After the Body

Debating Organ Transplantation in Egypt

Authors

  • Mohammed Tabishat Department of Sociology, United Arab Emirate University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/post.v3i1.77

Keywords:

law, religion, politics, transplantation, body parts

Abstract

Transplantation of body parts has long provoked debates in Egypt among various community leaders who most notably represent the institutions of medical care, the law, religion and politics. The debates include diverse issues stretching most significantly from the practical benefits of these advanced surgeries, to their contribution of preserving the overall integrity of society as a whole as they provide solutions to purely medical problems while simultaneously solving larger moral, social and ethical challenges. I consider these debates to be representations constituted by a discourse of power over the body, which I suggest to should be viewed not only as a skin-bound physical entity but more significantly as a space incarnating the moral, ethical and spiritual aspects of society at large. Furthermore, I suggest that this conceptualization, in which religion, the law and ethics play the most significant roles, throws doubt over materialist perspectives of embodiment and calls for further attention to the notion of ensoulment.

Author Biography

  • Mohammed Tabishat, Department of Sociology, United Arab Emirate University

    Mohammed Tabishat is currently a fellow of the Wissenschaftskolleg, Berlin, Program of Europe in the Middle East, the Middle East in Europe (EUME) and an Assistant professor of anthropology and sociology, Department of Sociology of the University of the United Arab Emirates.

References

Asad, Mohammed. 1980. The Message of the Quran. Gibraltar: Dar Al- Andalus.

Asad, Talal. 1986. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam.” In Occasional Papers: The Centre for Contemporary Arab Studies, 1–23. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

———. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

———. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Douglas, Mary. 1970. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Routledge.

Good, Byron. 1995. Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lock, Margaret. 1996. “Displacing Suffering: The Reconstruction of Death in North America and Japan.” In Social Suffering, ed. Arthur Kleinman, Vena Das and Margaret Lock, 207–44. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Morsy, Soheir. 1988. “Islamic Clinics in Egypt: The Cultural Elaboration of Biomedical Hegemony.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly n.s. 2, no. 4: 355–69.

Papagaroufali, Eleni. 1999. “Donation of Human Organs or Bodies after Death: A Cultural Phenomenology of ‘flesh’ in the Greek Context.” Ethos 27: 283–314. doi:10.1525/eth.1999.27.3.283.

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2000. The Global Traffic in Human Organs. Current Anthropology 41(2): 191–210. doi:10.1086/300123.

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, and Margaret Lock. 1987. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to an Anthropology of the Body.” Medial Anthropology Quarterly ns 1, no. 1: 6–41.

Sharp, Lesley. 2000. “The Commodification of the Body and its Parts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 287–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.

Tamir, Moustafa. 2000. “Conflict and Co-operation between the State and Religious Institutions in Contemporary Egypt.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 32: 3–22. doi:10.1017/S0020743800021024.

Titmuss, Richard. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.

Published

2008-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tabishat, M. (2008). After the Body: Debating Organ Transplantation in Egypt. Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts, 3(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.v3i1.77

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>