework that Assesses Explicit Instruction through to Independent Learning’. Teaching and Teacher Education 73: 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.018

Tai, Joanna, Rola Ajjawi, David Boud, Phillip Dawson and Ernesto Panadero. 2018. ‘Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work’. Higher Education 76/3: 467–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Published

2021-08-28

How to Cite

Phipps, B. . (2021). Riffing on course redesign: Leveraging pedagogy for teaching music online. Perfect Beat, 21(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1558/prbt.19236