What discourse analytic approaches contribute to the study of language and autism

A focus on conversation analysis

Authors

  • Laura Sterponi University of California Berkeley
  • Jenton de Kirby University of California Berkeley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.28458

Keywords:

Autism, language, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, echolalia, pronoun reversal and avoidance, pragmatic deficit

Abstract

In this article, we offer a framework for conceptualizing the contribution of discourse analytic approaches to the study of the verbal communication of children with autism, with an emphasis on conversation analysis. We argue that insights from these approaches serve to complexify traditional deficit interpretations of prototypical features of autistic language, such as pronoun atypicality, pragmatic difficulties, and echolalia. Our framework is presented in three parts, each comprising a theoretical premise about language made by discourse analytic approaches and the premise’s methodological corollary. To illustrate, we analyze extracts from three children with autism, pointing to competencies and interactional processes and that are largely invisible in mainstream research. Finally, we describe how these insights offer fruitful suggestions for clinical intervention.

Author Biographies

  • Laura Sterponi, University of California Berkeley

    Laura Sterponi is an associate professor at the University of California, Berkeley Institute of Human Development and Graduate School of Education. Laura has developed a research programme that is centrally concerned with the role of language and literacy practices in children’s development and education. Her studies have examined communicative practices in both typical and atypical children. Her work on autism aims to illuminate the interactional matrix of key features of autistic communication, such as echolalia and pronominal reversal/ avoidance. Her work has been published in Autism, Human Development, Discourse Studies, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Linguistics & Education and Journal of Child Language.

  • Jenton de Kirby, University of California Berkeley

    Kenton de Kirby is a PhD candidate at the University of California, Berkeley Graduate School of Education. His research interests center on human development, both typical and atypical. His publications cover development in diverse contexts, including mathematics education, culture-cognition relations, autism, and language-in-social interaction. His articles have appeared in Human Development, Journal of Cognition and Culture, Autism and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, among other journals. His dissertation, for which he received a Spencer/ National Academy of Education Fellowship, investigates students’ developing participation in a core semiotic practice in academic mathematics.

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beach, W. A. (1993). The delicacy of preoccupation. Text and Performance Quarterly, 13, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939309366059

Briggs, C. (1993). Personal sentiments and polyphonic voices in Warao women’s ritual wailing: Music and poetics in a critical and collective discourse. American Anthropologist, 95(4), 929–957. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00080

Carnap, R. (1952). Meaning postulates. Philosophical Studies, 3, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350366

Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024

Du Bois, J. W., Hobson, R. P. & Hobson, J. A. (2014). Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0025

Fasulo, A. & Fiore, F. (2007). A valid person: Non-competence as a conversational outcome. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (eds), Discursive research in practice (pp. 224–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611216.012

Fasulo, A., Liberati, V. & Pontecorvo, C. (2002). Language games in the strict sense of the term: Children’s poetics and conversation. In S. Blum-Kulka & C. Snow (eds), Talking to adults: The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition (pp. 209–237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferguson, C. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (eds), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 209–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gardner, H. & Forrester, M. (eds) (2010). Analysing interactions in childhood. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 272–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x

Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435

Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069459

Hobson, P. R., Lee, A. & Hobson, J. A. (2010). Personal pronouns and communicative engagement in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0910-5

Jefferson, G. (1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939609366132

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Jefferson, G. & Schenkein, J. (1978). Some sequential negotiations in conversation: Unexpanded and expanded versions of projected action sequences. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 155–172). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50013-6

Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.

Keenan, E. O. (1974). Conversational competence in children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900000623

Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2004). How children with autism and Asperger syndrome respond to questions: A ‘naturalistic’ theory of mind task. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041767

Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (eds), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005

Local, J. & Wootton, A. (1995). Interactional and phonetics aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: A case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 155–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209508985330

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (eds) The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Maynard, D. W. (2005). Social actions, gestal coherence, and designations of disability: Lessons from and about autism. Social Problems, 52(4), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.499

Maynard, D. W. & Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational testing. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989493

Muskett, T., Perkins, M. Clegg, J. & Body, R. (2010). Inflexibility as an interactional phenomenon: Using conversation analysis to re-examine a symptom of autism. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903281739

Ochs, E. (2012). Experiencing language. Anthropological Theory, 12(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499612454088

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (2005). Practical logic and autism. In C. Casey & R. Edgerton (eds), A companion to psychological anthropology: Modernity and psychocultural change (pp. 140–167). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996409.ch9

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (2010). Autistic sociality. Ethos, 38(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01082.x

Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Sirota, K. G. & Solomon, O. (2004). Autism and the social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies, 6, 147–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041766

Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030

Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on languages and linguistics (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7

Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (eds), Interaction in human development (pp.139–153). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The onmirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2

Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Sidnell, J. (2010). Questioning repeats in the talk of four-year-old children. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (eds), Analysing interactions in childhood (pp. 103–127). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Sterponi, L. & Fasulo, A. (2010). ‘How to go on’: Intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos, 38(1), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01084.x

Sterponi, L. & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as interactional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000682

Sterponi, L., de Kirby, K. & Shankey, J. (2015). Rethinking language in autism. Autism, 19(5), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314537125

Stribling, P., Rae, J. & Dickerson, P. (2009). Using conversation analysis to explore the recurrence of a topic in the talk of a boy with an autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 555–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802491165

Tarplee, C. & Barrow, E. (1999). Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: A case study of a 3-year-old child on the autistic spectrum. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 449–82.

Urban, G. (1989). The ‘I’ of discourse. In B. Lee & G. Urban (eds), Semiotics, self and society (pp. 27–51). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859225-004

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

Woffitt, R. & Holt, N. (2011). Introspective discourse and the poetics of subjective experience. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.567097

Wootton, A. (1999). An investigation of delayed echoing in a child with autism. Language, 19, 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379901905704

Published

2017-06-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sterponi, L., & de Kirby, J. (2017). What discourse analytic approaches contribute to the study of language and autism: A focus on conversation analysis. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 1(1), 30-54. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.28458

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>